INAAP aniline pond site 5 phase II RCRA facility investigation report Oct 2002

Description:	The revised final report for aniline pond site 5 at Indiana Army Ammunition Plant of Phase II RCRA facility investigation prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in October 2002.The United States federal government began acquiring land in Charlestown, Indiana in 1940 to build a smokeless powder ordnance plant to supply the US military during World War II. Indiana Ordnance Works (IOW) Plant 1 and Hoosier Ordnance Plant (HOP) began production in 1941. In 1944, IOW Plant 2 construction began. On 30 Nov 1945 at the end of WWII, the three plants were combined and renamed Indiana Arsenal. Between 1 Nov 1961 and 1 Aug 1963, the plant was designated Indiana Ordnance Plant. After this time, it became Indiana Army Ammunition Plant (INAAP). Production of ordnance continued at the plant until 1992. After that time, the land and facilities were leased to private industry. A large portion of the land became Charlestown State Park. In October 2016, all the land and facilities were officially sold by the government. This item is part of a larger collection of items from INAAP that are kept at Charlestown Library. REVISED FINAL REPOR TANILINE POND – SITE 5INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTPHASE II RCRA FACILITY INVESTIGATIONPrepared forU.S. Army Corps of EngineersLouisville DistrictOctober 2002Prepared byURS 12120 Shamrock Plaza, Suite 300Omaha, Nebraska 68154TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA iExecutive Summary ..........................................................................................................................ES-1Section 1 Site Location and Description....................................................................................... 1-11.1 Operational History and Waste Characteristics ....................................... 1-11.2 Previous Investigations ............................................................................ 1-21.3 Report Organization................................................................................. 1-2Section 2 Field Activities Summary .............................................................................................. 2-12.1 Direct Push Soil, Soil Gas and Groundwater Survey............................... 2-12.2 Geophysical Survey ................................................................................. 2-12.3 Soil and Sediment Sampling.................................................................... 2-12.3.1 Soil ............................................................................................... 2-12.3.2 Sediment ...................................................................................... 2-22.4 Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................ 2-22.5 Surface Water Sampling .......................................................................... 2-32.6 Field Screening Results............................................................................ 2-32.7 IDW Disposition ...................................................................................... 2-3Section 3 Physical Investigation Results ..................................................................................... 3-13.1 Topography and Surface Features ........................................................... 3-13.2 Local Surficial Geology........................................................................... 3-13.3 Shallow Hydrogeology ............................................................................ 3-3Section 4 Data Quality Review and Validation ............................................................................. 4-14.1 Phase I RI................................................................................................. 4-14.2 Phase II RFI ............................................................................................. 4-1Section 5 Chemical Investigation Results .................................................................................... 5-1Section 6 Contamination Assessment.......................................................................................... 6-16.1 Potential Sources of Contamination from Historical ManufacturingProcesses .................................................................................................. 6-16.1.1 Production of Diphenylamine and Dimethylamine ..................... 6-16.1.2 Production of Nitrocellulose and Smokeless Powder.................. 6-26.2 Near Surface Soils and Sediments ........................................................... 6-36.2.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-3TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA ii6.2.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-36.2.3 Pesticides/PCBs ........................................................................... 6-46.2.4 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines........................................................... 6-46.2.5 Metals and Cyanide...................................................................... 6-46.3 Subsurface Soils....................................................................................... 6-56.3.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-56.3.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-56.3.3 Pesticides/PCBs ........................................................................... 6-56.3.4 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines........................................................... 6-66.3.5 Metals and Cyanide...................................................................... 6-66.4 Surface Water........................................................................................... 6-66.4.1 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-76.4.2 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines........................................................... 6-76.4.3 Metals........................................................................................... 6-76.5 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 6-76.5.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-76.5.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-86.5.3 Pesticides/PCBs ........................................................................... 6-86.5.4 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines........................................................... 6-86.5.5 Metals........................................................................................... 6-8Section 7 Human Health Risk Evaluation ..................................................................................... 7-17.1 Introduction.............................................................................................. 7-17.1.1 Purpose......................................................................................... 7-17.2 Risk Screening Process ............................................................................ 7-27.2.1 Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs) ........ 7-27.3 Exposure Assessment............................................................................... 7-47.3.1 Exposure Point Concentrations.................................................... 7-47.3.1.1 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) ........................... 7-47.3.1.2 Deer Tissue Concentration............................................ 7-57.3.2 Receptors...................................................................................... 7-77.3.3 Exposure Pathways ...................................................................... 7-8TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA iii7.3.4 Exposure Assumptions ................................................................ 7-97.4 Toxicity Assessment .............................................................................. 7-127.4.1 Toxicity Assessment of Noncarcinogenic Effects ..................... 7-127.4.2 Toxicity Assessment of Carcinogenic Effects ........................... 7-137.4.3 Source of the Critical Toxicity Values....................................... 7-157.5 Risk Characterization............................................................................. 7-157.5.1 Qualitative Assessment of Exposure to Iron.............................. 7-187.5.2 Qualitative Assessment of Exposure to Amino-Dinitrotoluenes........................................................................... 7-187.5.3 Qualitative Assessment of Exposure to Diphenylamines .......... 7-197.6 Uncertainty Analysis.............................................................................. 7-197.6.1 Data Collection and Evaluation ................................................. 7-207.6.1.1 Data Collection ........................................................... 7-207.6.1.2 Data Evaluation........................................................... 7-207.6.1.3 Exposure Point Concentrations................................... 7-217.6.2 Exposure Assessment................................................................. 7-217.6.3 Toxicity Assessment .................................................................. 7-227.6.4 Risk Characterization................................................................. 7-23Section 8 Ecological Risk Evaluation ........................................................................................... 8-18.1 Introduction.............................................................................................. 8-18.1.1 Purpose......................................................................................... 8-28.1.2 Background.................................................................................. 8-28.1.3 Technical Approach ..................................................................... 8-48.2 Screening Level Ecological Risk Screen ................................................. 8-48.2.1 Habitat Assessment and Applicable Media ................................. 8-48.2.2 Identification of Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern(COPECs) .................................................................................... 8-58.2.2.1 Environmental Screening Values for Surface Water andChemicals of Potential Ecological Concern ................................ 8-88.2.2.2 Environmental Screening Values for Sediment-AssociatedOrganisms of Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern........ 8-10TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA iv8.2.2.3 Environmental Screening Values for Soil-AssociatedOrganisms and Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern ..... 8-118.2.2.4 Environmental Screening Values for Higher Vertebratesand Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern........................ 8-138.3 Tier II Ecological Risk Assessment....................................................... 8-198.3.1 Problem Formulation ................................................................. 8-198.3.1.1 Relevant Ecological Issues and Environmental Setting8-198.3.1.2 Summary and Assessment Endpoints ......................... 8-268.3.1.3 Exposure Assessment.................................................. 8-288.3.1.4 Toxicity (Effects) Assessment .................................... 8-328.3.2 Analysis Plan ............................................................................. 8-368.3.2.1 Measurement Endpoints and Receptors of Concern... 8-368.3.2.2 Toxicity Reference Values for Risk Characterization 8-478.4 Risk Characterization............................................................................. 8-498.4.1 Primary Producers and Assessment Endpoint #1 ...................... 8-508.4.2 Decomposers and Detritivores - Assessment Endpoint #2 ........ 8-518.4.3 Water Column Invertebrates and Amphibians - AssessmentEndpoint #3 and Measurement Endpoints #1, 2, and 3. ............ 8-528.4.4 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic Herbivores – AssessmentEndpoint #3 and Measurement Endpoints #4 and 5 .................. 8-538.4.5 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic Omnivores and AssessmentEndpoint #4................................................................................ 8-538.4.6 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic 1st Order Carnivores andAssessment Endpoint #5............................................................ 8-538.4.7 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic 2nd Order Carnivores andAssessment Endpoint #6............................................................ 8-548.4.8 Cave Resources - Assessment Endpoint #7 ............................... 8-548.4.9 Risk Characterization Summary and Ecological Significance .. 8-548.5 Uncertainty Analysis.............................................................................. 8-57Section 9 Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................ 9-19.1 Summary.................................................................................................. 9-19.1.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................... 9-19.1.2 Contamination Assessment.......................................................... 9-19.1.2.1 Near Surface Soil and Sediment ................................... 9-1TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA v9.1.2.2 Subsurface Soil Samples............................................... 9-29.1.2.3 Surface Water Samples ................................................. 9-29.1.2.4 Groundwater Samples................................................... 9-29.1.3 Human Health Risk Screen/Assessment...................................... 9-29.1.3.1 Soil/Sediment................................................................ 9-29.1.3.2 Groundwater/Surface Water ......................................... 9-29.1.4 Ecological Risk Screen / Assessment .......................................... 9-39.2 Recommendations.................................................................................... 9-4Section 10 References.................................................................................................................... 10-1TABLE OF CONTENTSList of TablesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA viTable 2-1 Summary of Phase I RI Samples for Chemical AnalysisTable 2-2 Summary of Phase II RFI Samples for Chemical AnalysisTable 2-3 Summary of Field Screening For Organic Vapors in Soil SamplesTable 5-1 Comparison of Chemicals Detected in TCLP Sample to RegulatoryLimitsTable 5-2 Summary of Chemicals Detected in Soil and Sediment SamplesCollectedTable 5-3 Summary of Chemicals Detected in Surface Water and GroundwaterSamples CollectedTable 7-1 Comparison of Maximum Total Soil and Sediment Concentrations toScreening LevelsTable 7-2 Comparison of Maximum Surface Soil Concentrations to Screening LevelsTable 7-3 Comparison of Maximum Surface Water and Groundwater Concentrationsto Screening LevelsTable 7-4 Total Soil/Sediment Exposure Point ConcentrationTable 7-5 Surface Soil/Sediment Exposure Point ConcentrationsTable 7-6 Deer Tissue ConcentrationsTable 7-7 Parameters Used To Evaluate Potential Exposure Human Health RiskAssessmentTable 7-8 Critical Toxicity Values for Chemicals of Potential ConcernTable 7-9 USEPA Weight-Of-Evidence Carcinogenic Classification of ChemicalsTable 7-10 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and Carcinogenic RisksAssociated with Total Soil/SedimentTable 7-11 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and Carcinogenic RisksAssociated with Surface Soil/SedimentTable 7-12 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and Carcinogenic RisksAssociated with Surface Soil/Sediment and Game IngestionTable 8-1 Maximum Values Compared to Ecological Screening Values (ESVs) forSelection of Surface Water Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern(COPECs)Table 8-2 Maximum Concentrations Compared to ESVs for Selection of Chemicals ofSediment COPECsTable 8-3 Maximum Values Compared to ESVs for Selection of Soil COPECsTable 8-4 Comparison of Maximum Water / Soil / Sediment Concentrations to ESVsfor Selection of Indirect (Foodweb) COPECsTABLE OF CONTENTSList of TablesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA viiTable 8-5 Comparison of Predicted Air Concentrations Based on Maximum SurfaceWater Levels, Within Caves to ESVsTable 8-6 Chemicals Selected As COPECs for Direct Ecological ExposuresTable 8-7 Chemicals Selected As COPECs for Indirect (Food Web) ExposuresTable 8-8 Summary of COPECs and Measurement Endpoints for the Ecological RiskAssessmentTable 8-9 Physical and Behavioral Characteristics of Representative Receptors ofConcern (ROCs)Table 8-10 Assumed Dietary Compositions for the Representative ROCsTable 8-11 Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) for Direct Exposure to COPECs inWaterTable 8-12 TRVs for Direct Exposure to COPECs in SedimentTable 8-13 TRVs for Direct Exposure to COPECs in SoilTable 8-14 Oral TRVs Selected for Indirect Exposure to COPECsTable 8-15 Ecological Hazard Quotient (HQ) Results for Terrestrial Plants, AssessmentEndpoint #1, Measurement Endpoints #1 & 3Table 8-16 Ecological HQ Results for Aquatic Plants, Assessment Endpoint #1,Measurement Endpoints # 2 & 4Table 8-17 Ecological HQ Results for Sediment-Associated Invertebrate Detritivores,Assessment Endpoint #2, Measurement Endpoints # 1, 4, 5, 7, & 8Table 8-18 Ecological HQ Results for Soil Microbial Activity and InvertebrateDetritivores, Assessment Endpoint #2, Measurement Endpoints #2, 6 & 9Table 8-19 Ecological HQ Results for Aquatic (Water Column) Microbial Activity,Assessment Endpoint #2, Measurement Endpoints #3 & 10Table 8-20 Ecological HQ Results for Aquatic (Water Column) Invertebrates andLarval Amphibians - Assessment Endpoint #3, Measurement Endpoints #1,2, & 3Table 8-21 Ecological HQ Results for Representative Herbivores, AssessmentEndpoint #3, Measurement Endpoints #4 & 5Table 8-22 Ecological HQ Results for Representative Omnivores, AssessmentEndpoint #4, Measurement Endpoints #1 & 2Table 8-23 Ecological HQ Results for Representative 1st-Order Carnivores, AssessmentEndpoint #5, Measurement Endpoints #1, 2 & 3Table 8-24 Ecological HQ Results for Representative 2nd-Order Carnivores,Assessment Endpoint #6, Measurement Endpoint #1TABLE OF CONTENTSList of FiguresQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA viiiFigure 1-1 Site Location MapFigure 1-2 Surface Features MapFigure 2-1 Sample Location MapFigure 3-1 Electrical Resistivity Transect #1, Array 1Figure 3-2 Electrical Resistivity Transect #1, Array 2Figure 3-3 Electrical Resistivity Transect #2Figure 3-4 Electrical Resistivity Transect #3Figure 3-5 Simplified Boring LogsFigure 3-6 Geologic Cross SectionsFigure 6-1 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in SoilFigure 6-2 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in SedimentFigure 6-3 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in Surface Water andGroundwaterFigure 8-1 Ecological Evaluation ProcessFigure 8-2 Conceptual Ecological Exposure (Direct & Foodweb) ModelFigure 9-1 Human Health COPCs and Ecological COPECs Detected in Soil,Sediment, Surface Water and GroundwaterTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AppendicesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA ixAppendix A Data Quality Review and ValidationAppendix B Human Health Risk Statistics and CalculationsAppendix C Ecological Risk Statistics and CalculationsAppendix D Daily Quality Control ReportsAppendix E Boring and Trench LogsAppendix F Geotechnical DataAppendix G Sample Collection Field SheetsAppendix H Summary of Analytical DataNote: Information contained in the Appendices is included in CD-ROM format. The CD-ROMmay be found at the back of this binder.TABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA xACHe AcetylcholinesteraseADI Acceptable Daily IntakeADNTs Amino-dinitrotoluenesATP Adenosine TriphosphateAE Assessment EndpointAEC U.S. Army Environmental CenterAET Apparent Effect LevelsALAD Alpha-aminolevulinic Acid DehydrogeuaseAPCB Jefferson County Air Pollution Control BoardAQUIRE Aquatic Information Retrieval System.AST Aboveground Storage TankASTER Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of RiskATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registrybgs Below Ground SurfaceBA BioavailabilityBCFs Bioconcentration FactorsBRAC Base Re-Alignment and ClosureBSAFs Biota-Sediment Accumulation FactorsBTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, XylenesBTFs Biota Transfer FactorsBtu British Thermal UnitBW Body WeightCERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and LiabilityActCDI Chronic Daily IntakeCLP Contract Laboratory ProgramCMS Corrective Measures StudyCOC Chemicals of ConcernCOI Chemical of InterestCOPC Chemicals of Potential ConcernCOPEC Chemicals of Potential Ecological ConcernCRDL Contract Required Detection LimitTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA xiCRQL Contract Required Quantitation LimitsCSP Charlestown State ParkCTE Central Tendency ExposureCTV Critical Toxicity ValueDAF Dilution Attenuation FactorDBT Dibutyl phthalateDDD dichlorodiphenyldiehlorethaneDDE 4, 4 DDEDDT 1, 1’ (2,2,2-Trichloroethylidene)bis[4-chlorobenzene]DERP Defense Environmental Restoration ProgramDNA Deoxyribonucleic acidDOD Department of DefenseDQCR Data Quality Control ReportsDQO Data Quality ObjectivesDS Direct Push SoilDW Direct Push WaterEECs Environmental Exposure ConcentrationsEEQ Environment Exposure QuotientEM ElectromagneticEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyEPC Exposure Point ConcentrationEQP Equilibrium-PartitioningERA Ecological Risk AssessmentERAGS Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for SuperfundERL Effects – Range - LowERM Effects – Range – MediumERT Emergency Response TeamESV Ecological Screening ValueFC Fraction IngestedFSP Field Sampling PlanGABA Gamma-aminobutyric AcidGOCO Government-Owned, Contractor-OperatedTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA xiigpm gallons per minuteGPR Ground Penetrating RadarHDPE High-Density PolyethyleneHEAST Health Effects Assessment Summary TablesHHRA Human Health Risk AssessmentHI Hazard IndexHLSC Human Life Cycle Safe ConcentrationHMW High Molecular WeightHOP Hoosier Ordnance PlantHQ Hazard QuotientHSA hollow-stem augerHSDB Hazardous Substance DatabaseICI ICI Americas, Inc.ID inner diameterIDEM Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementIDL Instrument Detection LimitIDNR Indiana Department Natural ResourcesIDW investigation-derived wastesIEUBK Integrated Exposure Uptake BiokineticINAAP Indiana Army Ammunition PlantIOW Indiana Ordnance Works Plant 1IRIS Integrated Risk Information SystemIWPCB Indiana Water Pollution Control BoardIWQC Indiana Water Quality CriteriaIOWP Indiana Ordnance Works Plant 2J/UJ Qualified Estimatedkg KilogramL/day Liter per dayLAP Load, Assemble, and PackLC LeachateLD50 Lethal dose 50LDlo Lowest Lethal DoseTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA xiiiLMW Low Molecular WeightLOAEL Lowest to Observed Adverse Effects LevelLOEC Lowest Observation Effect concentrationsLOQ Limits of QuantitationMATC Maximum Acceptable Toxicant ConcentrationMCL Maximum Contaminant LevelME Measurement Endpointmg/day milligrams per daymg/kg milligram per kilogrammg/m3 milligram per cubic metermL milliliterMS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike DuplicateMSL Mean Sea LevelMW Monitoring WellNCEA National Center for Environmental AssessmentNOAEL No Observable Adverse Effects LevelNOD Notice of DeficiencyNPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemOD outside diameterORNL Oak Ridge National LaboratoryP&E Propellants and ExplosivesPA Preliminary AssessmentPAH Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonPCB Polychlorinated BiphenylPEL Probable – Effects – LevelPPE Personal Protective Equipmentppm parts per millionPRG Preliminary Remediation GoalsPVC Polyvinyl ChlorideQA Quality AssuranceQAPP Quality Assurance Project PlanQC Quality ControlTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA xivQSAR Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships“R” RejectedRAGS Risk Assessment Guidance for SuperfundRBC Risk-Based ConcentrationRCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery ActRDA Recommended Daily AllowanceRfD Reference DoseRFD-I Reference Inhalation DoseRFI RCRA Facility InvestigationRI Remedial InvestigationRISC Risk Integrated System of ClosureRME Recommended Maximum ExposureRNA Ribonucleic acidROC Receptor of ConcernSAP Sampling and Analysis PlanSARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization ActSB Soil BoringSCEM Site Conceptual Exposure ModelSCFS Sample Collection Field SheetsSD SedimentSERA Screening-Level Ecological Risk AssessmentSF-SH Slope Factor-Sulfhydryl ligandsSOP Standard Operating ProcedureSP SpringSS Shallow SoilSVOC Semivolatile Organic CompoundSW Surface WaterSWQC Surface Water Quality CriteriaTAL Target Analyte ListTCL Target Compound ListTCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureTDS Total Dissolved SolidsTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev3(revised final).doc\6-Aug-02 /OMA xvTEL Threshold – Effects – LevelTNT TrinitrotouleneToxNet Toxicity Data NetworkTPH Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsTRV Toxicity Reference ValueTSS Total Suspended Solids“U” Qualified Nondetectμg/kg microgram per kilogramμg/L microgram per Literμg/m3 microgram per cubic meterUCL Upper Confidence LimitURSGWC URS Greiner Woodward ClydeUSACE U.S. Army Corps of EngineersUSATHAMA U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials AgencyUSCS Unified Soil Classification SystemUSDA U.S. Department of AgricultureUSEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSGS U.S. Geologic SurveyUST Underground Storage TankUTL Upper Tolerance LimitVOC Volatile Organic CompoundW-C Woodward-ClydeExecutive Summary Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA ES-1The following includes the results of the Phase II RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) completedat the Aniline Pond (Site 5) at the Indiana Army Ammunition Plant (INAAP). The report alsosummarizes the results of the previously completed Phase I Remedial Investigation (RI).INAAP currently encompasses approximately 9,790 acres in south-central Clark County,Indiana. Its southern boundary is approximately 6 miles north of Jeffersonville, Indiana and 10miles from the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan area, which lies to the south across the OhioRiver. INAAP is a Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated, inactive military industrialinstallation. The Army intends to transfer the property to the Local Reuse Authority forcommercial development or to the State of Indiana for inclusion in the state park system. TheAniline Pond is one of 90 sites identified at INAAP.The Plant was originally constructed as three separate facilities: The Indiana Ordnance WorksPlant 1, the Hoosier Ordnance Plant, and the Indiana Works Plant 2. The three facilities wereconsolidated into the Indiana Arsenal in 1945. The Indiana Arsenal was redesignated as theIndiana Ordnance Plant in 1961; in August 1963, it was redesignated again as the Indiana ArmyAmmunition Plant.Topography at the INAAP can be described as a middle-aged karst topography. Karsttopography is produced by the dissolution of limestone, gypsum, or other readily soluble rocks,commonly along joints, fractures, bedding planes, or other such features. The dissolutionprocess results in the formation of sinkholes, caves, and underground drainage. Numeroussinkholes and springs are found throughout much of INAAP.Approximately 96 percent of INAAP’s land surface drains directly into the Ohio River via sevendrainage basins. The remaining 4 percent reaching the Ohio River indirectly through thePheasant Run basin.Groundwater at INAAP is present in the bedrock formations of the upland areas and in theterrace/floodplain sand and gravel deposits located within the Ohio River valley. Thegroundwater present in the floodplain aquifer along the Ohio River is a major water supplysource. Groundwater is not usually found in the thin soil layer covering the bedrock surface inthe upland areas. When present, shallow groundwater typically mingles with surface water byflowing in and out of karst features.The Phase I and II investigations at the Aniline Pond included the completion of ten soil borings,the collection and analysis of 29 surface water and subsurface soil samples, seven collocatedsurface water/sediment samples and four groundwater samples. Chemical analysis includedVOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, PCBs, nitroaromatics/nitramines, various wet chemistry parametersand geotechnical analysis.The Aniline Pond covers approximately 1.4 acres and has a capacity of about 3000 cubic yards.During the World War II and the Korean Conflict, the pond received wastewater from theproduction of nitrobenzene, aniline, diphenylamine, and dimethylamine. The Aniline Pond issituated in an upland area characterized by karst topography and is located in a topographic lowat the head of the Jenny Lind Run drainage basin. The ground surface surrounding the site isabout 5 feet higher than the ground surface within the site. An earthen dike at the south endExecutive Summary Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA ES-2separates the Aniline Pond from the South Ash Settling Basin (Site 4). The site is covered withgrass, weeds, and trees and some water.Local surficial geology at the Aniline Pond consists of up to 10 feet of process waste materialsunderlain by residual clay and bedrock. Bedrock was encountered at depths ranging 4.9 to 10.2feet below ground surface (bgs). Th maximum depth of surface water ranged from 0.5 to 1.5feet. Groundwater was encountered at each boring at depths ranging from 0.3 to 2.3 feet bgs.There was no evidence of any significant karst features.A contamination assessment was completed for near surface soil and sediment, subsurface soil,surface water, and groundwater. Elevated levels of one SVOC and twonitroaromatics/nitramines compounds were detected in near surface soil and sediment samples.One VOC, two SVOCs and four nitroaromatics/nitramines were detected at elevated levels insubsurface soil samples. Elevated levels of target compounds were not detected in surface waterand groundwater samples. Several metals results exceeded background concentrations for allmedia sampled.Future land use in the Aniline Pond area will be for industrial / commercial use only. Thereforea human health risk assessment evaluated the on-site worker, excavation worker, and hunterscenarios. The results indicate that the potential primary carcinogenic risk drivers are ingestionof arsenic in deer tissue and the incidental ingestion of arsenic from soil. The potential primarynon-carcinogenic risk driver is ingestion of iron, arsenic and thallium in surface soil andsediment. The cancer risks ranged from 3 x10-7 to 3 x 10-6 for the Recommended MaximumExposure (RME) and 5 x 10-8 to 2 x 10-7 for Central Tendency Exposure (CTE). Hazard indicesranged from 0.015 to 1.52 for RME and 0.01 to 0.7 for CTE.The Aniline Pond sits within the Jenny Lind Run drainage basin. Downgradient portions of thedrainage basin are expected to become part of the existing state park system. Several pathwayswere evaluated as part of a ecological risk assessment. However, the key ecological risk driversare considered to be those chemicals of ecological concern that appear to have a potentialadverse impact on the more wide-ranging transient receptors of concern who may receiveadditional exposures(s) to other areas of potential contamination. These chemicals of concernhave a potential for adverse effects beyond the administrative boundaries of the Aniline Pond.They include the 1st order avian carnivores exposed to DDT and mercury as well as those caveresources potentially exposed to copper, zinc, N-nitrosodiphenylamine (diphenylamine), andmanganese that is possibly being released to underground springs.Data of sufficient quality and quantity has been collected to characterize the Aniline Pond.Physical and chemical investigation results indicate that there are potential ecological concernswhile human health concerns are less significant. Based on the results of the Phase I RI andPhase II RFI a Corrective Measures Study has been recommended to evaluate variousalternatives to reduce ecological and human exposures to acceptable levels.Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 1-1The Aniline Pond (Site 5) is located in the northwest portion of the Indiana Army AmmunitionPlant (INAAP) within the Propellants and Explosives (P&E) Area (Site 63). The Aniline Pond isbordered by:· North - railroad tracks, OrganicsRaw Material Storage (Building921), and a field of grass andweeds· South - South Ash Settling Basin(Site 4) and field of grass andweeds· East - Electric Substation (Facility501-27), Benzene Storage(Building 902), grove of trees, anda field of grass and weeds· West - railroad tracks, “D” Avenue, and a field of grass and weeds.The Aniline Pond occupies approximately 1.4 acres and has a holding capacity of about 3,000cubic yards (ASI 1994). A pipe located near the northern end of the pond (see Figure 1-1) servesas the inlet to the pond. The Aniline Pond is positioned just upstream from and north of theSouth Ash Settling Basin. An earthen dike at the south end of Aniline Pond separates the twosites.1.1 OPERATIONAL HISTORY AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICSBased on interviews, aerial photographs, a record review, and site reconnaissance, the followingoperational history and waste characteristics were determined:The Aniline Pond was utilized from 1940 through 1957 and is currently inactive. During WorldWar II and the Korean Conflict, the Aniline Pond received wastewater from the production ofnitrobenzene, aniline, diphenylamine, and dimethylaniline, and may have received nitrocellulosewaste (USATHAMA 1980). Several chemicals were involved in the production of these organiccompounds including: benzene, nitric acid, sulfuric acid, elemental iron, ferric chloride catalyst,ammonium chloride, methanol, sodium carbonate, an ethyl alcohol-diethyl ether/dinitrotoluenemixture, diphenylamine, and dibutylphthalate.No overflow structures connecting the Aniline Pond to the South Ash Settling Basin wereobserved during the site reconnaissance or the field efforts, nor was any evidence found ofoverflow structures during record searches. However, according to site plans (Indiana OrdnanceWorks Map 2645, Sheet 16, 1942), an overflow structure located in the southeast corner of thepond discharged into a 36-inch vitrified clay pipe identified as a process waste sewer. Thissewer line emptied into an outfall structure (Map 2646, Sheet 17) located further east, beforeSite Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 1-2emptying into the Jenny Lind Run, which later emptied into the P & E Flume. Map 2645, Sheet16 also indicates that the Aniline Pond received sanitary waste from at least one septic tank.During the 1995 site reconnaissance, the 1996 sampling event, and the 2000 sampling event,water was observed in the pond. The maximum depth of water present in the pond during thesesite visits ranged from approximately 0.5 to 1.5 feet. Water in the area of the inlet was heavilyiron-stained. During the site reconnaissance in January 1995, heavy tar-like residues wereobserved on the west side of the pond. In addition, dark soil staining, coal and ashes were alsoobserved to the north and west of the pond. The dark stained soil, coal and ashes were believedto have been associated with the nearby railroad spur, and were not believed to be associatedwith waste handling activities at the Aniline Pond.1.2 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONSDames & Moore completed a Contamination Survey at the site in 1984 (D&M 1984). However,the analytical methods used are now obsolete, rendering the analytical data collected during thissurvey incomparable to the data collected, following current standards, during the Phase IRemedial Investigation (RI) and the Phase II Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)Facility Investigation (RFI); therefore, this data was not used.Woodward-Clyde completed a Phase I RI at this site in 1995 (W-C 1998).For additional information regarding the previous investigations completed at INAAP, refer toSection 3 of the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a).1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATIONThis report compiles the Phase I RI report with the results of the Phase II RFI. The remainingportion of this report is organized as follows:· Section 2 – Field Activities Summary· Section 3 – Physical Investigation Results: reviews site topography, local surficialgeology, and shallow hydrogeology· Section 4 – Data Quality Review and Validation: summarizes the results of the 100percent quality control (QC) review and the ten percent full validation· Section 5 – Chemical Investigation Results: identifies the chemical analyses and fieldduplicate samples collected; summarizes the sample detections by sampleidentification number and matrix type in tabular form· Section 6 – Contamination Assessment: presents an evaluation, both in text and onfigures, of chemicals present at the site in elevated concentrations by matrix andchemical groupSite Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 1-3· Section 7 – Human Health Risk Evaluation: examines the chemicals present invarious matrices at the site to determine if they pose a threat to human health· Section 8 – Ecological Health Risk Evaluation: examines the chemicals present invarious matrices at the site to determine if they pose a threat to the environment· Section 9 – Summary and Recommendations· Section 10 – ReferencesFor additional information, including the facility description and environmental setting, previousinvestigations, and the technical approaches used during the Phase II RFI, refer to the SitewideWork Plan (URSGWC 2000a). For additional information regarding the rational for and theobjectives of the Phase II RFI, refer to the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a).Field Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 2-1Field activities for this site included direct push soil, soil gas and groundwater sampling, andsediment, subsurface soil and surface water sampling. The locations of the sampling points areprovided on Figure 2-1. Sample location, identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysesare presented in Table 2-1 for samples collected in 1995, and in Table 2-2 for samples collectedin 2000. All field activities were completed in accordance with applicable Standard OperatingProcedures (SOPs) (W-C 1998, URSGWC 2000b). Any deviations from the SOPs are noted onthe Sample Collection Field Sheets (SCFS), provided in Appendix G.2.1 DIRECT PUSH SOIL, SOIL GAS AND GROUNDWATER SURVEYAs part of the Phase I RI, a direct push soil, soil gas and groundwater survey was completed atthe Aniline Pond in order to identify the presence or absence of volatile organic compounds(VOCs) in soil, soil gas and groundwater, and to assist in locating additional soil borings. Thesoil, soil gas and groundwater samples were positioned in a grid pattern and collected from areasof the site that were not covered with water. One soil gas, 15 soil, and 10 groundwater sampleswere collected using direct push technology and analyzed onsite using a mobile laboratory. Foradditional information on the direct push soil, soil gas and groundwater survey at Aniline Pond,refer to Section 5 of the Draft Final Phase I RI Report (W-C 1998).2.2 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYAn electrical resistivity survey was completed as part of the Phase II RFI investigation.Electrodes were spaced at five-foot intervals. The north-south transect was completed in twoarrays due to the length of the basin and the short electrode spacing. The results of this surveyare discussed in Section 3.2.2.3 SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING2.3.1 SoilTen borings were located in areas of suspected contamination based on the direct push soil, soilgas and groundwater sampling results (see Section 2.1), geophysical survey data (see Section2.2), and historical information. Borings 05SB01 through 05SB06 were drilled at the followinglocations (see Figure 2-1) using hollow stem augers (4 ¼-inch inner diameter, 8-inch outerdiameter) and a 3-inch diameter stainless steel split spoon:· 05SB01 through 05SB03 - Along the east edge of the pond· 05SB04 - Adjacent to the northwest side of the earthen dike· 05SB05 and 05SB06 - In the southwest portion of the pond.Borings 05SB07 through 05SB10 were completed at the following locations (see Figure 2-1)using a direct push system and 1.75-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) liners. Thelocations were selected based on the previous investigation results, and the electrical resistivitysurvey results.Field Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 2-2· 05SB07 – At the northern end of Electrical Resistivity Transect #1, Array #1· 05SB08 – On the eastern edge of the pond, along Electrical Resistivity Transect #3· 05SB09 – On the western edge of the pond, along Electrical Resistivity Transect #2· 05SB10 – On the eastern edge of the pond, along Electrical Resistivity Transect #2.Typically, three samples were collected for chemical analysis from each boring. An additionalbasin sediment sample was collected from 0 to 2 feet below ground surface (bgs) adjacent to05SB05 and underwent Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) extraction prior tochemical analysis. Sample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented inTables 2-1 and 2-2. Boring locations are shown in Figure 2-1.Six geotechnical samples were collected from the Aniline Pond during the Phase II RFI. Theanalytical results from these geotechnical samples are presented in Table F-1 in Appendix F.2.3.2 SedimentSeven sediment samples were collected from beneath areas of standing water along the westernhalf and the southeastern corner of the pond. These samples were collocated with the surfacewater samples discussed in Section 2.5. The sediment samples were collected from thefollowing locations (see Figure 2-1):· 05SD01 and 05SD02 – From beneath standing water adjacent to the earthen dike· 05SD03 and 05SD04 – From beneath standing water in the central portion of thepond· 05SD05, 05SD06 and 05SD07 – From beneath standing water near the inlet to thepond.Sediment samples 05SD01 through 05SD05 were collected from 0 to 2 feet bgs. Sedimentsample 05SD06 encountered auger refusal at approximately 0.3 feet bgs; therefore, it wascollected from 0 to 0.3 feet bgs. Sediment sample 05SD07 was collected from 0 to 0.2 feet bgs.Sample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.Sample locations are shown in Figure 2-1.2.4 GROUNDWATER SAMPLINGGroundwater samples were collected from the direct push borings, 05SB07 through 05SB10. Itwas not possible to collect a sufficient quantity of groundwater from boring 05SB07 during theinitial sampling interval. Therefore, in order to obtain a sufficient quantity, the groundwatersample was collected from this location during three intervals over a 42-hour period.Slotted, PVC standpipes were used during the collection of groundwater samples from all fourborings. Samples for VOCs analysis were collected using a stainless steel minibailer. Prior tothe collection of samples for other analyses, at least 500 milliliters (mL) of water were purgedField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 2-3from each boring using a peristaltic pump and high density polyethylene (HDPE) tubing.Samples for other analyses were collected using the peristaltic pump and HDPE tubing.Sample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.Boring locations are shown in Figure 2-1.2.5 SURFACE WATER SAMPLINGSeven surface water samples were collected from areas of standing water along the western halfand the southeastern corner of the pond. These samples were collocated with the sedimentsamples discussed in Section 2.3.2. The surface water samples were collected from thefollowing locations (see Figure 2-1):· 05SW01 and 05SW02 – From the standing water adjacent to the earthen dike· 05SW03 and 05SW04 – From the standing water in the central portion of the pond· 05SW05, 05SW06 and 05SW07 – From the standing water near the inlet to the pond.Sample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.Sample locations are shown in Figure 2-1.2.6 FIELD SCREENING RESULTSField screening was completed during both investigations using headspace analysis. Recoveredsoil from each boring and sediment sample was field screened using a photoionization detector(PID) to verify the presence or absence of organic vapors. Headspace results are presented inTable 2-3 and were recorded on the boring logs (see Appendix E) and the Sample CollectionField Sheets (SCFSs) (see Appendix G).2.7 IDW DISPOSITIONInvestigation-derived wastes (IDW) including soil cuttings, development and purge water,decontamination fluids, and personal protective equipment (PPE) were containerized inaccordance with the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a). Disposal of the IDW containershas been documented in the “IDW Disposition Technical Memorandum” (URS 2001).TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDSample Sample Sample Sample ParametersLocation Identification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3Nitroaromatics/ Nitramines4 Nitrate/Nitrite5 TCLP6 Comments05SB01 0501SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X X0501SB08 6-8 Soil/Sediment X X X X X0501SB10 8-10 Soil X X X X X05SB02 0502SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X X0502SB08 6-8 Soil/Sediment X X X X X0502SB10 8-10 Soil X X X X X05SB03 0503SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X X0503SB06 4-6 Sediment X X X X X0503SB10 8-10 Soil X X X X X05SB04 0504SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X X0504SB04 2-4 Sediment X X X X X0504SB10 8-10 Soil X X X X X05SB05 0505SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X X0505SB06 4-6 Soil/Sediment X X X X X0505SB10 8-10 Soil X X X X X MS/MSD0507SB02 0-2 Sediment X05SB06 0506SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X X0512SB02 0-2 Sediment X X X X XDuplicate(0506SB02)0506SB06 4-6 Soil X X X X X0506SB10 8-8.55 Soil X X X X X05SD01 0501SD00 0-2 Sediment X X X X X MS/MSD05SD02 0502SD00 0-2 Sediment X X X X X05SD03 0503SD00 0-2 Sediment X X X X X05SD04 0504SD00 0-2 Sediment X X X X X05SD05 0505SD00 0-2 Sediment X X X X X05SD06 0506SD00 0-0.3 Sediment X X X X X0516SD00 0-0.3 Sediment X X X X XDuplicate(0506SD00)Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Sheet 1 of 2 4/25/02TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDSample Sample Sample Sample ParametersLocation Identification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3Nitroaromatics/ Nitramines4 Nitrate/Nitrite5 TCLP6 Comments05SW01 0501SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X MS/MSD05SW02 0502SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X05SW03 0503SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X05SW04 0504SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X05SW05 0505SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X05SW06 0506SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X0516SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X XDuplicate(0506SW00)Notes: Abbreviations:Samples were collected in 1996. ft = feet1 TCL Volatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Method 5030 / Analysis Method 8260A. SB = Soil Boring2 TCL Semivolatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 3520 (aqueous) and 3550 (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8270. SD = Sediment3 TAL Metals: Preparation Methods 3010/3020 (aqueous) and 3050B (soil) / Analysis Methods 6010/7000. SW = Suface Water4 Nitroaromatics/nitramines were prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 8330. MS/MSD = Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate5 Nitrate/Nitrite was prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 300. Duplicate = Quality Control Duplicate6 Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) chemicals (original sample ID in parentheses)for extraction prior to method list Contract Laboratory Program(CLP)Surface soil samples collected (from 0.0 to 2.0 ft bgs) during thePhase I RI use 02 for the depth indicator portion of the SampleIdentification.All samples to be analyzed for chemical analysis were shippedEmax Laboratory, Inc, of Torrance, California.bgs = Below Ground SurfaceNA = Not ApplicableQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Sheet 2 of 2 4/25/02TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDSample Sample Sample SampleIdentification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines4 Pesticides/PCBs5 TOC6 Cyanide7 TDS/TSS8 Geotech9 Comments05SB07 0507DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X X0507DS03 2.3-3.3 Soil X0507DS04 2.3-3.3 Soil X0507DS06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X0507DS08 7.0-8.0 Soil X X X X X0507DW08 8.0 Groundwater X X X X Limited Recovery05SB08 0508DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X X0508DS02 1.0-1.7 Soil X0508DS03 2.0-3.0 Soil X0508DS03 2.0-3.0 Soil X0508DS06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X0508DS10 8.0-9.5 Soil X X X X X0508DW10 9.5 Groundwater X X X X X X X0568DW10 9.5 Groundwater X X X X X X XDuplicate(0508DW10)05SB09 0509DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X X0569DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X XDuplicate(0509DS00)0509DS02 1.0-1.8 Soil X0509DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X0509DS05 3.5-5.0 Soil X0509DS05 3.5-4.9 Soil X0509DW05 5.0 Groundwater X X X X X X X05SB10 0510DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X X MS/MSD0510DS02 1.0-1.7 Soil X0510DS04 3.0-3.7 Soil X X0510DS06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X0510DS10 8.0-10.0 Soil X X X X X X0510DW03 3.0 Groundwater X X X X X X XParametersLocationQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Sheet 1 of 2 4/25/02TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDSample Sample Sample SampleIdentification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines4 Pesticides/PCBs5 TOC6 Cyanide7 TDS/TSS8 Geotech9 CommentsParametersLocation05SW/SD07 0507SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X X0507SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X XNotes: Abbreviations:Samples were collected in 2000.1 TCL Volatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 5030 (aqueous/sediment) and 5035 (soil) / Analysis Method 8260B. DW = Direct Push - Groundwater2 TCL Semivolatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8270C. SB = Soil Boring3 TAL Metals: Preparation Method 3010A (aqueous) and 3050B (soil) / Analysis Methods 6010B/7470A (mercury). SD = Sediment4 Nitroaromatics/nitramines were prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 8330. SW = Surface Water5 TCL Pesticides and PCBs: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) / Analysis Methods 8081A (Pesticides) and 8082 (PCBs). MS/MSD = Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate also requested6 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) was prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 415.1. Duplicate = Quality Control Duplicate (original sample ID in parentheses)7 Cyanide was prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 335.2.8 Total Dissolved Solids/Total Suspended Solids (TDS/TSS) were prepared and analyzed as identified in Methods 160.1/160.2.9 Geotechnical ParametersSurface soil samples collected (from 0.0 to 2.0 ft bgs) during the Phase II RFI use 00 for thedepth indicator portion of the Sample Identification.Geotechnical analytical parameters varied from sample to sample, depending on depth, soiltype, etc. Refer to Appendix F for a complete summary of all geotechnical analyses.All samples to be analyzed for chemical analysis were shipped Emax Laboratory, Inc, ofTorrance, California.bgs = below ground surfaceDS = Direct Push-Soilft = feetQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Sheet 2 of 2 4/25/02TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANICVAPORS IN SOIL SAMPLESSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)105SB01 0-2 16-8 408-10 705SB02 0-2 26-8 358-10 ND05SB03 0-2 144-6 988-10 405SB04 0-2 182-4 138-10 ND05SB05 0-2 1.54-6 308-10 105SB06 0-2 ND4-6 28-8.55 ND05SB07 0.5-1.0 ND4.0-6.0 ND7.0-8.0 ND05SB08 0.5-1.0 ND4.0-6.0 ND8.0-9.5 ND05SB09 0.5-1.0 ND3.0-4.0 ND05SB10 0.5-1.0 ND4.0-6.0 2858.0-10.0 3405SD01 0-2 305SD02 0-2 405SD03 0-2 ND05SD04 0-2 605SD05 0-2 1105SD06 0-0.3 ND05SD07 0.0-0.2 NANotes:1 Measured response above background using a photoinization detector.Samples from borings 05SB01 through 05SB06 and 05SD01 through 05SD06 were collectedfrom 1996. Samples from borings 05SB07 through 05SB10 and 05SD07 were collectedfrom 2000.Abbreviations:ft = Feet SD = Sediment Samplebgs = Below Ground Surface ND = Not Detectedppm = Part Per Million NA = Not Available Due to Insufficient Sample RecoverySB = Soil BoringQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Sheet 1 of 1 4/25/02Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 3-13.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE FEATURESThe surface features at the site are shown on Figure 1-1. The Aniline Pond is situated in anUpland area characterized by karst topography associated with shallow limestone bedrock. Thepond was built in a topographic low near the head of the Jenny Lind Run. The ground surfaceelevation surrounding the pond is about 5 feet higher than the ground surface within the pond.The surface of the pond is covered with water, grass, weeds, and trees. The maximum depth ofwater present in the pond during the site visits ranged from approximately 0.5 to 1.5 feet. Theeast bank of the pond is covered with a thick growth of trees and the north, south and west banksare covered with grass, weeds, and scattered trees. An earthen dike is located at the south end ofthe pond.The pond is located in the Jenny Lind Run drainage basin. Surface water from the siteevaporates into the atmosphere and infiltrates into the groundwater network.A review of a historical 1937 U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map(USGS 1937a) shows that the Aniline Pond was constructed within an existing drainage. Basedon a comparison between the 1937 map and a 1950 revised USGS topographic map (USGS1937b), it appears that the dam at the south end of the pond was constructed during the facility’sdevelopment.3.2 LOCAL SURFICIAL GEOLOGYThe local surficial geology of this site has been interpreted based on the results of the electricalresistivity survey, ten soil borings, seven sediment samples, and the geotechnical analysis of sixsoil samples.Borings 05SB01 and 05SB04 were each drilled to a depth of 10 feet bgs. Borings 05SB02,05SB03, 05SB05, and 05SB06 encountered refusal at depths ranging from 8.6 to 9.8 feet bgs.Borings 05SB07 through 05SB10 encountered refusal ranging from 4.9 to 10.2. Refusalsuggested that bedrock might have been encountered.As part of the electrical resistivity survey completed during the Phase II RFI, three transects werepositioned across the pond basin as shown on Figure 2-1. The results of the survey are presentedin Figures 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4. All simplified boring logs from both investigations arepresented in Figure 3-5. The general stratigraphy is depicted in two schematic geologic crosssections shown in Figure 3-6. These sections were generated by a qualified geologist from theboring logs using RockWorks99Ò geologic mapping software. Elevations in feet Mean SeaLevel (MSL) on the figures are based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988.The electrical resistivity of subsurface materials can be affected by a number of differentphysical characteristics. Physical characteristics that act to reduce electrical resistivity includeincreasing water content, increasing salinity of groundwater, increasing clay content, andPhysical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 3-2decreasing grain size. Additionally, the presence of water-filled voids such as fractures or porespaces and other primary or secondary porosity features lower electrical resistivity.Conversely, an absence or decrease in water content, a decrease in void space, porosity, orfracturing and an increasing degree of compaction or lithification can act to increase theelectrical resistivity. Typical ranges of electrical resistivities of various materials are as follows:Materials Resistivity(Ohm-Meters)Wet to moist clayey soil and wet clay 1s to 10swet to moist silty clay soil and silty clay Low 10sWet to moist silty and sandy soils 10s to 1000sWell-fractured to slightly fractured rock with moist,soil-filled cracks100sSand and gravel with layers of silt Low 1000sSlightly fractured rock with dry, soil-filled cracks Low 1000sCoarse, dry sand and gravel deposits High 1000sMassively bedded rock High 1000sNote: Adapted from H.R. Burger, 1992, Exploration Geophysics of the Shallow SubsurfaceElectrical Resistivity Transects #1and #2 indicate a zone of very high resistivity in the centralportion of the pond, with areas of lower resistivities at the northern and southern ends. Theinterpreted bedrock surface is based on the resistivity values and on the depth of refusal from theborings. The area of higher resistivity encountered in Transects #1 and #2 is likely due to achange in rock characteristics, such as the presence of a shale layer, a difference in mineralogy,or a variation in the degree of weathering. The magnitude of the difference in resistivitiesbetween the north end and central portion of the basin (Transect #1) causes the modelingsoftware to map the contours as shown, and has not been interpreted as indication of a void oranother anomaly. Transects #3 and #4 indicate that the bedrock surface follows the shape of thebasin on the west side of the basin. Transect #4 indicates the bedrock surface dips slightly to theeast.The surficial geology consists of up to approximately 10 feet of silty clay process wastematerials overlying either residual clay soils or limestone bedrock. The bedrock surface appearsto slope toward the east-southeast. Residual soils were typically encountered below the processwaste materials along the edges of the basin. Process waste materials were thickest near thecenter and southeastern corner of the basin. The resistivity survey and soil borings did notindicate any significant karst or bedrock surface features.The process waste materials are typically described as soft, wet, gray to black, low plastic siltyclay to organic clay and clayey silt, based on field observations and the results of geotechnicaltests (Table F-1 in Appendix F). This material has been interpreted as process sedimentsresulting from the discharge of industrial wastewater into the Aniline Pond.Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 3-3Underlying this material is medium stiff to stiff, moist, low to medium plastic clay residuum.Angular rock fragments, likely chert, were observed in the residual clay along the east side of thepond (i.e., at borings 05SB01, 05SB02, and 05SB03). Loose dry to wet, weathered limestonewas observed from about 5 feet bgs at boring 05SB05. Limestone bedrock was encounteredbelow the residual clay at borings 05SB02, 05SB03, 05SB05, 05SB06, 05SB07, 05SB08,05SB09 and 05SB10 at 4.9 to 10.2 feet bgs.3.3 SHALLOW HYDROGEOLOGYWater was encountered in the borings at depths ranging from 0.3 to 2.3 feet bgs. This waterlikely is hydraulically connected to standing water in the pond. Total porosities for fourgeotechnical samples collected from the process waste materials at the Aniline Pond ranged fromabout 46% to 64% (see Appendix F).RelativeElevation(Feet)RelativeElevation(Feet)1079176614631800160 240Distance(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock Surface275NORTH SOUTH1079176614631Boring05SB07Refusal = 8 ft BGSSITE 5-ANILINE PONDELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY IMAGING RESULTSTRANSECT 1, ARRAY 1DRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 10/10/00REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-1RelativeElevation(Feet)RelativeElevation(Feet)1049891797349Distance(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceNORTH SOUTH140 180 220 260 30034555616785104989185797367615549SITE 5-ANILINE PONDELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY IMAGING RESULTSTRANSECT 1, ARRAY 2DRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 10/10/00REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-2RelativeElevation(Feet)RelativeElevation(Feet)1049891797367Distance(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceWEST EAST020401358560 80 100 110104989185797367Refusal = 4.9 ft BGS05SB09Refusal = 10.2 ft BGSBoring05SB10??SITE 5-ANILINE PONDELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY IMAGING RESULTSTRANSECT 2DRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 10/10/00REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-3WESTRelativeElevation(Feet)EASTDistance(Feet)7279859298105111 1111059892857279RelativeElevation(Feet)0 20 4060 80120 135Refusal = 9.5 ft BGSBoring05SB08SITE 5-ANILINE PONDELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY IMAGING RESULTSTRANSECT 3DRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 10/10/00REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-4Data Quality Review and ValidationSECTIONFOUR Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 4-14.1 PHASE I RIThe results for selenium and lead for the TCLP sample were rejected. Reporting limits wereelevated due to soil moisture content that ranged from 15 percent to 47 percent. See the Phase IRI report for a more detailed discussion of data review issues.4.2 PHASE II RFIAll chemical data were reviewed following procedures identified in the INAPP Site WideQuality Assurance Project Plan (URS 2000). Analytical data for select samples collected at theAniline Pond (Site 5) were qualified estimated (J/UJ) based on surrogate, LCS or field duplicaterecoveries outside evaluation criteria. Acetone, methylene chloride and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate data for many samples were qualified nondetect (U) based on the presenceof these compounds in the trip blank or laboratory method blank samples or based onprofessional judgement (common laboratory contaminants). Additionally, gamma-chlordane,potassium and thallium data (samples 0510DS06, 0507SD00 and 0507SW00 respectively) werequalified nondetect (U) based on the presence of the compounds in the laboratory method blanksample. Based on the data reviews and validations, no analytical data was qualified as R(rejected). Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision were achieved for the data. A completesummary of the data review and validation is presented in Appendix A.The analytical data for samples collected at the Aniline Pond were determined to be acceptable(including estimated data) for the intended use.Chemical Investigation ResultsSECTIONFIVE Aniline Pond, Site 5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Final\Sections 1-10\Site 5 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev2.doc\15-Apr-02 /OMA 5-1All samples collected from the Aniline Pond were analyzed for Target Compound List (TCL)VOCs, TCL semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), Target Analyte List (TAL) metals, andnitroaromatics/nitramines. Samples collected during the Phase I RI were also analyzed fornitrate/nitrite. Samples collected during the Phase II RFI were also analyzed forpesticides/polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Additionally, three groundwater samples(0508DW10, 0509DW05 and 0510DS02) collected during the Phase II RFI were analyzed fortotal suspended solids (TSS)/total dissolved solids (TDS). Field duplicate samples collectedfrom this site are identified below. Analytical results for field duplicate samples are presented inAppendix H.Field Duplicate Associated Sample0512SB02 0506SB020516SD00 0506SD000516SW00 0506SW000568DW10 0508DW100569DS00 0509DS00Summaries of the chemical investigation results can be found as follows:· Surface and subsurface soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater samplescollected from this site and the types of analyses are summarized in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.· TCLP analytical results are summarized in Table 5-1.· Chemicals detected, maximum concentration, and frequency of detects for soil andsediment samples collected from the Aniline Pond are summarized in Table 5-2.· Chemicals detected, maximum concentration, and frequency of detects for surfacewater and groundwater samples collected from the Aniline Pond are summarized inTable 5-3.· Appendix H contains all analytical results.TABLE 5-1COMPARISON OF CHEMICALSDETECTED IN TCLP1 SAMPLE TO REGULATORY LIMITSSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0507SB02LAB SAMPLE NUMBER B081-01COLLECT DATE 2/17/96Result RL Qual TCLP Regulatory Limit 2VOLATILE ORGANICS (μg/L) < 10 U N/A1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 10 U N/A1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 10 U N/A1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 10 U N/A1,1-Dichloroethane < 10 U N/A1,1-Dichloroethene < 10 U 7001,2-Dichloroethane < 10 U 5001,2-Dichloroethene (Total) < 10 U N/A1,2-Dichloropropane < 10 U N/A2-Butanone < 10 U 2000002-Hexanone < 10 U N/A4-Methyl-2-pentanone < 10 U N/AAcetone 15 N/ABenzene 1 500Bromodichloromethane < 10 U N/ABromoform < 10 U N/ABromomethane < 10 U N/ACarbon Disulfide < 10 U N/ACarbon Tetrachloride < 10 U 500Chlorobenzene < 10 U 100000Chloroethane < 10 U N/AChloroform < 10 U 6000Chloromethane < 10 U N/Acis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 10 U N/ADibromochloromethane < 10 U N/AEthylbenzene 0.9 J N/AMethylene Chloride 37 N/AStyrene < 10 U N/ATetrachloroethene < 10 U 700Toluene 0.7 J N/Atrans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 10 U N/ATrichloroethene < 10 U 500Vinyl chloride < 10 U 200Xylenes (Total) < 11 U N/ASEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (μg/L)1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene < 10 U N/A1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 10 U N/A1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 10 U N/A1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 10 U 75002,2-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) < 10 U N/A2,4,5-Trichlorophenol < 25 U 4000002,4,6-Tricholorphenol < 10 U 20002,4-Dichlorophenol < 10 U N/A2,4-Dimethylphenol < 10 U N/A2,4-Dinitrophenol < 25 U N/A2,4-Dinitrotoluene < 10 U 1302,6-Dinitrotoluene < 10 U N/A2-Chloronaphthalene < 10 U N/AQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2Page 1 of 4 4/25/02TABLE 5-1COMPARISON OF CHEMICALSDETECTED IN TCLP1 SAMPLE TO REGULATORY LIMITSSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0507SB02LAB SAMPLE NUMBER B081-01COLLECT DATE 2/17/96Result RL Qual TCLP Regulatory Limit 2SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (μg/L) (Contd)2-Chlorophenol < 10 U N/A2-Methylnaphthalene 2 J N/A2-Methylphenol < 10 U 2000002-Nitroaniline < 25 U N/A2-Nitrophenol < 10 U N/A3,3-Dichlorobenzidine < 10 U N/A3-Nitroaniline < 25 U N/A4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol < 25 U N/A4-Bromophenyl-phenylether < 10 U N/A4-Chloro-3methylphenol < 10 U N/A4-Chloroaniline < 10 U N/A4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether < 10 U N/A4-Methylphenol < 10 U 2000004-Nitroaniline < 25 U N/A4-Nitrophenol < 25 U N/AAcenaphthene < 10 U N/AAcenaphthylene < 10 U N/AAnthracene < 10 U N/ABenzo(a)anthracene < 10 U N/ABenzo(a)pyrene < 10 U N/ABenzo(b)fluoranthene < 10 U N/ABenzo(g,h,i)perylene < 10 U N/ABenzo(k)fluoranthene < 10 U N/Abis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane < 10 U N/Abis(2-Chloroethyl)ether < 10 U N/Abis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate < 10 U N/AButylbenzylphthalate < 10 U N/ACarbazole 4 J N/AChrysene < 10 U N/ADi-n-butylphthalate < 10 U N/ADi-n-octylphthalate < 10 U N/ADibenz(a,h)anthracene < 10 U N/ADibenzofuran < 10 U N/ADiethylphthalate 0.3 J N/ADimethylphthalate < 10 U N/AFluoranthene < 10 U N/AFluorene < 10 U N/AHexachlorobenzene < 10 U 130Hexachlorobutadiene < 10 U 500Hexachlorocyclopentadiene < 10 U N/AHexachloroethane < 10 U 3000Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene < 10 U N/AIsophorone < 10 U N/AN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine < 10 U N/AN-nitrosodiphenylamine 3200 3 N/ANaphthalene 2 J N/ANitrobenzene < 10 U 2000Pentachlorophenol < 25 U 100000Phenanthrene 0.3 J N/AQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2Page 2 of 4 4/25/02TABLE 5-1COMPARISON OF CHEMICALSDETECTED IN TCLP1 SAMPLE TO REGULATORY LIMITSSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0507SB02LAB SAMPLE NUMBER B081-01COLLECT DATE 2/17/96Result RL Qual TCLP Regulatory Limit 2SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (μg/L) (Contd)Phenol < 10 U N/APyrene < 10 U 5000PESTICIDES/PCBS (μg/L)4,4-DDD < 0.1 U N/A4,4-DDE 0.03 J N/A4,4-DDT < 0.1 U N/AAldrin < 0.05 U N/Aalpha-BHC < 0.05 U N/Aalpha-Chlordane < 0.05 U N/AAroclor-1016 < 1 U N/AAroclor-1221 < 2 U N/AAroclor-1232 < 1 U N/AAroclor-1242 < 1 U N/AAroclor-1248 < 1 U N/AAroclor-1254 < 1 U N/AAroclor-1260 < 1 U N/Abeta-BHC < 0.09 U N/Adelta-BHC < 0.1 U N/ADieldrin < 0.1 U N/AEndosulfan I < 0.1 U N/AEndosulfan II < 0.1 U N/AEndosulfan sulfate < 0.1 U N/AEndrin < 0.1 U 20Endrin aldehyde < 0.1 U N/AEndrin ketone < 0.1 U N/Agamma-BHC (Lindane) < 0.05 U 400gamma-Chlordane < 0.05 U 30Heptachlor < 0.05 U 8Heptachlor epoxide < 0.05 U 8Methoxychlor < 0.05 U 10000Toxaphene < 5 U 500METALS (μg/L)Aluminum < 300 U N/AAntimony < 400 U N/AArsenic < 160 U 5000Barium 335 J 100000Beryllium < 20 U N/ACadmium < 40 U 1000Calcium 25400 U N/AChromium < 100 U 5000Cobalt 103 J N/ACopper < 50 U N/AIron 119000 N/ALead R 5000Magnesium < 5000 U N/AManganese 13300 N/AMercury < 0.2 U 200Nickel 1870 N/APotassium < 12000 U N/AQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2Page 3 of 4 4/25/02TABLE 5-1COMPARISON OF CHEMICALSDETECTED IN TCLP1 SAMPLE TO REGULATORY LIMITSSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0507SB02LAB SAMPLE NUMBER B081-01COLLECT DATE 2/17/96Result RL Qual TCLP Regulatory Limit 2METALS (μg/L) (Cond)Selenium R 1000Silver < 80 U 5000Sodium < 1670000 U N/AThallium < 140 U N/AVanadium < 60 U N/AZinc 212 U N/A1 TCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure2 TCLP Regulatory Limits published in 40 CFR Part 261 Appendix II3 Result for N-nitrosodiphenylamine was taken from diluted sampleData Qualifiers: U = Non-detectJ = Estimated ValueR = Rejected Dataμg/2 = microgram per literN/A = not applicableQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2Page 4 of 4 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0501SB02 0501SB08 0501SB10 0501SD00 0502SB02DATE COLLECTED February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 36 < 17 U < 13 U < 13 U < 15 U < 13 U2-Butanone 62 9 / 36 < 17 U 29 35 < 15 U < 13 UAcetone 300 27 / 36 12 J 100 130 78 17Benzene 2400 26 / 36 4 J 920 590 J 3 J 230Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36 < 17 U < 13 U < 13 U < 15 U < 13 UChlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36 < 17 U < 13 U < 13 U < 15 U < 13 UEthylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36 < 17 U < 13 U < 13 U < 15 U 5 Jm/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36 < 17 U 16 J 31 J 5 J < 13 Uo-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36 < 17 U < 13 U < 13 U < 15 U < 13 UToluene 130 J 15 / 36 < 17 U 3 J 4 J < 15 U 6 JXylenes, total 520 6 / 26 < 17 U < 13 U < 13 U < 15 U 4 JSEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U 160 JAcenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UAcenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UAnthracene 510 J 6 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U 100 JBenzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U 450Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U 290 JBenzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36 140 J < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U 560Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UBenzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36 110 J 77 J 75 J < 1500 U 100 JButylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UCarbazole 18000 24 / 36 170 J 570 < 430 U 440 J 1300Chrysene 1900 13 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U 450Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36 83 J 100 J 35 J 6000 170 JDi-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UDibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 1 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0501SB02 0501SB08 0501SB10 0501SD00 0502SB02DATE COLLECTED February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UDimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UFluoranthene 3000 19 / 36 160 J 60 J < 430 U < 1500 U 770Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UN-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36 1700 13000 1200 19000 180000Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36 < 570 U < 440 U < 430 U < 1500 U < 420 UNitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36 < 570 U 4900 120 J < 1500 U 200 JPhenanthrene 3000 21 / 36 70 J 66 J < 430 U 460 J 660Pyrene 2600 21 / 36 190 J 76 J < 430 U 560 J 980PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 12Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 2 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0501SB02 0501SB08 0501SB10 0501SD00 0502SB02DATE COLLECTED February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 U1,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 U2,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 U2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 U2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 36 880 < 535 U < 522 U 3600 J < 511 U2-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 U3-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 U4-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36 < 696 U < 535 U < 522 U < 603 U < 511 UMETALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36 5100 7590 5320 940 191Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36 < 13.9 UJ < 10.7 UJ < 10.4 UJ 16.8 J < 10.2 UJArsenic 150 36 / 36 45.5 33.8 10.1 116 137Barium 371 36 / 36 72.5 267 258 20.3 J 12 JBeryllium 2.38 19 / 36 0.79 J 1 J 0.83 J < 0.6 U < 0.51 UCadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36 < 1.4 U < 1.1 U < 1 U < 1.2 U < 1 UCalcium 217000 36 / 36 6690 2710 2330 1520 480 JChromium 771 J 36 / 36 180 J 73 J 14.7 J 486 771 JCobalt 67.5 36 / 36 22.3 28.4 24.9 63.1 61.5Copper 1920 36 / 36 505 J 146 J 30.1 J 1420 1530 JIron 466000 J 36 / 36 201000 130000 32200 398000 J 369000Lead 744 36 / 36 73.3 33.5 22.9 132 53.2Magnesium 31800 35 / 36 1000 J 953 J 1430 244 J 137 JManganese 5490 36 / 36 1740 4030 1370 4300 3250Mercury 3.61 18 / 36 1.3 0.23 < 0.11 U 0.16 < 0.11 UNickel 550 36 / 36 105 75.1 44.6 296 274Potassium 1670 21 / 36 582 J 578 J 1580 < 362 U < 307 USelenium 16 J 21 / 36 6.5 < 1.3 U < 1.3 U 15.8 J < 1.3 USilver 7.26 J 4 / 36 < 2.8 U < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 UJ < 2 USodium 558 23 / 36 178 J 137 J < 130 U 183 J < 128 UThallium 109 36 / 36 49.3 33 6.1 73.7 109Vanadium 110 36 / 36 37.4 34.9 30 103 99.2Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 3 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD ID 0501SB02 0501SB08 0501SB10 0501SD00 0502SB02DATE COLLECTED February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualZinc 870 36 / 36 120 59.2 26.1 117 90.6OTHER PARAMETERS(mg/kg)Cyanide 1.68 9 / 36 < 0.43 U < 0.33 U < 0.32 U < 0.37 U < 0.31 UTotal Organic Carbon 53.8 4 / 4Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramE = Value exceeds linear range. Use diluted sample result ifavailable.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Centerdatabase.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutionsand reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analytewas detected in the samples.The maximum detected concentrations for each analyte areunderlined and appear in boldface font.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the samplewas not analyzed for these parameters.Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 4 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 362-Butanone 62 9 / 36Acetone 300 27 / 36Benzene 2400 26 / 36Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36Chlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36Ethylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36m/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36o-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36Toluene 130 J 15 / 36Xylenes, total 520 6 / 26SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36Acenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36Acenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36Anthracene 510 J 6 / 36Benzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36Butylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36Carbazole 18000 24 / 36Chrysene 1900 13 / 36Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36Di-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36Dibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 360502SB08 0502SB10 0502SD00 0503SB02 0503SB06February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 13 U < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U< 13 U < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U< 13 U 60 J 37 25 < 12 U2300 690 15 J < 13 U 8 J200 J < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U< 13 U < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U100 J < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U< 13 U < 14 U 7 J < 13 U < 12 U< 13 U < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U36 J < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U 3 J520 < 14 U < 17 U < 13 U < 12 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U 11 J< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U 150 J < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U 320 J 180 J < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U 350 J 240 J < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U 100 J < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U3800 J 2100 J 400 J 170 J 7300 J< 13000 U < 450 U 330 J 160 J < 410 U< 13000 U 150 J 2100 99 J < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U 19 J< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U 61 JQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 5 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36Dimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36Fluoranthene 3000 19 / 36Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36Nitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36Phenanthrene 3000 21 / 36Pyrene 2600 21 / 36PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 120502SB08 0502SB10 0502SD00 0503SB02 0503SB06February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U 21 J< 13000 U 120 J 530 J 270 J 82 J< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U 11 J< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U < 410 U58000 47000 40000 1600 120000< 13000 U < 450 U < 1700 U < 420 U 17 J16000 14000 < 1700 U < 420 U 19000< 13000 U 160 J 300 J 140 J 130 J< 13000 U 130 J 760 J 340 J 66 JQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 6 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 361,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 362,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 362,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 362-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 362-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 363-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 364-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36Arsenic 150 36 / 36Barium 371 36 / 36Beryllium 2.38 19 / 36Cadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36Calcium 217000 36 / 36Chromium 771 J 36 / 36Cobalt 67.5 36 / 36Copper 1920 36 / 36Iron 466000 J 36 / 36Lead 744 36 / 36Magnesium 31800 35 / 36Manganese 5490 36 / 36Mercury 3.61 18 / 36Nickel 550 36 / 36Potassium 1670 21 / 36Selenium 16 J 21 / 36Silver 7.26 J 4 / 36Sodium 558 23 / 36Thallium 109 36 / 36Vanadium 110 36 / 360502SB08 0502SB10 0502SD00 0503SB02 0503SB06February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 526 U 2000 < 692 U < 511 U < 503 U< 526 U 1200 < 692 U 560 3100< 526 U 640 < 692 U < 511 U < 503 U< 526 U 1600 < 692 U < 511 U < 503 U< 526 U < 542 U 3000 J < 511 U < 503 U< 526 U < 542 U < 692 U 1600 < 503 U< 526 U < 542 U < 692 U 510 < 503 U< 526 U < 542 U < 692 U < 511 U < 503 U2850 7120 324 388 7618.1 J < 10.8 UJ 16 J 12.6 J 20.9 J64.9 18.4 83.3 118 70.444.7 J 78 19.1 J 13.9 J 11.4 J< 0.53 U < 0.54 U < 0.4 U < 0.51 U < 0.5 U< 1.1 U < 1.1 U < 0.8 U < 1 U < 1 U779 J 5030 1140 880 J 555 J246 J 81.8 J 424 505 J 487 J42.5 17.2 39.7 55.6 47.7425 J 167 J 1360 1420 J 780 J310000 98400 257000 J 331000 34400036.2 23.1 69.9 95.5 54.3363 J 1990 142 J 147 J 144 J3360 1390 2360 2800 3420< 0.11 U < 0.11 U < 0.08 U 0.16 < 0.1 U171 64.2 256 274 219< 315 U 583 J < 240 U < 307 U < 302 U< 1.3 U 2.7 6.9 J < 1.3 U 11.1< 2.1 U < 2.2 U < 1.6 UJ < 2 U < 2 U< 131 U 182 J 127 J < 128 U < 126 U84.4 18 55.2 89.2 65.944.6 29.8 66.8 74.8 66Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 7 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyZinc 870 36 / 36OTHER PARAMETERS(mg/kg)Cyanide 1.68 9 / 36Total Organic Carbon 53.8 4 / 4Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramE = Value exceeds linear range. Use diluted sample result ifavailable.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Centerdatabase.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutionsand reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analytewas detected in the samples.The maximum detected concentrations for each analyte areunderlined and appear in boldface font.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the samplewas not analyzed for these parameters.0502SB08 0502SB10 0502SD00 0503SB02 0503SB06February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual79.4 56.2 75.1 130 71.9< 0.32 U < 0.33 U < 0.25 U < 0.31 U < 0.31 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 8 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 362-Butanone 62 9 / 36Acetone 300 27 / 36Benzene 2400 26 / 36Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36Chlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36Ethylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36m/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36o-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36Toluene 130 J 15 / 36Xylenes, total 520 6 / 26SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36Acenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36Acenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36Anthracene 510 J 6 / 36Benzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36Butylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36Carbazole 18000 24 / 36Chrysene 1900 13 / 36Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36Di-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36Dibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 360503SB10 0503SD00 0504SB02 0504SB04 0504SB10February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 12 U < 16 U < 13 U < 13 U < 13 U14 < 16 U 62 20 3940 140 140 59 1107 J < 16 U 91 240 39< 12 U < 16 U < 13 U < 13 U < 13 U< 12 U < 16 U < 13 U 1 J < 13 U< 12 U < 16 U 24 38 11 J< 12 U < 16 U < 13 U < 13 U < 13 U< 12 U < 16 U < 13 U < 13 U < 13 U< 12 U < 16 U 5 J 20 4 J< 12 U < 16 U 8 J 17 5 J16 J < 1600 U < 860 U 3400 22 J< 410 U < 1600 U 20 J 130 J < 420 U< 410 U < 1600 U 330 J < 2100 U < 420 U30 J < 1600 U 510 J 310 J < 420 U370 J < 1600 U 1900 1200 J 22 J120 J < 1600 U 1300 510 J < 420 U300 J < 1600 U 3100 1000 J < 420 U< 410 U < 1600 U 880 < 2100 U < 420 U76 J < 1600 U 1300 < 2100 U < 420 U< 410 U < 1600 U < 860 U < 2100 U 79 J< 410 U < 1600 U 18 J < 2100 U < 420 U900 560 J 89 J 5100 45 J250 J < 1600 U 1900 940 J 11 J< 410 U 7000 < 860 U < 2100 U < 420 U< 410 U < 1600 U < 860 U < 2100 U < 420 U8 J < 1600 U 14 J 82 J < 420 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 9 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36Dimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36Fluoranthene 3000 19 / 36Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36Nitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36Phenanthrene 3000 21 / 36Pyrene 2600 21 / 36PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 120503SB10 0503SD00 0504SB02 0504SB04 0504SB10February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 410 U < 1600 U < 860 U < 2100 U < 420 U< 410 U < 1600 U < 860 U < 2100 U < 420 U590 < 1600 U 3000 2100 21 J14 J < 1600 U 33 J 210 J < 420 U< 410 U < 1600 U 870 < 2100 U < 420 U40000 25000 190 J 3000000 2300010 J < 1600 U 21 J 590 J 9 J1100 J < 1600 U < 860 U 150 J 170 J270 J < 1600 U 400 J 3000 34 J530 < 1600 U 2600 2400 28 JQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 10 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 361,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 362,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 362,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 362-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 362-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 363-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 364-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36Arsenic 150 36 / 36Barium 371 36 / 36Beryllium 2.38 19 / 36Cadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36Calcium 217000 36 / 36Chromium 771 J 36 / 36Cobalt 67.5 36 / 36Copper 1920 36 / 36Iron 466000 J 36 / 36Lead 744 36 / 36Magnesium 31800 35 / 36Manganese 5490 36 / 36Mercury 3.61 18 / 36Nickel 550 36 / 36Potassium 1670 21 / 36Selenium 16 J 21 / 36Silver 7.26 J 4 / 36Sodium 558 23 / 36Thallium 109 36 / 36Vanadium 110 36 / 360503SB10 0503SD00 0504SB02 0504SB04 0504SB10February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 503 U < 642 U < 523 U 1100 < 511 U830 1600 < 523 U 1000 < 511 U< 503 U < 642 U < 523 U 4900 < 511 U< 503 U < 642 U < 523 U < 511 U < 511 U< 503 U 1500 J 1400 < 511 U < 511 U8500 < 642 U < 523 U < 511 U < 511 U590 < 642 U < 523 U < 511 U < 511 U< 503 U < 642 U < 523 U < 511 U < 511 U466 4470 152 131 6980< 10.1 UJ < 12.8 UJ 15.1 J 15.6 J < 10.2 UJ106 36.3 74.2 73 10.123.7 J 54.3 J 14.5 J 11.1 J 120< 0.5 U < 0.64 U < 0.52 U < 0.51 U 1 J< 1 U < 1.3 U < 1 U < 1 U < 1 U1590 3000 929 J 2090 1270 J569 J 287 630 J 622 J 17.8 J45.7 24.8 49.4 44.5 14.61350 J 634 1790 J 1530 J 26.4 J290000 208000 J 292000 263000 2150089 744 67.7 54.7 23.4177 J 783 J < 131 U 133 J 736 J2820 2430 2540 3590 1430< 0.1 U 0.65 < 0.11 U < 0.11 U < 0.11 U266 180 377 269 22< 302 U 440 J < 314 U < 307 U 390 J14.9 7.4 J 14.3 11 < 1.3 U< 2 U < 2.6 UJ < 2.1 U < 2 U < 2 U< 126 U 202 J < 131 U < 128 U 251 J67.2 35.5 54.3 43.8 4.378.9 44.8 87.1 110 25.1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 11 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyZinc 870 36 / 36OTHER PARAMETERS(mg/kg)Cyanide 1.68 9 / 36Total Organic Carbon 53.8 4 / 4Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramE = Value exceeds linear range. Use diluted sample result ifavailable.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Centerdatabase.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutionsand reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analytewas detected in the samples.The maximum detected concentrations for each analyte areunderlined and appear in boldface font.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the samplewas not analyzed for these parameters.0503SB10 0503SD00 0504SB02 0504SB04 0504SB10February 16, 1996 January 31, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996 February 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual85.2 100 75 59.1 36.2< 0.31 U < 0.4 U < 0.32 U < 0.31 U < 0.32 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 12 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 362-Butanone 62 9 / 36Acetone 300 27 / 36Benzene 2400 26 / 36Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36Chlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36Ethylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36m/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36o-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36Toluene 130 J 15 / 36Xylenes, total 520 6 / 26SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36Acenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36Acenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36Anthracene 510 J 6 / 36Benzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36Butylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36Carbazole 18000 24 / 36Chrysene 1900 13 / 36Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36Di-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36Dibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 360504SD00 0505SB02 0505SB06 0505SB10 0505SD00January 31, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 21 U < 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 16 U< 21 U < 13 U 32 < 14 U < 16 U300 56 190 58 34410 13 J 24 3 J < 16 U4 J < 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 16 U< 21 U < 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 16 U< 21 U 6 J < 13 U < 14 U < 16 U10 J < 13 U < 13 U 4 J 5 J< 21 U < 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 16 U11 J 5 J 1 J < 14 U < 16 U< 21 U 2 J < 13 U < 14 U < 16 U< 2100 U 200 J 21 J 24 J < 1500 U< 2100 U 13 J < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U < 420 U < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U 28 J < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U 430 J 51 J 40 J 350 J< 2100 U 130 J 13 J < 470 U < 1500 U360 J 330 J 55 J 24 J 510 J< 2100 U < 420 U < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U 250 J < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U 210 J 340 J 250 J < 1500 U1200 J 14 J 18 J 720 < 1500 U380 J 720 630 230 J 1600< 2100 U 240 J 27 J 28 J 360 J9000 470 2200 6000 J 4000 J< 2100 U 19 J < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U 12 J < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 13 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36Dimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36Fluoranthene 3000 19 / 36Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36Nitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36Phenanthrene 3000 21 / 36Pyrene 2600 21 / 36PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 120504SD00 0505SB02 0505SB06 0505SB10 0505SD00January 31, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 2100 U < 420 U < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U < 420 U < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U330 J 600 J 85 J 50 J 750 J< 2100 U 27 J < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U< 2100 U < 420 U < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U10000 160000 240000 140000 100000< 2100 U 43 J 15 J 8 J < 1500 U< 2100 U < 420 U < 430 U < 470 U < 1500 U220 J 460 85 J 53 J 490 J570 J 500 67 J 51 J 840 JQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 14 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 361,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 362,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 362,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 362-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 362-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 363-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 364-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36Arsenic 150 36 / 36Barium 371 36 / 36Beryllium 2.38 19 / 36Cadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36Calcium 217000 36 / 36Chromium 771 J 36 / 36Cobalt 67.5 36 / 36Copper 1920 36 / 36Iron 466000 J 36 / 36Lead 744 36 / 36Magnesium 31800 35 / 36Manganese 5490 36 / 36Mercury 3.61 18 / 36Nickel 550 36 / 36Potassium 1670 21 / 36Selenium 16 J 21 / 36Silver 7.26 J 4 / 36Sodium 558 23 / 36Thallium 109 36 / 36Vanadium 110 36 / 360504SD00 0505SB02 0505SB06 0505SB10 0505SD00January 31, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 826 U < 516 U < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U< 826 U 630 < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U< 826 U < 516 U < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U< 826 U < 516 U < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U< 826 UJ < 516 U 1200 1300 < 622 UJ< 826 U < 516 U < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U< 826 U 1400 < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U< 826 U < 516 U < 519 U < 572 U < 622 U2170 1470 6020 14100 383037.5 J 17.7 J < 10.4 U < 11.4 U < 12.4 UJ108 150 28.6 13.5 70.348.8 J 20.3 J 132 178 49.8 J< 0.83 U < 0.52 U 1.6 1.4 J < 0.62 U< 1.7 U < 1 U < 1 U < 1.1 U < 1.2 U9290 1310 J 59400 J 16300 J 18900739 548 J 128 J 48 J 34567.5 59.3 26.3 16.2 38.91920 1610 270 105 736466000 J 363000 128000 54400 257000 J139 114 40.1 26.1 111738 J 263 J 10100 4630 1170 J5490 3310 J 5040 J 3380 J 23000.47 0.26 1.5 < 0.12 U 0.55550 328 136 71.1 184< 496 U < 310 U 611 J 1670 < 373 U16 J < 1.3 U < 1.3 U < 1.4 U 6.8 J< 3.3 UJ < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.5 UJ253 J < 129 U 166 J 145 J 189 J94.3 107 28 8.6 50101 93 31 42.1 54.9Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 15 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyZinc 870 36 / 36OTHER PARAMETERS(mg/kg)Cyanide 1.68 9 / 36Total Organic Carbon 53.8 4 / 4Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramE = Value exceeds linear range. Use diluted sample result ifavailable.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Centerdatabase.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutionsand reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analytewas detected in the samples.The maximum detected concentrations for each analyte areunderlined and appear in boldface font.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the samplewas not analyzed for these parameters.0504SD00 0505SB02 0505SB06 0505SB10 0505SD00January 31, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual137 154 57.4 66.9 143< 0.5 U < 0.32 U < 0.32 U < 0.35 U < 0.38 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 16 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 362-Butanone 62 9 / 36Acetone 300 27 / 36Benzene 2400 26 / 36Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36Chlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36Ethylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36m/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36o-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36Toluene 130 J 15 / 36Xylenes, total 520 6 / 26SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36Acenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36Acenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36Anthracene 510 J 6 / 36Benzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36Butylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36Carbazole 18000 24 / 36Chrysene 1900 13 / 36Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36Di-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36Dibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 360506SB02 0506SB06 0506SB10 0506SD00 0507DS00February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 20 U < 10 U< 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 20 U < 42 U14 J 79 15 67 190 2114 J 2 J < 14 U < 20 U 3.1 10 J< 13 U 2 J < 14 U < 20 U < 10 U< 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 20 U < 10 U< 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 20 U < 10 U< 21 U< 13 U < 13 U 4 J < 20 U < 21 U< 10 U< 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 20 U < 10 U< 13 U < 13 U 8 J < 20 U < 10 U< 13 U < 13 U < 14 U < 20 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U 20 J 15 J 300 J < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U 370 J < 2300 U49 J < 430 U < 450 U 640 J < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U120 J 68 J 92 J < 2000 U < 2300 U17 J 12 J 13 J < 2000 U < 2300 U1100 130 J 53 J < 2000 U < 2300 U58 J < 430 U < 450 U 380 J < 2300 U280 J 1500 1100 6000 < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 17 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36Dimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36Fluoranthene 3000 19 / 36Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36Nitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36Phenanthrene 3000 21 / 36Pyrene 2600 21 / 36PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 120506SB02 0506SB06 0506SB10 0506SD00 0507DS00February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U34 J 16 J < 450 U 570 J < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U16000 11000 9800 2400 6600 2300< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U< 430 U < 430 U < 450 U < 2000 U < 2300 U36 J 16 J 9 J 250 J < 2300 U48 J 16 J 8 J 520 J < 2300 U< 35 U7.5 35 J28 35 J4.8 17 J16 17 J< 35 U< 17 U< 35 U9.4 17 J< 35 U< 35 U6.2 35 J< 35 U14 17 J< 17 U< 17 U< 170 U< 350 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 18 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 361,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 362,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 362,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 362-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 362-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 363-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 364-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36Arsenic 150 36 / 36Barium 371 36 / 36Beryllium 2.38 19 / 36Cadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36Calcium 217000 36 / 36Chromium 771 J 36 / 36Cobalt 67.5 36 / 36Copper 1920 36 / 36Iron 466000 J 36 / 36Lead 744 36 / 36Magnesium 31800 35 / 36Manganese 5490 36 / 36Mercury 3.61 18 / 36Nickel 550 36 / 36Potassium 1670 21 / 36Selenium 16 J 21 / 36Silver 7.26 J 4 / 36Sodium 558 23 / 36Thallium 109 36 / 36Vanadium 110 36 / 360506SB02 0506SB06 0506SB10 0506SD00 0507DS00February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 525 U < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U1400 < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U< 525 U < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U< 525 U < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U2200 J 1600 < 541 U < 800 UJ < 400 U< 525 U < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U< 525 U < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U540 < 530 U < 541 U < 800 U < 400 U5680 10600 6930 5350 7200 34.8< 10.5 U < 10.6 U < 10.8 U < 16 UJ 14.8 17.4 J41.6 16.5 10.2 16.7 23.7 1.7463.7 190 77.2 87.9 125 1.740.54 J 1.1 J 0.78 J < 0.8 U 0.634 1.74 J< 1 U < 1.1 U < 1.1 U < 1.6 U < 0.87 U2770 J 1770 J 77900 J 136000 22900 174212 J 42.3 J 46 J 48.1 44.3 1.7430.1 12.7 J 13.5 J 12.6 J 12.4 3.48658 89.1 117 110 155 3.48168000 47100 48900 76900 J 119000 348187 J 19.3 20.5 82.9 135 1.74813 J 1140 J 31800 6640 5050 1742140 J 1120 J 2960 J 1150 1760 1.740.41 < 0.11 U < 0.11 U 1.2 1.23 0.174169 57.7 60 40.2 56.9 3.48398 J 982 J 1330 J 489 J 483 870 J6 J < 1.3 U < 1.4 U 2.9 J 3.74 1.74< 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.2 U < 3.2 UJ < 1.74 U< 131 U < 132 U 198 J 326 J 103 174 J36.4 9.6 10.6 10.6 4.4 3.4846.1 36.5 26.3 30.1 23.8 1.74Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 19 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyZinc 870 36 / 36OTHER PARAMETERS(mg/kg)Cyanide 1.68 9 / 36Total Organic Carbon 53.8 4 / 4Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramE = Value exceeds linear range. Use diluted sample result ifavailable.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Centerdatabase.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutionsand reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analytewas detected in the samples.The maximum detected concentrations for each analyte areunderlined and appear in boldface font.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the samplewas not analyzed for these parameters.0506SB02 0506SB06 0506SB10 0506SD00 0507DS00February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 February 17, 1996 January 31, 1996 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual86.9 64.6 38.9 271 289 3.48< 0.32 U < 0.33 U < 0.33 U < 0.49 U 0.868 0.87 JQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 20 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 362-Butanone 62 9 / 36Acetone 300 27 / 36Benzene 2400 26 / 36Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36Chlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36Ethylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36m/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36o-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36Toluene 130 J 15 / 36Xylenes, total 520 6 / 26SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36Acenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36Acenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36Anthracene 510 J 6 / 36Benzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36Butylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36Carbazole 18000 24 / 36Chrysene 1900 13 / 36Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36Di-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36Dibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 360507DS04 0507DS06 0507DS08 0507SD00 0508DS00October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 November 29, 2000 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 3.8 U 3.6 5.3 J < 6.3 U < 6.8 U< 15 U < 21 U < 25 U 39 2748 7.5 30 11 < 13 U 220 14< 3.8 U 140 5.3 < 6.3 U 3.3 6.8 J< 3.8 U 2.6 5.3 J < 6.3 U < 6.8 U< 3.8 U < 5.3 U < 6.3 U < 6.8 U< 3.8 U 0.95 5.3 J < 6.3 UJ < 6.8 U< 7.5 U 1.1 11 J < 13 U < 14 U< 7.5 U < 11 U < 13 U < 14 U< 3.8 U < 5.3 U < 6.3 U < 6.8 U< 3.8 U < 5.3 U < 6.3 U < 6.8 U< 3.8 U 2.8 5.3 J < 6.3 U < 6.8 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U18000 3500 < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 21 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36Dimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36Fluoranthene 3000 19 / 36Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36Nitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36Phenanthrene 3000 21 / 36Pyrene 2600 21 / 36PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 120507DS04 0507DS06 0507DS08 0507SD00 0508DS00October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 November 29, 2000 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U300000 35000 11000 2000 3500 4100 J 420 450 J< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U< 3500 U < 2000 U < 4100 U < 450 U3.1 4.2 J < 4.8 U < 5 U < 5.4 U4.3 4.2 J < 4.8 U < 5 U 2.9 5.4 J18 4.2 < 4.8 U < 5 U 11 5.4< 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.5 U < 2.7 U< 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.5 U 2 2.7 J< 4.2 U < 4.8 U < 5 U < 5.4 U< 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.5 U < 2.7 U3 4.2 J < 4.8 U < 5 U 3.5 5.4 J< 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.5 U < 2.7 U1.1 4.2 J < 4.8 U < 5 U < 5.4 U4.7 4.2 J < 4.8 U < 5 U < 5.4 U0.93 4.2 J < 4.8 U < 5 U 2 5.4 J< 4.2 U < 4.8 U < 5 U < 5.4 U7.9 2.1 J < 2.4 U < 2.5 U 2 2.7 J< 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.5 U < 2.7 U2.4 2.1 0.43 2.4 J < 2.5 U < 2.7 U< 21 U < 24 U < 25 U < 27 U< 42 U < 48 U < 50 U 130 54Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 22 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 361,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 362,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 362,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 362-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 362-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 363-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 364-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36Arsenic 150 36 / 36Barium 371 36 / 36Beryllium 2.38 19 / 36Cadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36Calcium 217000 36 / 36Chromium 771 J 36 / 36Cobalt 67.5 36 / 36Copper 1920 36 / 36Iron 466000 J 36 / 36Lead 744 36 / 36Magnesium 31800 35 / 36Manganese 5490 36 / 36Mercury 3.61 18 / 36Nickel 550 36 / 36Potassium 1670 21 / 36Selenium 16 J 21 / 36Silver 7.26 J 4 / 36Sodium 558 23 / 36Thallium 109 36 / 36Vanadium 110 36 / 360507DS04 0507DS06 0507DS08 0507SD00 0508DS00October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 November 29, 2000 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U330 212 9080 24.2 3400 25.1 8640 27.2< 106 U 5.42 12.1 J < 12.5 U 14.5 13.676.8 1.06 25.8 1.21 22.9 1.25 37.7 1.368.78 10.6 J 276 1.21 72.9 1.25 295 1.36< 10.6 U 2.38 1.21 0.482 1.25 J 1.31 1.36 J< 5.29 U < 0.604 U 0.462 0.627 J < 0.679 U861 1060 J 6960 121 60200 125 4040 136420 10.6 34.1 1.21 45.9 1.25 145 1.3633.3 21.2 35 2.42 8.52 2.51 36.7 2.72697 21.2 53.9 2.42 193 2.51 346 2.72443000 212 60000 24.2 10600 251 156000 27245.6 1.06 36.3 1.21 71.3 1.25 67.5 1.3676.2 1060 J 2280 121 4610 125 989 1363130 10.6 3460 1.21 974 1.25 3950 1.360.055 0.106 J < 0.121 U 0.292 0.125 0.183 0.136225 21.2 55.2 2.42 49.2 2.51 134 2.72< 5290 U 663 604 < 627 U 422 679 J< 1.06 U 0.599 1.21 J 0.541 1.25 J 1.36 1.367.26 10.6 J < 1.21 U < 1.25 U < 1.36 U< 1060 U 113 121 J 84.8 125 J 51.4 136 J13.1 2.12 2.34 2.42 J 8.18 2.51 5.83 2.7269.6 10.6 71.4 1.21 24.3 1.25 50.4 1.36Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 23 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyZinc 870 36 / 36OTHER PARAMETERS(mg/kg)Cyanide 1.68 9 / 36Total Organic Carbon 53.8 4 / 4Notes: = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramE = Value exceeds linear range. Use diluted sample result ifavailable.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Centerdatabase.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutionsand reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analytewas detected in the samples.The maximum detected concentrations for each analyte areunderlined and appear in boldface font.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the samplewas not analyzed for these parameters.0507DS04 0507DS06 0507DS08 0507SD00 0508DS00*October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 November 29, 2000 October 24, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual55.1 21.2 70.6 2.42 870 2.51 74.5 2.720.913 0.529 0.166 0.604 J < 0.627 U 0.524 0.679 J29.2 6.23Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 24 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,2-Dichloroethane 24 3 / 362-Butanone 62 9 / 36Acetone 300 27 / 36Benzene 2400 26 / 36Carbon Disulfide 200 J 8 / 36Chlorobenzene 1 J 1 / 36Ethylbenzene 100 J 10 / 36m/p-xylene 31 J 4 / 12Methylene Chloride 31 J 8 / 36o-Xylene 1.3 J 1 / 12Tetrachloroethylene 210 J 2 / 36Toluene 130 J 15 / 36Xylenes, total 520 6 / 26SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Methylnaphthalene 3400 8 / 36Acenaphthene 130 J 3 / 36Acenaphthylene 330 J 1 / 36Anthracene 510 J 6 / 36Benzo(a)anthracene 1900 14 / 36Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 7 / 36Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3100 14 / 36Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 880 1 / 36Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1300 3 / 36Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 J 12 / 36Butylbenzyl phthalate 1200 J 8 / 36Carbazole 18000 24 / 36Chrysene 1900 13 / 36Di-n-butyl phthalate 9000 18 / 36Di-n-octyl phthalate 19 J 2 / 36Dibenzofuran 82 J 5 / 360508DS03 0508DS06 0508DS10 0509DS00 0509DS04October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 25, 2000 October 25, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 5.9 U < 5.1 U < 7.3 U < 4 U< 23 U < 20 U < 29 U < 16 U< 12 U 27 10 < 15 UJ < 9.7 U< 5.9 U < 5.1 U 4.9 7.3 J 12 4 J2.8 5.9 J < 5.1 U < 7.3 U 1.4 4 J< 5.9 U < 5.1 U < 7.3 U < 4 U< 5.9 U < 5.1 U < 7.3 U 2.7 4.9 J< 12 U < 10 U < 15 U 4.3 9.7 J< 12 U < 10 U < 15 U < 8 U< 5.9 U < 5.1 U < 7.3 U 1.3 4.9 J< 5.9 U < 5.1 U 18 7.9 J < 4 U< 5.9 U < 5.1 U < 7.3 U 8.5 4.9 J< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 25 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 2700 J 3 / 36Dimethyl phthalate 21 J 1 / 36Fluoranthene 3000 19 / 36Fluorene 210 J 5 / 36Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 870 1 / 36N-nitrosodiphenylamine 3000000 34 / 36Naphthalene 590 J 8 / 36Nitrobenzene 19000 9 / 36Phenanthrene 3000 21 / 36Pyrene 2600 21 / 36PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 3.1 J 1 / 124,4-DDE 12 6 / 124,4-DDT 40 7 / 12Alpha-Benzenehexachloride 4.8 J 3 / 12Alpha-Chlordane 16 J 4 / 12beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 5.9 J 3 / 12delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 1.5 J 1 / 12Dieldrin 9.3 5 / 12Endosulfan I 9.4 J 2 / 12Endosulfan II 1.4 J 4 / 12Endosulfan sulfate 8.4 J 5 / 12Endrin aldehyde 9.2 6 / 12Endrin ketone 4.5 J 1 / 12gamma-Chlordane 18 J 6 / 12Heptachlor 4.4 J 1 / 12Lindane 4.9 5 / 12Methoxychlor 17 J 3 / 12POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 320 3 / 120508DS03 0508DS06 0508DS10 0509DS00 0509DS04October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 25, 2000 October 25, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual580 420 < 400 U 2700 1100 J < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U 450 400 > 26000 E 54000 7600< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 420 U < 400 U < 1100 U < 760 U< 5.1 U < 4.9 U < 6.7 U < 4.6 U< 5.1 U < 4.9 U 8.2 6.7 8.9 4.6 J< 5.1 U < 4.9 U 8 6.7 29 4.6< 2.5 UJ < 2.5 U 2.3 3.3 J < 2.3 U< 2.5 U < 2.5 U 3.3 3.3 1.8 2.3 J< 5.1 U 2.1 4.9 J 5.9 6.7 J 2.7 4.6 J< 2.5 U 1.5 2.5 J < 3.3 U < 2.3 U< 5.1 U < 4.9 U 8.1 6.7 5.5 4.6< 2.5 U < 2.5 U < 3.3 U 3.3 2.3 J< 5.1 U < 4.9 U < 6.7 U 1.4 4.6 J< 5.1 U < 4.9 U 4.2 6.7 J 6.3 4.6 J< 5.1 U < 4.9 U 3.9 6.7 J 3.6 4.6 J< 5.1 U < 4.9 U < 6.7 U < 4.6 U< 2.5 U < 2.5 U 7.3 3.3 J 1.4 2.3 J< 2.5 U < 2.5 U < 3.3 U < 2.3 U0.63 2.5 J < 2.5 U 4.9 3.3 < 2.3 U< 25 U < 25 U 11 33 J 12 23 J< 51 U < 49 U < 67 U 280 46Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 5\Predraft\Sections 1-10\Section 1-6 Tables_Rev2 Page 26 of 32 4/25/02TABLE 5-2SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTEDSITE 5 - ANILINE PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 2000 2 / 361,3-Dinitrobenzene 3100 8 / 362,4-Dinitrotoluene 4900 2 / 362,6-Dinitrotoluene 1600 1 / 362-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 3600 J 10 / 362-Nitrotoluene 8500 3 / 363-Nitrotoluene 1400 3 / 364-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 540 1 / 36METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 14100 36 / 36Antimony 37.5 J 14 / 36Arsenic 150 36 / 36Barium 371 36 / 36Beryllium 2.38 19 / 36Cadmium 0.462 J 1 / 36Calcium 217000 36 / 36Chromium 771 J 36 / 36Cobalt 67.5 36 / 36Copper 1920 36 / 36Iron 466000 J 36 / 36Lead 744 36 / 36Magnesium 31800 35 / 36Manganese 5490 36 / 36Mercury 3.61 18 / 36Nickel 550 36 / 36Potassium 1670 21 / 36Selenium 16 J 21 / 36Silver 7.26 J 4 / 36Sodium 558 23 / 36Thallium 109 36 / 36Vanadium 110 36 / 360508DS03 0508DS06 0508DS10 0509DS00 0509DS04October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 25, 2000 October 25, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U 480 400 < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U 1100 400 J < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U12000 25.3 8370 24.5 5720 33.4 878 23.2< 12.6 U < 12.3 U 17.5 16.7 < 11.6 U12.9 1.26 21.5 1.23 44.3 1.67 16.1 1.16138 1.26 371 1.23 88 1.67 21.4 1.161.08 1.26 J 1.78 1.23 0.616 1.67 J 0.263 1.16 J< 0.631 U < 0.613 U < 0.836 U < 0.579 U2820 126 63100 123 6610 167 217000 116018.7 1.26 18.9 1.23 268 1.67 66.1 1.1619.3 2.53 27.6 2.45 23.7 3.34 10.2 2.3240.4 2.53 31.1 2.45 549 3.34 191 2.3229400 25.3 39500 24.5 250000 334 63200 23.222.8 1.26 27.4 1.23 250 1.67 15.4 1.161230 126 27900 123 1130 167 29200 1163240 1.26 4390 1.23 2640 1.67 1550 1.160.0256 0.126 J < 0.123 U
Origin:	2002-09-25
Source:	http://indianamemory.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15078coll17/id/33765
Collection:	Clark County Collections
Rights:	http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/
Copyright:	Charlestown-Clark County Public Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes and makes no warranty with regard to their use for other purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and/or holders of other rights such as publicity and/or privacy rights is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. There may be content that is protected as works for hire copyright held by the party that commissioned the original work and/or under the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item.
Geography:	Charlestown, Clark County, Indiana 38.4357546,-85.6577676
Subjects:	Maps Indiana Ordnance Works (U.S.) Hoosier Ordnance Plant Indiana Arsenal Indiana Army Ammunition Plant Explosives Industry--Indiana Gunpowder, Smokeless Ordnance manufacture Black powder manufacture Facility One ICI Americas Inc Clark County (Ind.) Charlestown (Ind.) United States. Army Ordnance and Ordnance Stores INAAP

Further information on this record can be found at its source.