INAAP old landfill site 1 phase II RCRA facility investigation report Jul 2004
| Description: |
The final report for the old landfill site 1 at Indiana Army Ammunition Plant of Phase II RCRA facility investigation prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in July 2004.The United States federal government began acquiring land in Charlestown, Indiana in 1940 to build a smokeless powder ordnance plant to supply the US military during World War II. Indiana Ordnance Works (IOW) Plant 1 and Hoosier Ordnance Plant (HOP) began production in 1941. In 1944, IOW Plant 2 construction began. On 30 Nov 1945 at the end of WWII, the three plants were combined and renamed Indiana Arsenal. Between 1 Nov 1961 and 1 Aug 1963, the plant was designated Indiana Ordnance Plant. After this time, it became Indiana Army Ammunition Plant (INAAP). Production of ordnance continued at the plant until 1992. After that time, the land and facilities were leased to private industry. A large portion of the land became Charlestown State Park. In October 2016, all the land and facilities were officially sold by the government. This item is part of a larger collection of items from INAAP that are kept at Charlestown Library. F I N A L R E P O R TOLD LANDFILL – SITE 1INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTPHASE II RCRA FACILITY INVESTIGATIONPrepared forU.S. Army Corps of EngineersLouisville DistrictJuly 2004Prepared by12120 Shamrock Plaza, Suite 300Omaha, Nebraska 68154TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA iExecutive Summary ...............................................................................................................................ES-1Section 1 Site Location and Description ...........................................................................................1-11.1 Operational History and Waste Characteristics ......................................1-11.2 Previous Investigations..........................................................................1-21.3 Report Organization ..............................................................................1-2Section 2 Field Activities Summary ...................................................................................................2-12.1 Geophysical Survey...............................................................................2-12.2 On-Site Screening Level Data Collection ..............................................2-12.3 Soil and Sediment Sampling..................................................................2-12.3.1 Trench Soil Sampling ................................................................2-12.3.2 Soil Boring Sampling.................................................................2-22.3.3 Sediment Sampling....................................................................2-22.4 Surface Water Sampling........................................................................2-22.5 Groundwater Sampling..........................................................................2-32.6 Field Screening Results .........................................................................2-32.7 IDW Disposition ...................................................................................2-3Section 3 Physical Investigation Results ..........................................................................................3-13.1 Topography and Surface Features..........................................................3-13.2 Local Surficial Geology ........................................................................3-13.2.1 Geophysical Survey Results.......................................................3-13.2.2 Soil Borings, Trenches and Geotechnical Results.......................3-23.3 Shallow Hydrogeology..........................................................................3-4Section 4 Data Quality Review and Validation..................................................................................4-14.1 Phase I RI..............................................................................................4-14.2 Phase II RFI ..........................................................................................4-1Section 5 Chemical Investigation Results.........................................................................................5-1Section 6 Contamination Assessment...............................................................................................6-16.1 Near Surface Soils and Sediments .........................................................6-16.1.1 VOCs ........................................................................................6-16.1.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................6-1TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA ii6.1.3 Pesticides...................................................................................6-26.1.4 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines.........................................................6-26.1.5 TPH – Diesel Fraction ...............................................................6-26.1.6 Metals........................................................................................6-26.2 Subsurface Soils ....................................................................................6-36.2.1 VOCs ........................................................................................6-36.2.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................6-36.2.3 Pesticides...................................................................................6-46.2.4 TPH – Diesel Fraction ...............................................................6-46.2.5 Metals........................................................................................6-46.3 Surface Water........................................................................................6-46.3.1 VOCs ........................................................................................6-56.3.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................6-56.3.3 Pesticides...................................................................................6-56.3.4 Metals and Nitrate .....................................................................6-56.4 Groundwater .........................................................................................6-66.4.1 VOCs ........................................................................................6-66.4.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................6-66.4.3 Pesticides...................................................................................6-76.4.4 Metals........................................................................................6-76.5 Overall Assessment ...............................................................................6-7Section 7 Human Health Risk Evaluation..........................................................................................7-17.1 Introduction...........................................................................................7-17.1.1 Purpose......................................................................................7-17.2 Risk Screen Process ..............................................................................7-1Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs)....................7-17.3 Results ..................................................................................................7-2Section 8 Summary and Recommendations.....................................................................................8-18.1 Summary...............................................................................................8-18.1.1 Physical Characteristics .............................................................8-18.1.2 Contamination Assessment ........................................................8-1TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA iii8.1.2.1 Near Surface Soil and Sediment ..................................8-18.1.2.2 Subsurface Soil Samples .............................................8-28.1.2.3 Surface Water/Leachate Samples.................................8-28.1.2.4 Groundwater Samples .................................................8-28.1.2.5 Overall Assessment .....................................................8-28.1.3 Human Health Risk Screen/Assessment .....................................8-38.1.3.1 Soil/Sediment ..............................................................8-38.1.3.2 Surface Water/Groundwater ........................................8-38.2 Recommendations .................................................................................8-3Section 9 References...........................................................................................................................9-1TABLE OF CONTENTSList of TablesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA ivTable 2-1 Summary of Phase I RI Samples for Chemical AnalysisTable 2-2 Summary of Phase II RFI Samples for Chemical AnalysisTable 2-3 Summary of Field Screening For Organic Vapors in Soil SamplesTable 3-1 Summary of Trenching and Test Pit DescriptionsTable 3-2 Boring and Trench Locations Where Groundwater Was EncounteredTable 5-1 Summary of Chemicals Detected in Soil and Sediment SamplesTable 5-2 Summary of Chemicals Detected in Surface Water and GroundwaterSamplesTable 7-1 Comparison of Total Soil Concentrations to Screening LevelsTable 7-2 Comparison of Surface Soil/Sediment Concentrations to Screening LevelsTable 7-3 Comparison of Surface Water/Groundwater Concentrations to ScreeningLevelsTable 7-4 Reasonable Maximum Exposure Determination for Chemicals of PotentialConcern (COPC)TABLE OF CONTENTSList of FiguresQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA vFigure 1-1 Site Location MapFigure 1-2 Surface Features MapFigure 2-1 Sample Location MapFigure 2-2 EM Survey AreaFigure 3-1 Horizontal Dipole Quadrature Response Contour MapFigure 3-2 Horizontal Dipole Inphase Response Contour MapFigure 3-3 Vertical Dipole Quadrature Response Contour MapFigure 3-4 Vertical Dipole Inphase Response Contour MapFigure 3-5 Extent of Refuse and Geologic Cross-SectionFigure 3-6 Geologic Cross-Section A-A’Figure 3-7 Geologic Cross-Section B-B’Figure 3-8 Geologic Cross-Section C-C’Figure 3-9 Geologic Cross-Section D-D’Figure 3-10 Geologic Cross-Section E-E’Figure 3-11 Geologic Cross-Section F-F’Figure 6-1 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in Soil and Sediment – OldLandfill (North)Figure 6-2 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in Soil and Sediment – OldLandfill (South)Figure 6-3 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in Surface Water andGroundwaterFigure 8-1 Human Health COPCs Detected in Soil, Sediment, andGroundwaterTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AppendicesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA viAppendix A Data Quality Review and ValidationAppendix B Human Health Risk Statistics and CalculationsAppendix C Boring and Trench LogsAppendix D Sample Collection Field SheetsAppendix E Summary of Analytical DataNote: Information contained in the Appendices is included in CD-ROM format. The CD-ROMmay be found at the back of this binder.TABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA viiAE Assessment EndpointAEC U.S. Army Environmental CenterAET Apparent Effect LevelsAQUIRE Aquatic Information Retrieval SystemASTER Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of RiskATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registrybgs Below Ground SurfaceBA BioavailabilityBCFs Bioconcentration FactorsBRAC Base Re-Alignment and ClosureBW Body WeightCERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and LiabilityActCDI Chronic Daily IntakeCLP Contract Laboratory ProgramCMS Corrective Measures StudyCOC Chemicals of ConcernCOI Chemical of InterestCOPC Chemicals of Potential ConcernCOPEC Chemicals of Potential Ecological ConcernCRDL Contract Required Detection LimitCRQL Contract Required Quantitation LimitsCSP Charlestown State ParkCTE Central Tendency ExposureCTV Critical Toxicity ValueD&M Dames and MooreDAF Dilution Attenuation FactorDDT 4,4-DichlorodiphenyltrichloroethaneDERP Defense Environmental Restoration Program2,4-DNT 2,4-dinitrotolueneDOD Department of DefenseDQO Data Quality ObjectivesTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA viiiDS Direct Push SoilDW Direct Push WaterEM ElectromagneticEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyEPC Exposure Point ConcentrationEQP Equilibrium-PartitioningERA Ecological Risk AssessmentFSP Field Sampling Plangpm gallons per minuteHDPE High-Density PolyethyleneHEAST Health Effects Assessment Summary TablesHHRA Human Health Risk AssessmentHI Hazard IndexHLSC Human Life Cycle Safe ConcentrationHQ Hazard QuotientHSA hollow-stem augerICI ICI Americas, Inc.ID inner diameterIDEM Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementIDL Instrument Detection LimitIDNR Indiana Department Natural ResourcesIDW investigation-derived wastesINAAP Indiana Army Ammunition PlantIRIS Integrated Risk Information SystemIWQC Indiana Water Quality CriteriaJ/UJ Qualified Estimatedkg KilogramL/day Liter per dayLC Leachate SampleLD50 Lethal dose 50LDlo Lowest Lethal DoseMATC Maximum Acceptable Toxicant ConcentrationTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA ixMCL Maximum Contaminant LevelME Measurement Endpointmg/day milligrams per daymg/kg milligram per kilogrammg/m3 milligram per cubic metermL milliliterMS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike DuplicateMSL Mean Sea LevelMW Monitoring WellNCEA National Center for Environmental AssessmentNOAEL No Observable Adverse Effects LevelNOD Notice of DeficiencyNPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemOD outside diameterP&E Propellants and ExplosivesPA Preliminary AssessmentPAH Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonPCB Polychlorinated BiphenylPEL Probable – Effects – LevelPPE Personal Protective Equipmentppm parts per millionPRG Preliminary Remediation GoalsPVC Polyvinyl ChlorideQA Quality AssuranceQAPP Quality Assurance Project PlanQC Quality Control“R” RejectedRBC Risk-Based ConcentrationRCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery ActRDA Recommended Daily AllowanceRDX TrimethylenetrinitramineRfD Reference DoseTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA xRFD-I Reference Inhalation DoseRFI RCRA Facility InvestigationRI Remedial InvestigationRISC Risk Integrated System of ClosureRME Recommended Maximum ExposureSAP Sampling and Analysis PlanSARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization ActSB Soil BoringSCEM Site Conceptual Exposure ModelSCFS Sample Collection Field SheetsSD SedimentSOP Standard Operating ProcedureSP SpringSS Shallow SoilSVOC Semivolatile Organic CompoundSW Surface WaterSWQC Surface Water Quality CriteriaTAL Target Analyte ListTCL Target Compound ListTCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureTDS Total Dissolved SolidsTEL Threshold – Effects – LevelTPH Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsTRV Toxicity Reference ValueTSS Total Suspended Solids“U” Qualified Nondetectμg/kg microgram per kilogramμg/L microgram per Literμg/m3 microgram per cubic meterUCL Upper Confidence LimitURSGWC URS Greiner Woodward ClydeUSACE U.S. Army Corps of EngineersTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AcronymsQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA xiUSATHAMA U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials AgencyUSCS Unified Soil Classification SystemUSDA U.S. Department of AgricultureUSEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSGS U.S. Geologic SurveyUTL Upper Tolerance LimitVOC Volatile Organic CompoundW-C Woodward-ClydeExecutive Summary Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA ES-1The following includes the results of the Phase II RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) completedat the Old Landfill (Site 1) at the Indiana Army Ammunition Plant (INAAP). The report alsosummarizes the results of the previously completed Phase I Remedial Investigation (RI).INAAP currently encompasses approximately 9,790 acres in south-central Clark County,Indiana. Its southern boundary is approximately 6 miles north of Jeffersonville, Indiana and 10miles from the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan area, which lies to the south across the OhioRiver. INAAP is an inactive military industrial installation. The Army intends to transfer theproperty to the Local Reuse Authority for commercial development or to the State of Indiana forinclusion in the state park system. The Old Landfill is one of 90 sites identified at INAAP.The Plant was originally constructed as three separate facilities: The Indiana Ordnance WorksPlant 1, the Hoosier Ordnance Plant, and the Indiana Works Plant 2. The three facilities wereconsolidated into the Indiana Arsenal in 1945. The Indiana Arsenal was redesignated as theIndiana Ordnance Plant in 1961; in August 1963, it was redesignated again as the Indiana ArmyAmmunition Plant.Topography at the INAAP can be described as a middle-aged karst topography. Karsttopography is produced by the dissolution of limestone, gypsum, or other readily soluble rocks,commonly along joints, fractures, bedding planes, or other such features. The dissolutionprocess results in the formation of sinkholes, caves, and underground drainage. Numeroussinkholes and springs are found throughout much of INAAP.Approximately 96 percent of INAAP’s land surface drains directly into the Ohio River via sevendrainage basins. The remaining 4 percent reaching the Ohio River indirectly through thePheasant Run basin.Groundwater at INAAP is present in the bedrock formations of the upland areas and in theterrace/floodplain sand and gravel deposits located within the Ohio River valley. Thegroundwater present in the floodplain aquifer along the Ohio River is a major water supplysource. Groundwater is not usually found in the thin soil layer covering the bedrock surface inthe upland areas. When present, shallow groundwater typically mingles with surface water byflowing in and out of karst features.The Phase I and II investigations at the Old Landfill (Site 1) included the completion of anelectromagnetic (EM) survey, on-site field level data collection, 19 test pits, 20 trenches, 44 soilborings, and the collection and analysis of 46 near surface soil samples, 97 subsurface soilsamples, 10 sediment samples, six surface water samples, three leachate samples and threegroundwater samples. Chemical analyses included Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Semi-volatileOrganic Compounds (SVOCs), pesticides, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs),herbicides, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), nitroaromatics/nitramines, metals, cyanide andnitrate/nitrite analysis.The Old Landfill (Site 1) is located in the northwest portion of the INAAP facility, at thesouthern edge of the Charlestown State Park. The Old Landfill covers approximately 20 acresand is separated into two distinct areas (north and south) by Landfill Road. Based on interviews,aerial photographs, records review, and site reconnaissance, the Old Landfill received mixedExecutive Summary Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA ES-2wastes including general refuse, construction debris, nitrocellulose-contaminated waste (i.e.,items that have been in contact with nitrocellulose), and possibly oil-contaminated soil from acleanup of a 1972 transformer explosion (USATHAMA 1980). During site reconnaissance andfield activities of the Phase I RI and Phase II RFI, construction debris and general refuse wasobserved on the ground along the east central to northeast portion of the north landfill area. Thelandfill slopes generally to the north-northwest with a relief of about 30 feet and currentconditions are soil covered and overgrown with grass, weeds, small shrubs, and a mix ofconiferous and deciduous trees.The local surficial geology of the Old Landfill, based on the Phase I RI (W-C 1998) report, and19 test pits, 20 trenches, and 22 direct-push soil borings completed for the Phase II RFI fieldinvestigation, indicated bedrock at the burial area is overlain by about 4 to 14 feet of fill soil,construction debris and general refuse, and residual soil. Construction debris and general refusewere observed in the borings and trenches from approximately one foot to ten feet below groundsurface (bgs). The buried debris ranged from construction debris (i.e. gravel, concrete, brick, andwood ties) to general refuse (i.e. clothing, aluminum cans, plastic bags, and newspaper) and wasunderlain by silty clay fill, residual soils or limestone bedrock. Soil cover over the debris wastypically a few feet or less and underlying fill soil thickness varied from a few feet toapproximately 14 feet thick. Groundwater was encountered in limited quantities in selectborings and trenches and ranged in depth from 5.0 to 11.9 feet bgs.A contamination assessment was completed for near surface soil and sediment, subsurface soil,surface water and groundwater media. Low levels of VOCs, SVOCs and pesticides weredetected throughout the site, primarily at surface and intermediate depths and with the highestconcentrations generally in the vicinity of the exposed debris areas. Elevated levels of fourSVOCs and one nitroaromatic compound occurred in the surface to intermediate depths in thevicinity of the exposed debris areas and in the southeast portion of the north landfill. TPH wasdetected at three locations in the southern portion of the north landfill and several metals resultsexceeded background concentrations for all media sampled at the site.A human health risk screen was performed on all contaminants found in surface soils/sediments,total soils/sediments, and in the surface water and groundwater media at the Old Landfill. Fourchemicals of potential concern (COPCs) were identified for total soil/sediment, two COPCs wereidentified for surface soil/sediment, and no COPCs were identified for surface water andgroundwater media. A risk assessment was provided for the COPCs by evaluating theReasonable Maximum Exposure (RME) scenario. Three of the four COPCs evaluated had RMEvalues below risk screening values. The fourth COPC had a low frequency of detection (0.65%)and the concentration was estimated below the reporting limit.Based on the results of the Phase I RI and Phase II RFI field activities, sufficient data has beencollected to characterize the Old Landfill. Physical and chemical investigation results were usedto evaluate potential human health risks at the site. Based on investigative results and the humanhealth risk screen, no further action is recommended outside of a surface debris removal to clearpotential physical hazards from the site.Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 1-1The Old Landfill (Site 1) is located in the northwest portion of the INAAP facility, at thesouthern edge of the Charlestown State Park (see Figure 1-1). The Old Landfill is separated intotwo distinct areas (north and south) by Landfill Road, and is bordered by:· North - woodlands, JerseyAvenue and the southernboundary of CharlestownState Park· East – woodlands, and openfield with grass and trees,Jersey Avenue andCharlestown State Park· South - Charlestown LandingRoad, an open field with grassand trees and the northernboundary fence of the INAAPfacility· West - North Ash Settling Basin (Site 3) and an open field with grass and treesThe Old Landfill occupies about 20 acres and received a variety of waste materials that includedgeneral refuse, building rubble, and nitrocellulose contaminated debris (see Figure 1-2). Accessto the site is either through Charlestown State Park to the north (along Jersey Avenue to LandfillRoad, which bisects the landfill) or through the INAAP facility to the south (from the P&E Area(Site 63) through the INAAP facility fence to Landfill Road). The landfill is unlined, soilcovered and is currently overgrown with grass, weeds, small shrubs, and a mix of coniferous anddeciduous trees.1.1 OPERATIONAL HISTORY AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICSBased on interviews, aerial photographs, records review, and site reconnaissance, the followingoperational history for the Old Landfill was determined:· Prior to its use as a landfill in 1969, this area was used as a burning ground forgarbage and other sanitary fill materials (USATHAMA 1980).· The landfill was active from 1969 until 1974, during construction of the BlackPowder Plant, and received construction debris from the Nitroglycerine Paste Facility.· The landfill received waste consisting of general refuse, building rubble,nitrocellulose-contaminated waste (i.e., items that have been in contact withnitrocellulose), and possibly PCBs.· Oil-contaminated soil from cleanup of a 1972 transformer explosion was alsodisposed of at the landfill (USATHAMA 1980).Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 1-2· Several disturbed areas were observed in the southern landfill section and onedisturbed area was observed in the northern landfill section in aerial photographsfrom 1949 and 1960. The disturbed areas in the south landfill are scatteredthroughout the area and appear to be buildings. The disturbed area in the northlandfill is located in the northern half of this area and appears to be a soil disturbance(i.e., possible excavation area).· One disturbed area was observed in each landfill in aerial photographs from 1975.The disturbed area in the south landfill covered the entire landfill. Disturbed areasthat appear to be buildings in 1949 and 1960 aerial photographs could no longer bedistinguished. The disturbed area in the north landfill covered the entire landfill andextends beyond the interpreted landfill boundary to Jersey Avenue. These disturbedareas are likely related to past landfill activities.· During site reconnaissance, exposed debris consisting of construction debris, roofingmaterials, and powder-can lids was observed on the surface of the landfill.· During the field activities of the Phase I RI and Phase II RFI, exposed landfill debris(i.e., concrete, roofing materials, tires, etc.) was observed north of the north fence linewithin the Charlestown State Park, which was formerly a part of the INAAP facility.1.2 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONSDames & Moore completed a Contamination Survey at the Old Landfill in 1984 (D&M 1984).However, the analytical methods used are now obsolete, rendering the analytical data collectedduring this survey incomparable to the data collected, following current standards, during thePhase I RI and the Phase II RFI. Therefore, this data was not used.Woodward-Clyde (W-C) completed a Phase I RI at this site in 1996 (W-C 1998).For additional information regarding the previous investigations completed at INAAP, refer toSection 3 of the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a).1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATIONThis report compiles the Phase I RI report (W-C 1998) with the results of the Phase II RFI (URS2002). The remaining portion of this report is organized as follows:· Section 2 – Field Activities Summary· Section 3 – Physical Investigation Results: reviews site topography, local surficialgeology, and shallow hydrogeology· Section 4 – Data Quality Review and Validation: summarizes the results of the 100percent quality control (QC) review and the ten percent full validationSite Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 1-3· Section 5 – Chemical Investigation Results: identifies the chemical analyses and fieldduplicate samples collected; summarizes the sample detections by sampleidentification number and matrix type in tabular form· Section 6 – Contamination Assessment: presents an evaluation, both in text and onfigures, of chemicals present at the site in elevated concentrations by matrix andchemical group· Section 7 – Human Health Risk Evaluation: examines the chemicals present invarious matrices at the site to determine if they pose a threat to human health· Section 8 – Summary and Recommendations· Section 9 – ReferencesFor additional information regarding the rational for and the objectives of the Phase II RFI, referto the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a) and the Field Sampling Plan (URS 2002).Field Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 2-1Field activities for the Old Landfill included trenching, a geophysical survey, and surface andsubsurface soil, sediment, surface water, groundwater, soil-gas and leachate sampling. Thelocations of the sampling points are provided on Figure 2-1. Sample location, identification,depth, matrix, and chemical analyses are presented in Table 2-1 for samples collected in 1996,and in Table 2-2 for samples collected in 2002. All field activities were completed in accordancewith applicable Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) (W-C 1998, URSGWC 2000b, URS2002). Any deviations from the SOPs are noted on the Sample Collection Field Sheets (SCFS),provided in Appendix D.2.1 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYAn EM survey was completed at the Old Landfill as part of the Phase I RI field activities. Thepurpose of the EM survey was to locate buried materials. A geophysical survey grid system wasestablished prior to the EM survey using electronic total station survey instruments. EMgeophysical surveying of the approximately 20-acre site was done using a uniform datastationing of 20 feet. The location and area of the survey is shown in Figure 2-2. Results of theEM survey are reported in Section 3.2.2 ON-SITE SCREENING LEVEL DATA COLLECTIONDuring the Phase I RI field activities, following the evaluation of the EM geophysical surveydata, soil gas, direct-push soil and groundwater sampling activities were initiated for on-sitescreening. The objective of the screening-level data collection surveys was to help identifysample locations for chemical analysis. In general, sample points were placed on a grid systemwith sample points spaced about 100 feet apart. Seventy-four samples were collected consistingof 33 soil gas, 19 direct-push groundwater, and 22 direct-push soil samples. The results of thesoil gas and direct-push soil and groundwater sampling and on-site analyses are presented in thePhase I RI Report (W-C 1998).2.3 SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING2.3.1 Trench Soil SamplingAs part of the Phase II RFI field activities, twenty 10-foot trenches and nineteen test pits wereexcavated to evaluate the lateral and vertical extent of refuse, depth to bedrock, soil types, andthickness of the existing soil cover. Soil sampling was completed at each trench location (onesample per trench location), while test pits were evaluated for soil type and depth of refuse only.Sample identifications, depths, matrices, chemical analyses, and location descriptions arepresented in Table 2-2.Trenches and test pits were excavated using a Case Model 580L backhoe operated by Clark-Nickles Co., under the supervision of URS personnel. URS personnel logged the trenches andtest pits to indicate the depth and thickness of buried materials, to identify soil types, and tocollect investigative soil samples for chemical analysis. Generally trenches were excavated to aField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 2-2maximum depth of 10 feet bgs or bedrock, whichever was first encountered. Trench 01TR10was abandoned at 6 feet bgs due to tree roots and water infiltration which caused the trench wallsto collapse. Test pits were completed to depths between 2 feet and 8 feet bgs for depth of buriedmaterials and to identify soil types only. Upon completion, each trench and test pit wasbackfilled with the excavated soils. Results of the trenching and test pit activities are reported inSection 3, and trench and test pit logs are included in Appendix C.2.3.2 Soil Boring SamplingForty-four soil borings were advanced in areas of suspected contamination based on geophysicalsurvey data (see Section 2.1), on-site screening-level data collection (see Section 2.2), historicalinformation, and topography. During the Phase I RI, twenty-two soil borings (01SB01 through01SB22) were drilled using hollow stem augers (4 ¼-inch inner diameter, 8-inch outer diameter)and a 3-inch diameter stainless steel split spoon. The maximum depths ranged fromapproximately 4 to 12 feet bgs. For the Phase II RFI, twenty-two borings (01DS23 through01DS44) were completed using a track-rig mounted direct push system and 1.75-inch diameterpolyvinyl chloride (PVC) liners. The maximum depths ranged from approximately 4 to 14 feetbgs.Typically, three samples were retained for chemical analysis from each soil boring location.However, due to their relatively shallow total depths, only two samples were collected fromborings 01SB02, 01SB08, 01SB14, 01SB16, 01DS31, 01DS32, 01DS34, 01DS35 and 01DS38.Sample identifications, depths, matrices, chemical analyses, and location descriptions arepresented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. Soil boring locations are shown on Figure 2-1.2.3.3 Sediment SamplingTen sediment samples were collected from surface drainage features along Landfill Road andwithin the northern third of the landfill area as a part of the Phase I RI and Phase II RFI fieldactivities. Surface water samples were collocated with the sediment samples collected during thePhase I RI (see Section 2.3). Surface water was not present in the drainages at the time ofsediment sample collection during the Phase II RFI. One sample was retained for chemicalanalysis from each sediment sampling location.Sediment samples 01SD01 through 01SD05 were collected from the 0- to 2-foot depth intervaland samples 01SD06 through 01SD10 were collected from the 0- to 1-foot depth interval using ahand trowel. Sample identifications, depths, matrices, chemical analyses, and locationdescriptions for the drainage sediments are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. Sampling locationsare shown on Figure 2-1.2.4 SURFACE WATER SAMPLINGSix surface water samples and three leachate samples were collected as a part of the Phase I RIfield activities. Each surface water sample was collocated with sediment samples collectedduring the Phase I RI (see Section 2.2.3). The three leachate samples were collected from seepsField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 2-3observed during the Phase I RI field activities. Sample identifications, matrices, chemicalanalyses, and location descriptions for the surface water and leachate samples are presented inTable 2-1. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 2-1.2.5 GROUNDWATER SAMPLINGGroundwater was encountered in limited quantities in select direct push borings advanced duringthe Phase II RFI field activities. While five direct push borings exhibited some degree ofgroundwater infiltration, only three borings produced enough groundwater for sample collection.These groundwater samples were collected using direct push, pre-packed screen, temporary wellpoints installed in direct push soil borings where sufficient groundwater was encountered. Thesepre-packed temporary well points included a silica sand pack to at least 1 foot above the screenedinterval and a bentonite seal to the surface. Prior to the collection of samples, at least one liter ofwater was purged from each temporary well point using a peristaltic pump and dedicated highdensity polyethylene (HDPE) tubing. Samples for VOC analysis were collected using adisposable minibailer while samples for other analyses were collected using a peristaltic pumpand HDPE tubing. Sample identification, depth, matrix, chemical analyses and locationdescriptions are presented in Table 2-2. Boring locations are shown in Figure 2-1.2.6 FIELD SCREENING RESULTSField screening was completed during the Phase I RI and Phase II RFI field investigations usingheadspace analysis as described in SOP No. 15 of the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a).Recovered soil from each boring and sediment sample was field screened using aphotoionization detector (PID) to verify the presence or absence of organic vapors. Headspaceresults are presented in Table 2-3 and were recorded on the boring logs (see Appendix C) and theSample Collection Field Sheets (SCFSs) (see Appendix D). A brief discussion of the oneelevated level PID detection (01DS27) is presented in Section 6.5.2.7 IDW DISPOSITIONInvestigation-derived wastes (IDW) including soil cuttings, development and purge water,decontamination fluids, and personal protective equipment (PPE) were disposed in accordancewith the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a) and the Field Sampling Plan (URS 2002).TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Pest/PCBs3Metals4Nitrate / Nitrite5TPH6Herbicides7 Sample Location Description Comments01SB01 0101SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 400 southeast of Landfill Road adjacent0101SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X to gravel access road0101SB09 8.0-9.4 Soil X X X X X X X01SB02 0102SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 200 southeast of Landfill Road adjacent0141SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X to gravel access road Duplicate (0102SB02)0102SB04 2.5-4.2 Soil X X X X X X X01SB03 0103SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Adjacent to Landfill Road and the landfill gate0103SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X entering from Charlestown State Park0103SB08 6.0-8.0 Soil X X X X X X X MS/MSD01SB04 0104SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 200 west-northwest of Jersey Avenue0104SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X and Landfill Road intersection0104SB11 10.0-11.0 Soil X X X X X X X01SB05 0105SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 southwest of 01SB030105SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X0105SB08 6.0-7.6 Soil X X X X X X X01SB06 0106SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 125 west of 01SB050106SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X0106SB10 8.0-9.6 Soil X X X X X X X01SB07 0107SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 175 west of 01SB060107SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X0107SB12 10.0-11.9 Soil X X X X X X X MS/MSD01SB08 0108SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 west of 01SB070108SB08 6.0-8.2 Soil X X X X X X X01SB09 0109SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 west of 01SB080109SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X0109SB08 6.0-8.4 Soil X X X X X X X01SB10 0110SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 150 south of 01SB09, adjacent to0142SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X facility boundary fence Duplicate (0110SB02)ParametersQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 1 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Pest/PCBs3Metals4Nitrate / Nitrite5TPH6Herbicides7 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters0110SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X0110SB08 6.0-7.7 Soil X X X X X X X01SB11 0111SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 southeast of 01SB10, adjacent to0111SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X facility boundary fence0111SB08 6.0-7.7 Soil X X X X X X X0143SB08 6.0-7.7 Soil X X X X X X X Duplicate (0111SB08)01SB12 0112SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 75 east of 01SB110112SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X0112SB08 6.0-8.4 Soil X X X X X X X01SB13 0113SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 southeast of 01SB11, adjacent to0113SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X facility boundary fence0113SB09 7.0-9.1 Soil X X X X X X X01SB14 0114SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 east of 01SB130114SB05 4.0-5.1 Soil X X X X X X X01SB15 0115SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 125 east of 01SB14, and approx. 1750115SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X northeast of facility boundary fence0115SB07 6.0-7.2 Soil X X X X X X X01SB16 0116SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 east of 01SB03 north of and0116SB05 3.0-5.1 Soil X X X X X X X adjacent to Landfill Road01SB17 0117SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 175 north of 01SB16 and 225 west0117SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X of Jersey Avenue0117SB11 8.0-10.6 Soil X X X X X X X MS/MSD01SB18 0118SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 northwest of 01SB170118SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X0118SB12 10.0-11.5 Soil X X X X X X X0144SB12 10.0-11.5 Soil X X X X X X X Duplicate (0118SB12)01SB19 0119SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 125 west of 01SB170119SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X XQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 2 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Pest/PCBs3Metals4Nitrate / Nitrite5TPH6Herbicides7 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters0119SB08 6.0-7.8 Soil X X X X X X X01SB20 0120SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 125 west-northwest of 01SB180120SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X0120SB08 6.0-7.8 Soil X X X X X X X MS/MSD01SB21 0121SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 100 east of facility boundary fence and0121SB06 4.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X X X 700 north of Landfill road0121SB10 8.0-9.6 Soil X X X X X X X01SB22 0122SB02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X X Approx. 275 southeast of 01SB21 and 3500122SB04 2.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X X X north of Landfill Road0122SB10 8.0-10.0 Soil X X X X X X X01SW/SD01 0101SD00 0.0-2.0 Sediment X X X X X X X Approx. 20 south of Landfill Road and 10 east0116SD00 0.0-2.0 Sediment X X X X X X X of facility boundary fence Duplicate (0101SD00)0101SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X0116SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X Duplicate (0101SW00)01SW/SD02 0102SD00 0.0-2.0 Sediment X X X X X X X In drainage adjacent to 01SB06 MS/MSD0102SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X MS/MSD01SW/SD03 0103SD00 0.0-2.0 Sediment X X X X X X X In drainage approx. 50 east of 01SB050103SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X01SW/SD04 0104SD00 0.0-2.0 Sediment X X X X X X X In drainage 200 north of 01SB20 and 350 west0104SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X of Jersey Avenue01SW/SD05 0105SD00 0.0-2.0 Sediment X X X X X X X In drainage 25 east of 01SB20 and 350 west0105SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X of Jersey Avenue01SW/SD06 0106SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X X X In drainage adjacent to exposed debris and 1000106SW00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X west of Jersey Avenue01LC01 0101LC00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X Approx. 50 south of 01SB060113LC00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X Duplicate (0101LC00)Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 3 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Pest/PCBs3Metals4Nitrate / Nitrite5TPH6Herbicides7 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters01LC02 0102LC00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X XApprox. 300 north of Landfill Road and 325 westof Jersey AvenueMS/MSD01LC03 0103LC00 -- Surface Water X X X X X X X Approx. 100 north of 01LC02Notes: Abbreviations:1 TCL Volatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Method 5030 / Analysis Method 8260A. bgs = below ground surface2 ft = feetMS/MSD = Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate3 Duplicate = Quality Control Duplicate(original sample listed in parentheses).4 SB = Soil BoringSD = Sediment Sample5 Nitrate/Nitrite was prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 300. SW = Surface Water6 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) were prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 8015. LC = Leachate Sample7Samples were collected in 1996.All samples analyzed for chemical analysis were shipped EMAX Laboratory, Inc, of Torrance, California.Surface soil samples collected (from 0.0 to 2.0 ft bgs) during the Phase I RI use 02 forthe depth indicator portion of the Sample Identification.TCL Semivolatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 3520 (aqueous) and 3550(soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8270.TCL Pesticides and PCBs: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) /Analysis Method 8080.TAL Metals: Preparation Methods 3010/3020 (aqueous) and 3050B (soil) / Analysis Methods6010/7000.TCL Herbicides: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method8150.Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 4 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Nitroaromatics/Nitramines3Pesticides4Metals5LithologicDescription6 Sample Location Description Comments01DS23 0123DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 150 west of the facility boundary fence01523DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X and 375 north of Landfill Road Duplicate (0123DS01)0123DS05 4.0-5.0 Soil X X X X X0123DS08 7.0-8.0 Soil X X X X X01DS24 0124DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Within exposed debris area approx. 150 west0124DS05 4.0-5.0 Soil X X X X X of Jersey Avenue0124DS08 6.5-7.5 Soil X X X X X0124DW08 -- Groundwater X X X X X01DS25 0125DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 125 southwest of 01DS24 MS/MSD0125DS05 4.0-5.0 Soil X X X X X0125DS08 6.5-7.5 Soil X X X X X01DS26 0126DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 125 southeast of 01DS250126DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X0126DS10 8.5-9.5 Soil X X X X X0126DW13 -- Groundwater X X X X X01DS27 0127DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 75 south of 01SB05 and Landfill Road0127DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X Volume for VOCs only0127DS09 8.0-9.0 Soil X X X X X0127DW13 -- Groundwater X X X X X01DS28 0128DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 100 west of 01DS27 and 75 south0128DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X of Landfill Road MS/MSD0128DS12 11.0-12.0 Soil X X X X X01DS29 0129DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 300 west of 01DS28 and 20 east of the0129DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X facility boundary fence0129DS09 7.8-8.8 Soil X X X X X01529DS09 7.8-8.8 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (0129DS09)01DS30 0130DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 125 south of 01SB010130DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X0130DS08 6.5-7.5 Soil X X X X XParametersQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 1 of 5 7/14/2004TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Nitroaromatics/Nitramines3Pesticides4Metals5LithologicDescription6 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters01DS31 0131DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 250 southwest of 01DS30 QA Split0131DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X01DS32 0132DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Adjacent to exposed debris area 150 west of0132DS07 5.8-6.8 Soil X X X X X Jersey Avenue01DS33 0133DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 100 south of 01DS32 and 125 west0133DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X of Jersey Avenue0133DS10 9.0-10.0 Soil X X X X X01DS34 0134DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 200 north of 01DS32 and 150 west0134DS04 2.5-3.5 Soil X X X X X of Jersey Avenue01DS35 0135DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 150 north of 01SB20 and 325 west0135DS04 3.2-4.2 Soil X X X X X of Jersey Avenue01DS36 0136DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Adjacent to drainage 75 north of 01SB180136DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X0136DS08 6.7-7.7 Soil X X X X X01DS37 0137DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Adjacent to 01LC03 QA Split0137DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X0137DS09 8.0-9.0 Soil X X X X X01DS38 0138DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 100 west of 01SB19 and 350 east of the0138DS05 3.9-4.9 Soil X X X X X facility boundary fence01DS39 0139DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 125 north of 01SB03 and Landfill Road0139DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X0139DS08 6.9-8.4 Soil X X X X X01539DS08 6.9-8.4 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (0139DS08)01DS40 0140DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Adjacent to Landfill Road and 200 west of Jersey0140DS06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X Avenue/Landfill Road intersection0140DS08 7.0-8.0 Soil X X X X X01DS41 0141DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 15 west of Jersey Avenue/Lanfill0141DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X Road intersectionQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 2 of 5 7/14/2004TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Nitroaromatics/Nitramines3Pesticides4Metals5LithologicDescription6 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters0141DS07 5.9-6.9 Soil X X X X X01DS42 0142DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Adjacent to Jersey Avenue and 275 north of0142DS07 6.0-7.0 Soil X X X X X 01DS41 and Landfill Road0142DS14 13.0-14.0 Soil X X X X X01DS43 0143DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X East side of Jersey Avenue and 375 north of 01DS420143DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X0143DS07 6.2-7.2 Soil X X X X X01DS44 0144DS01 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 50 south of 01DS40 MS/MSD0144DS04 3.0-4.0 Soil X X X X X0144DS07 5.7-6.7 Soil X X X X X01TR01 0101TR10 8.5-9.5 Soil X X X X X Approx. 100 north of Landfill Road and 30 west ofJersey Avenue01TR02 0102TR07 5.5-6.5 Soil X X X X X Approx. 125 north of 01TR0101TR03 0103TR05 4.0-5.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 175 north of 01TR0201TR04 0104TR06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 150 north of 01TR0301TR05 0105TR05 4.0-4.7 Soil X X X X X East of Jersey Avenue, 75 north of 01TR0401TR06 0106TR07 6.0-7.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 300 south of 01SB05 and Lanfill Road01TR07 0107TR06 5.0-5.6 Soil X X X X X Approx. 175 west of 01TR06 MS/MSD01TR08 0108TR05 4.0-5.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 75 west of 01SB2001TR09 0109TR05 4.0-4.9 Soil X X X X X Approx. 350 north of 01SB06 and Landfill Rd.0159TR05 4.0-4.9 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (0109TR05)01TR10 0110TR04 3.0-3.5 Soil X X X X X Adjacent to 01DS24, 175 west of Jersey Ave.01TR11 0111TR02 0.0-2.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 60 east of 01DS3601TR12 0112TR02 1.5-2.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 40 east of 01DS35Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 3 of 5 7/14/2004TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Nitroaromatics/Nitramines3Pesticides4Metals5LithologicDescription6 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters01TR13 0113TR03 2.0-2.5 Soil X X X X X Approx. 40 west of 01DS3401TR14 0114TR04 3.5-4.2 Soil X X X X X Approx. 90 northwest of 01DS3201TR15 0115TR04 3.5-4.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 30 north of 01DS3601TR16 0116TR06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 20 west of 01SB21 QA Split01TR17 0117TR06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 20 south of 01SB2201TR18 0118TR03 2.5-3.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 10 east of 01DS3401TR19 0119TR05 4.0-5.5 Soil X X X X X Approx. 100 west of 01TR0301TR20 0120TR06 5.0-6.0 Soil X X X X X Approx. 80 east of 01DS3401TP01 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 200 north of 01TR04, west of Jersey Ave.01TP02 -- 0.0-8.0 Soil X Approx. 25 east of 01TR0601TP03 -- 0.0-5.0 Soil X Approx. 50 west of 01TR0801TP04 -- 0.0-2.5 Soil X Approx. 150 north of 01DS3801TP05 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 50 west of 01TP0401TP06 -- 0.0-1.5 Soil X Approx. 50 south of 01TR1701TP07 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 60 east of 01TP0601TP08 -- 0.0-4.0 Soil X Approx. 40 west of 01DS3301TP09 -- 0.0-2.0 Soil X Approx. 50 west of 01DS3401TP10 -- 0.0-1.7 Soil X Adjacent, north, of 01DS3401TP11 -- 0.0-3.5 Soil X Approx. 150 north of 01DS3601TP12 -- 0.0-2.0 Soil X Adjacent to 01DS3501TP13 -- 0.0-2.5 Soil X Approx. 30 west of 01TR16Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 4 of 5 7/14/2004TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs)SampleMatrixVOCs1SVOCs2Nitroaromatics/Nitramines3Pesticides4Metals5LithologicDescription6 Sample Location Description CommentsParameters01TP14 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 25 east of faciltiy fence and 450 north ofLandfill Road01TP15 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 50 east of 01TP1401TP16 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 30 southeast of 01TP1501TP17 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 40 east of 01DS2301TP18 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 70 north of 01DS3401TP19 -- 0.0-3.0 Soil X Approx. 70 west of 01TP0101SD07 0107SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X Adjacent to Landfill Road, 100 west of 01SW/SD0101SD08 0108SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X In drainage 450 east of Jersey Ave. at north end ofthe landfill areaQA Split01SD09 0109SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X In drainage 100 north of 01SW/SD0401SD10 0110SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X In drainage 40 north of 01SB18Notes: Abbreviations:1 bgs = below ground surfaceDS = Direct Push - Soil2 TR = TrenchSD = Sediment3 DW = Direct Push - Waterft = feet4 MS/MSD = Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike DuplicateAll samples were collected in 2002.5 Duplicate = Quality Control Duplicate (original sample ID in parentheses)6All investigative, duplicate and MS/MSD samples were shipped to EMAXLaboratory, Inc, of Torrance, California. QA Split samples were shipped to SevernTrent Laboratories, of Tallahassee, Florida and were labeled as a split sample.Nitroaromatics/nitramines were prepared and analyzed as identified in Method8330.Lithologic Description: Location completed for soil descriptions only. No sampleswere collected for chemical analysis.TCL Semivolatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Method 3520C (aqueous) and3550B (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8270C.TCL Volatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 5030 (aqueous) and 5035(soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8260B.Pesticides: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) /Analysis Method 8081A.TAL Metals: Preparation Method 3010A (aqueous) and 3050B (soil/sediment) /Analysis Method 6010B(7470A/7471A) (mercury liquid/solid).Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 5 of 5 7/14/2004TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANICVAPORS IN SOIL SAMPLES1SITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)01SB01 0.0-2.0 ND01SB01 4.0-6.0 ND01SB01 8.0-9.4 ND01SB02 0.0-2.0 ND01SB02 2.5-4.2 ND01SB03 0.0-2.0 ND01SB03 4.0-6.0 ND01SB03 6.0-8.0 ND01SB04 0.0-2.0 ND01SB04 2.0-4.0 11201SB04 10.0-11.0 ND01SB05 0.0-2.0 ND01SB05 2.0-4.0 9.001SB05 6.0-7.6 ND01SB06 0.0-2.0 1101SB06 4.0-6.0 ND01SB06 8.0-9.6 ND01SB07 0.0-2.0 ND01SB07 4.0-6.0 ND01SB07 10.0-11.9 ND01SB08 0.0-2.0 ND01SB08 6.0-8.2 ND01SB09 0.0-2.0 ND01SB09 4.0-6.0 ND01SB09 6.0-8.4 ND01SB10 0.0-2.0 ND01SB10 2.0-4.0 ND01SB10 6.0-7.7 ND01SB11 0.0-2.0 ND01SB11 2.0-4.0 ND01SB11 6.0-7.7 ND01SB12 0.0-2.0 ND01SB12 4.0-6.0 1.001SB12 6.0-8.4 ND01SB13 0.0-2.0 ND01SB13 2.0-4.0 ND01SB13 7.0-9.1 ND01SB14 0.0-2.0 ND01SB14 4.0-5.1 ND01SB15 0.0-2.0 ND01SB15 2.0-4.0 ND01SB15 6.0-7.2 ND01SB16 0.0-2.0 NDQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 1 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANICVAPORS IN SOIL SAMPLES1SITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)01SB16 3.0-5.1 ND01SB17 0.0-2.0 ND01SB17 4.0-6.0 ND01SB17 8.0-10.6 ND01SB18 0.0-2.0 ND01SB18 4.0-6.0 ND01SB18 10.0-11.5 ND01SB19 0.0-2.0 ND01SB19 4.0-6.0 3.001SB19 6.0-7.8 ND01SB20 0.0-2.0 ND01SB20 2.0-4.0 ND01SB20 6.0-7.8 ND01SB21 0.0-2.0 ND01SB21 4.0-6.0 ND01SB21 8.0-9.6 ND01SB22 0.0-2.0 ND01SB22 2.0-4.0 ND01SB22 8.0-10.0 ND01DS23 0.0-1.0 ND01DS23 4.0-5.0 ND01DS23 7.0-8.0 ND01DS24 0.0-1.0 ND01DS24 4.0-5.0 ND01DS24 6.5-7.5 ND01DS25 0.0-1.0 ND01DS25 4.0-5.0 ND01DS25 6.5-7.5 ND01DS26 0.0-1.0 ND01DS26 5.0-6.0 ND01DS26 8.5-9.5 ND01DS27 0.0-1.0 4.301DS27 5.0-6.0 1.001DS27 8.0-9.0 58001DS28 0.0-1.0 ND01DS28 5.0-6.0 ND01DS28 11.0-12.0 ND01DS29 0.0-1.0 ND01DS29 5.0-6.0 ND01DS29 7.8-8.8 ND01DS30 0.0-1.0 ND01DS30 3.0-4.0 ND01DS30 6.5-7.5 ND01DS31 0.0-1.0 NDQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 2 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANICVAPORS IN SOIL SAMPLES1SITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)01DS31 5.0-6.0 ND01DS32 0.0-1.0 ND01DS32 5.8-6.8 ND01DS33 0.0-1.0 ND01DS33 5.0-6.0 ND01DS33 9.0-10.0 ND01DS34 0.0-1.0 ND01DS34 2.5-3.5 ND01DS35 0.0-1.0 ND01DS35 3.2-4.2 ND01DS36 0.0-1.0 ND01DS36 3.0-4.0 ND01DS36 6.7-7.7 ND01DS37 0.0-1.0 5.001DS37 5.0-6.0 ND01DS37 8.0-9.0 ND01DS38 0.0-1.0 ND01DS38 3.9-4.9 ND01DS39 0.0-1.0 ND01DS39 3.0-4.0 ND01DS39 6.9-8.4 ND01DS40 0.0-1.0 ND01DS40 5.0-6.0 24.501DS40 7.0-8.0 ND01DS41 0.0-1.0 ND01DS41 3.0-4.0 ND01DS41 5.9-6.9 ND01DS42 0.0-1.0 ND01DS42 6.0-7.0 ND01DS42 13.0-14.0 ND01DS43 0.0-1.0 ND01DS43 3.0-4.0 ND01DS43 6.2-7.2 ND01DS44 0.0-1.0 ND01DS44 3.0-4.0 ND01DS44 5.7-6.7 ND01TR01 9.0-9.5 ND01TR02 6.0-6.5 ND01TR03 4.0-5.0 ND01TR04 5.0-6.0 ND01TR05 4.0-4.7 NDQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 3 of 4 7/14/2004TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANICVAPORS IN SOIL SAMPLES1SITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)01TR06 6.0-7.0 ND01TR07 5.0-5.6 ND01TR08 4.0-5.0 ND01TR09 4.0-4.9 ND01TR10 3.0-3.5 ND01TR11 0.0-2.0 ND01TR12 1.5-2.0 ND01TR13 2.0-2.5 ND01TR14 3.5-4.2 ND01TR15 3.5-4.0 ND01TR16 5.0-6.0 2.001TR17 5.0-6.0 9.001TR18 2.5-3.0 ND01TR19 4.0-5.5 5.001TR20 5.0-6.0 11.001SD01 0.0-2.0 ND01SD02 0.0-2.0 ND01SD03 0.0-2.0 ND01SD04 0.0-2.0 ND01SD05 0.0-2.0 ND01SD06 0.0-1.0 ND01SD07 0.0-1.0 NA201SD08 0.0-1.0 NA201SD09 0.0-1.0 NA201SD10 0.0-1.0 NA2Notes:1 Measured response above background using a PID.2 Not available due to PID malfunction.Abbreviations:ft = feet TR = Trench Samplebgs = Below Ground Surface ND = Not Detectedppm = Part Per Million NA = Not analyzedSB = Soil BoringDS = Direct Push Soil SampleSD = Sediment SampleSamples 01SB01 through 01SB22 and 01SD01 through 01SD06 werecollected during the Phase I RI (1996), and all other samples werecollected during the Phase II RFI (2002).Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 4 of 4 7/14/2004Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 3-13.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE FEATURESThe surface features at the site are shown on Figure 1-1. The Old Landfill is situated in anUpland area characterized by karst topography associated with shallow limestone bedrock. Ingeneral, the surface of the landfill slopes to the north-northwest with an elevation ranging fromabout 620 feet above MSL at the east end to about 590 feet above MSL at the northwest end(USGS 1993). The landfill surface is covered with grass, weeds and trees, and has severalapparent closed drainage systems, likely the result of differential settlement of buried landfillwaste and/or the karst topography. A small drainage ditch separates the portion of the landfill onthe north side of Landfill Road in to two areas.The Old Landfill is located within the Fourteen Mile Creek drainage basin. It is likely that smallamounts of surface water pond in depressions at the landfill and evaporate and/or infiltrate.However, the majority of the surface water drains northwest to nearby drainage ditches and thenflows to an unnamed tributary of Lick Creek located north of the landfill, then flows throughFourteen Mile Creek, and ultimately enters the Ohio River.Access to the site is through Gate 34 in the north fenced perimeter of INAAP and from JerseyAvenue in Charlestown State Park.3.2 LOCAL SURFICIAL GEOLOGYThis section describes the shallow surficial geology including the unconsolidated materials to thetop of bedrock at the Old Landfill. The local surficial geology of this site has been interpretedbased on the Phase I RI (W-C 1998) report, and 19 test pits, 20 trenches, and 22 direct-push soilborings completed for the Phase II RFI field investigation. A detailed discussion of bedrockstratigraphy can be found in the Draft Final Phase II RFI Installation Groundwater (URS 2003)report.3.2.1 Geophysical Survey ResultsThe geophysical investigation consisted of an EM survey to locate buried materials. Theapproximate area of the EM survey is shown on Figure 2-2. The results of the EM investigationat the Old Landfill are shown as Electromagnetic Contour Maps included as Figures 3-1 through3-4. Results for the horizontal dipole quadrature and inphase responses are shown on Figures 3-1 and 3-2, and the results for the vertical dipole quadrature and inphase responses are shown onFigures 3-3 and 3-4. Anomalies on these contour maps indicate potential areas of buried waste.The quadrature responses can be used to interpret geologic conditions and the presence of nearsurface soil disturbances. The inphase responses are more indicative of the presence of buriedmetal.The most notable feature on the EM contour maps was south of Landfill Road, where a relativelybroad area of anomalous quadrature and inphase response indicate that waste materials weredisposed of across the entire area. The areas on the inphase maps indicate that significantmetallic waste might be present beneath the central and eastern portions of this area. The linearPhysical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 3-2appearance of some of the anomalies visible on the inphase and quadrature maps indicatepossible disposal of waste in trenches. The results also indicated that the area of waste disposaldid not extend beyond the perimeter of the fence. Additionally, the EM contour maps depictsmall anomalies in some areas along the site perimeter; however, these anomalies appear to bethe result of interference from the perimeter barbed wire fence.In the area north of Landfill Road, no linear features are apparent. The horizontal dipolequadrature response map (Figure 3-1) indicated possible burial of materials or stockpiling of soil,but the inphase maps (Figures 3-2 and 3-4) indicated no significant amount of buried metallicdebris.3.2.2 Soil Borings, Trenches and Geotechnical ResultsThe locations of Phase I RI and the Phase II RFI soil borings, trenches and test pits are shown onFigure 2-1. Figure 3-5 shows the extent of buried materials and the locations of six interpretedgeologic cross-sections. The interpreted geologic cross-sections are shown on Figures 3-6through 3-11. Summaries of the Phase II RFI trenches and test pits, including basic stratigraphicinterpretations and depth to water observations, are presented in Table 3-1. Copies of the trench,test pit, and boring logs completed as part of the Phase II RFI are included in Appendix C.Trenching activities were primarily used to determine the extent of buried waste materials at theOld Landfill. Soil borings and trenches were used to characterize the types of debris present inthe landfill and to collect analytical soil samples. The majority of the landfill contained a mix ofgeneral refuse and construction debris. However, one small area in the northeastern portion ofthe Old Landfill, along Jersey Avenue (see Figure 3-5), consisted primarily of constructiondebris. Much of the area immediately adjacent to Jersey Avenue did contain general refuse.Newspaper headlines and billing invoices uncovered in trench 01TR03 indicate the materialsexcavated at this trench were dumped there no earlier than May of 1971. In most cases, the areasof disturbance (soil and waste fill) identified in the EM response maps, Figures 3-1 through 3-4,correlate fairly well with the areal extent of waste disposal activities identified through soilborings and trenches. However, the north of Old Landfill Road, trenching activities indicatedburied materials extended west of the area covered by the EM survey. In the portion of the OldLandfill north of Landfill Road, (Figure 3-5) the EM quadrature results (Figures 3-1 and 3-3)indicated possible waste disposal activities, while the inphase responses (Figures 3-2 and 3-4)noted little metallic debris.Trenching activities provided the most accurate characterization of the types of materials buriedin the Old Landfill, although trenching was mostly completed along the edges of the landfill.General refuse identified in trenches included:· plastic trash bags with household refuse· aluminum cans· clothing· white and red linen and thread spools· scrap woodPhysical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 3-3· scrap metal· newspaper· aerosol cans· empty 30-gallon steel drums and drum lids· eight-inch diameter rubber gasketsConstruction debris encountered in the landfill included:· scrap lumber· creosote-treated railroad ties and other timbers· transite siding· light fixtures and copper wire electrical conduit· PVC pipe· brick· concrete· roofing felt, roofing tar and composite asphalt shingles· drywall· steel cableGenerally, buried debris was observed ranging from one foot to approximately ten feet bgs.Buried materials were underlain by silty clay fill, residual soils or limestone bedrock. Soil coverover the debris was typically a few feet or less. Surface debris was noted in areas south ofLandfill Road, along the banks of the drainage ditch that bisects the northern landfill area, and inthe area marked as primarily construction debris (Figure 3-5).Fill soil was encountered at most of the trench and soil boring locations and consisted primarilyof low plastic silty clay. Fill soil thickness varied from a few feet to approximately 14 feet, asindicated on the geologic-cross sections. The greatest thickness of silty clay fill occurred atboring 01DS42 (Cross-section A-A’). This location is near a drainage and may have beenbackfilled entirely with soil fill.Residual clay soils were encountered at ground surface or beneath the buried materials and clayfill. The residual clay soils, ranging from a few feet to approximately 10 feet bgs, were underlainby limestone bedrock.In summary, the materials encountered were typically described as:· Fill material – including general refuse and construction debris, as listed above.· Silty clay fill – Soft to stiff, dry to moist, reddish-brown to greenish- or grayish-brown,low plastic silty clay (USCS symbol CL).· Residual clay – Medium stiff to hard, dry to moist, reddish- to yellowish-brown, lowto medium plastic silty clay (USCS Symbol CL)· Limestone – No samples from the borings or trenches were recovered for description.Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 3-43.3 SHALLOW HYDROGEOLOGYGroundwater was encountered in limited quantities in five direct push soil borings, and varyingamounts of water infiltrated 6 of the 20 trenches completed during the Phase II RFI fieldinvestigation. While five direct push borings exhibited some degree of groundwater infiltration,only three borings produced enough groundwater for sample collection. The soil borings,trenches and depth at which water was encountered are presented in Table 3-2. Temporarygroundwater monitoring points were installed in three direct push borings (01DS24, 01DS26 and01DS27), which is further described in Section 2.5.The groundwater encountered in trenches 01TR03, 01TR16 and 01TR17 was perched in burieddebris, with dry clay fill or soil below the debris. Groundwater measurements in boring 01DS27indicated perched water might have entered the boring as well. Water was encountered at orvery near the bottom of the other trenches and borings, likely indicating the water was perchedon top of bedrock.TABLE 3-1SUMMARY OF TRENCHING AND TEST PIT DESCRIPTIONSSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLTrench/TestPitIdentificationLength(ft bgs)Width(ft bgs)Depth(ft bgs)Surface (1) (2)MaterialDepth toFirst Contact(ft bgs)Material BelowContactDepth toSecondContact(ft bgs)Material BelowContactDepth toThirdContact(ft bgs)Material BelowContactDepth toBedrock(ft bgs)Depth toWater(ft bgs) Comments0101TP 10.0 2.0 3.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0102TP 10.0 2.0 8.0 Silty clay fill 8.0 Limestone NA NA NA NA 8.0 NE No debris or trash in clay fill.0103TP 12.0 2.0 5.0 Silty clay fill 1.5 - 3.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NE NE0104TP 5.0 2.0 2.5 Trash under thin topsoil NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE Trash included plastic, paper, lumber.0105TP 5.0 2.0 3.0 Silty clay fill 1.5 Trash NA NA NA NA NE NE Trash included plastic, wood, white linen (bag cloth) threadspools (from LAP).0106TP 8.0 2.0 1.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0107TP 7.0 2.0 3.0 Silty clay fill with trash 1.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NE NE Trash included general refuse.0108TP 10.0 2.0 4.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0109TP 7.0 2.0 2.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0110TP 7.5 2.0 1.7 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0111TP 7.0 2.0 3.5 Silty clay fill 3.5 Limestone NA NA NA NA NE NE0112TP 6.0 2.0 2.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0113TP 6.0 2.0 2.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0114TP 6.0 2.0 3.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0115TP 6.0 2.0 3.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0116TP 6.0 2.0 3.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0117TP 6.0 2.0 3.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE0118TP 8.0 2.0 2.0 Silty clay fill with wood 2.0 Limestone NA NA NA NA 2.0 NE Large wood planks encountered in upper 1 foot.0119TP 10.0 2.0 3.0 Silty clay fill with debris 0.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NE NE Debris included wood and brick fragments.0101TR 10.0 2.0 9.5 Silty clay fill 1.7 Trash 8.8 Residual silty clay 9.5 Limestone 9.5 9.3 Slight odor; breathing zone = 1.4 ppm. Trash includededlumber, particle board, spools of thread (from LAP), plastic, popcans, 8 diameter rubber gaskets, roofing felt, crushed rock.0102TR 13.0 2.0 10.0 Silty clay fill 1.2 Trash 6.7 Residual silty clay NA NA NE NE Trash includeded lumber, plastic, spools of thread (from LAP),steel bands.0103TR 12.0 2.0 10.0 Silty clay fill 3.2 Gravel layer 3.4 Clay fill 9.7 Residual silty clay NE NE0104TR 13.0 2.0 9.6 Silty clay fill with trash 0 - 6 Residual silty clay 0 - 9.6 Limestone NA NA 9.6 NE Trash included 30-gal drum lids, round red cloth swatches, popcans, roofing felt, plastic trash bags, crushed rock.0105TR 12.0 2.0 5.0 Crushed rock with clay fill 1.5 Residual silty clay 3.0 - 5.0 Limestone NA NA 5.0 NE0106TR 10.0 2.0 8.3 Silty clay fill 3.2 Clay fill 4.0 Trash 6.1 Clay fill and trash 8.3 8.1 Trash included wood, glass, plastic, pop cans, scrap metalclothes, 30-gal. drum lids.0107TR 10.0 2.0 6.2 Silty clay fill with trash 5.5 Residual silty clay 6.2 Limestone NA NA 6.2 NE Trash included wood, plastic, cloth, 30-gal. drums and lids.0108TR 12.0 2.0 10.0 Silty clay fill with trash 7.0 Silty clay fill 9.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NE NE Trash included plastic, clothing, wood, cans and paper.0109TR 12.0 2.0 4.9 Silty clay fill with trash 4.5 Residual silty clay 4.9 Limestone NA NA NE NE Trash included wood, red cloth, white cloth (bag linen) glassbottles, thread spools (from LAP), and scrap metal.Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 1 of 2 7/15/2004TABLE 3-1SUMMARY OF TRENCHING AND TEST PIT DESCRIPTIONSSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLTrench/TestPitIdentificationLength(ft bgs)Width(ft bgs)Depth(ft bgs)Surface (1) (2)MaterialDepth toFirst Contact(ft bgs)Material BelowContactDepth toSecondContact(ft bgs)Material BelowContactDepth toThirdContact(ft bgs)Material BelowContactDepth toBedrock(ft bgs)Depth toWater(ft bgs) Comments0110TR 15.0 2.0 6.0 Silty clay fill with trash 3.0 - 6.0 Silty clay fill with tree limbs NA NA NA NA 5.0 NE Trash included lumber, plastic, metal pipe, scrap metal.0111TR 12.0 2.0 3.8 Silty clay fill with debris 0 -2.0 Residual silty clay 8.0 Limestone NA NA 3.8 - 5.8 NE Debris included concrete and lumber.0112TR 12.0 2.0 6.5 Silty clay fill with ties 0 - 3.0 Residual silty clay 6.5 Limestone NA NA 3.5 - 6.5 NE Railroad ties.0113TR 10.0 2.0 2.5 Silty clay fill with ties 2.5 Limestone NA NA NA NA 2.5 NE Railroad ties.0114TR 10.0 2.0 4.2 Silty clay fill with debris 4.2 Limestone NA NA NA NA 4.2 NE Debris inlcuded transite siding, timbers, and small amount ofplastic debris.0115TR 10.0 2.0 7.8 Silty clay fill with debris 2.0 - 4.0 Residual silty clay 7.8 Limestone NA NA 7.8 NE Debris inlcuded lumber.0116TR 11.0 2.0 10.0 Silty clay fill with debris 8.5 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NE NE Debris included scrap wood, plastic, roofing tar, metal banding.Small amount of water drained from fill into bottom of trench.0117TR 14.0 2.0 10.0 Silty clay fill with debris 9.0 Residual silty clay NA NA NA NA NE NE Clay fill contained some metal banding, plastic, lumber. Thinlayer of debris from 5.5 to 6.5 feet on NNE end of trench, withpossible pipe insulation, metal drum, black staining.0118TR 9.0 2.0 6.0 Silty clay fill with debris 2.5 Silty clay fill 6.0 - 8.0 Limestone NA NA 6.0 - 8.0 NE Debris included brick, transite siding, light fixture, scrap woodand plastic.0119TR 10.0 2.0 9.0 Silty clay fill with debris 5.0 Residual silty clay 9.0 Limestone NA NA 9.0 NE Debris included wood, brick, plastic conduit, transite, crusheddrum, rubber, composite shingles and steel cable.0120TR 11.0 2.0 8.7 Silty clay fill with debris 4.0 Tar roofing material and gravel 4.5 Silty clay fill 7.5 Residual silty clay 8.7 NE Debris included brick, lumber and rubber gaskets.Notes:(1) Crushed rock refers to 2- to 4-inch crushed limestone gravel.(2) The major division, according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), is capitalized for each material description.bgs = below ground surfaceDP = Direct pushft = feetHS = headspaceNA = Not applicableNC = NitrocelluloseNE = Not encounteredppm = Part-per-millionQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 2 of 2 7/15/2004TABLE 3-2BORING AND TRENCH LOCATIONS WHERE GROUNDWATER WAS ENCOUNTEREDSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLBoring/TrenchNumberDepth ofBoring/Trench(ft bgs)Depth to Water(ft bgs) Comments01DS24 7.5 7.0 Measurement taken at time of drilling.01DS26 9.5 7.0 Measurement taken 5 minutes after completing boring.01DS27 9.0 5.0 Water at 7 ft bgs at time of drilling; measured at 5 ft bgs about15 minutes after completing boring.01DS28 12.0 11.9 Measurement taken 10 minutes after completing boring.01DS37 9.0 8.8 Measurement taken 20 minutes after completing boring.01TR01 9.5 9.3 Water encountered at the base of the trench.01TR03 10.0 9.8About 2 inches of water accumulated in the south end of thetrench.01TR06 8.3 8.0About 3.5 inches of water accumulated in the south end of thetrench.01TR10 6.0 5.0 Had to stop trenching due to unstable sidewalls.01TR16 10.0 6.5 Approximately 10 gallons drained from debris layer into bottomof trench.01TR17 10.0 6.5 Approximately 30 gallons drained from debris layer into bottomof trench.ft = feetbgs = below ground surfaceQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 1 of 1 7/14/2004Data Quality Review and ValidationSECTIONFOUR Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 4-14.1 PHASE I RIThe pesticide/PCB results for one sample (0116SBN05) were rejected due to poor surrogaterecoveries. Additionally, reporting limits were elevated due to soil moisture content, whichranged from 15 percent to 30 percent. The elevated reporting limits were compared to riskscreening criteria and judged not to impact the use of the data for decision-making purposes.The analytical data for samples collected during the Phase I RI field activities were determinedto be acceptable, with the exception of the rejected results. See the Phase I RI report (W-C 1998)for a more detailed discussion of data review and validation issues.4.2 PHASE II RFIAll chemical data were reviewed following procedures identified in the INAPP Site WideQuality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) (URSGWC 2000), and the USACE LouisvilleChemistry Guideline (LCG) (USACE 2002). For select samples, RDX data were rejected (R)based on a low reporting limit verification recovery (-42%D) and DDT data were rejected basedon low calibration verification recoveries (-27%D, -26%D, -23%D, and -22%D). Based the ondata reviews, analytical data for several samples collected at the Old Landfill were qualifiedestimated (J/UJ) for select compounds based on the following evaluation criteria:· LCS recoveries outside evaluation criteria for hexachlorocyclopentadiene (30-130%) rangedfrom 16-25%. The LCG states that for recoveries less than 30% should be flagged J/R.However, the lower limit for hexachlorocyclopentadiene was 30% and this compound hashistorically yielded low recoveries. The low LCS recoveries were greater than 50% of thelower limit; therefore URS qualified the hexachlorocyclopentadiene data J/UJ. LCSrecoveries outside evaluation criteria for styrene (70-130%) were both 58% and the data wasqualified J/UJ.· MS recoveries for antimony, barium, calcium, cobalt, iron and lead were outside evaluationcriteria for metals (75-125%). The antimony MS recoveries ranged from 14-54%, bariumMS recoveries ranged from (-36) – 57%), a calcium MS recovery of 47% was determined,cobalt MS recoveries ranged from 68-69%, an iron MS recovery of 67% was determined andlead MS recoveries ranged from 57-62%. Metals data associated with recoveries less than30% were qualified J/R and data associated with recoveries less than the lower limit butgreater than 30% were qualified J/UJ.· Surrogate recoveries outside evaluation criteria for pesticides (45-143%) ranged from 152-623%. Detected pesticides associated with surrogates outside evaluation criteria werequalified J. Surrogate recoveries outside evaluation criteria for VOCs (70-190%) rangedfrom 193-200%. Detected VOCs associated with surrogates outside evaluation criteria werequalified J.Additionally, select VOC data for the Old Landfill samples were qualified non-detect (U) basedon the presence of the compounds in the method blank samples or based on professionaljudgment (common laboratory contaminants). A complete summary of the data reviews andData Quality Review and ValidationSECTIONFOUR Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 4-2validations are presented in Appendix A, and table A-1 summarizes all qualifiers applied to thedata based on the data review and validation findings.The analytical data for samples collected at the Old Landfill were determined to be acceptable(including estimated data) for the intended data use, with the exception of the rejected RDX andDDT data. Completeness, defined to be the percentage of analytical results which are judged tobe valid, including estimated (J/UJ) data, was 99 percent for the Old Landfill.Chemical Investigation ResultsSECTIONFIVE Old Landfill, Site 1Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Final\Site 01 Secs 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\14-Jul-04 /OMA 5-1Samples collected at the Old Landfill were analyzed for one or more of the following analyses(as indicated on Tables 2-1 and 2-2): Target Compound List (TCL) VOCs, SVOCs,pesticides/PCBs, herbicides, nitroaromatic/nitramine compounds, Target Analyte List (TAL)metals, TPH – diesel range organics, and nitrate/nitrite. Samples were collected from thefollowing matrices: Near surface soil, subsurface soil, sediment, groundwater, and surface water(including leachate). Analytical results for field duplicate samples are presented in Appendix E.Field duplicate samples and associated parent sample identifications are listed in the followingtable.Field Duplicate Associated Sample0141SB02 0102SB020142SB02 0110SB020143SB08 0111SB080144SB12 0118SB120116SD00 0101SD000116SW00 0101SW000113LC00 0101LC0001523DS01 0123DS0101529DS09 0129DS0901539DS08 0139DS080159TR05 0109TR05During the Phase II RFI field investigation, quality assurance (QA) split samples were collectedat the Old Landfill and analyzed by Severn-Trent Laboratories (STL), Tallahassee, Florida. QAsplit sample results for samples collected as part of the Phase II RFI investigation are included inAppendix E. The QA split samples and associated parent sample identifications are listed in thefollowing table.QA Split Sample Associated Sample0131DS01 0131DS01QA0137DS01 0137DS01QA0116TR06 0116TR06QA0108SD00 0108SD00QASummaries of the chemical investigation results can be found as follows:· Surface and subsurface soil, sediment, surface water, leachate and groundwatersamples collected from this site and the types of analyses are summarized in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.· Chemicals detected, maximum concentration, and frequency of detects for soil andsediment samples collected from the Old Landfill are summarized in Table 5-1.· Chemicals detected, maximum concentration, and frequency of detects for surfacewater, leachate and groundwater samples collected from the Old Landfill aresummarized in Table 5-2.· Appendix E contains all analytical results.TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD ID 0101SB02 0101SB06 0101SB09 0101SD00 0101TR10DATE COLLECTED January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 24, 1996 September 25, 2002Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 27 9/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 64 UAcetone 680 J 55/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U 37 < 64 UBenzene 17 7/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 6.4 UCarbon disulfide 33 12/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 6.4 UChlorobenzene 52 20/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 6.4 UEthylbenzene 160 10/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 6.4 Um/p-Xylene 240 13/85 < 6.4 UMethylene Chloride 24 J 8/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 6.4 Uo-Xylene 140 7/85 < 6.4 UTetrachloroethylene 9 J 3/153 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 U < 6.4 UToluene 58 40/153 5 J 1 J 3 J < 14 U < 6.4 UXylenes, total 430 J 7/68 < 12 U < 12 U < 14 U < 14 USEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1000 2/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 1800 U2-Methylnaphthalene 8800 9/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UAcenaphthene 3100 9/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UAcenaphthylene 460 2/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UAnthracene 5300 15/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UBenzo[a]anthracene 11000 22/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UBenzo[a]pyrene 8900 19/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UBenzo[b]fluoranthene 12000 24/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U 540 900 JBenzo[g,h,i]perylene 6400 17/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UBenzo[k]fluoranthene 4400 13/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UBis(2-chloroethyl) ether 390 J 1/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 3800 24/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 1800 UButylbenzyl phthalate 1500 12/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UCarbazole 3300 13/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UChrysene 11000 28/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U 410 900 JDi-n-butyl phthalate 4400 29/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 1100 U 3500 < 900 UDibenz(a,h)anthracene 1400 J 10/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UDibenzofuran 1400 J 8/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 1 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD ID 0101SB02 0101SB06 0101SB09 0101SD00 0101TR10DATE COLLECTED January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 24, 1996 September 25, 2002Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualDiethyl phthalate 48 J 1/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UFluoranthene 25000 30/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U 920 900Fluorene 3300 10/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UIndeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 5200 15/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3100 14/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UNaphthalene 670 4/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 1800 UNitrobenzene 1400 J 1/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 1800 UPentachlorophenol 26000 J 6/152 < 980 U < 990 U < 1100 U < 1100 U < 1800 UPhenanthrene 22000 22/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UPhenol 2500 3/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U < 900 UPyrene 21000 35/152 < 400 U < 410 U < 460 U < 460 U 710 900 JPESTICIDES (ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 19 J 9/151 < 4 UJ < 4.1 UJ < 4.6 UJ < 4.6 U < 5.4 U4,4-DDE 50 J 16/151 < 4 U < 4.1 U < 4.6 U < 4.6 U < 5.4 U4,4-DDT 20 J 20/151 < 4 U < 4.1 U < 4.6 U 0.96 J < 5.4 UAldrin 18 J 3/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 5.4 Ualpha-Benzenehexachloride 14 7/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 2.7 Ualpha-Chlordane 27 J 7/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U 0.11 J < 2.7 Ubeta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 43 13/151 0.63 J < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 5.4 Udelta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 0.38 J 6/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 2.7 UDieldrin 51 J 19/151 < 4 UJ < 4.1 UJ < 4.6 UJ 0.66 J < 5.4 UEndosulfan I 10 4/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 2.7 UEndosulfan II 5.5 3/151 < 4 U < 4.1 U < 4.6 U < 4.6 U < 5.4 UEndosulfan sulfate 13 7/151 < 4 U < 4.1 U < 4.6 U < 4.6 U < 5.4 UEndrin 26 J 8/151 < 4 UJ < 4.1 UJ < 4.6 UJ 0.07 J < 5.4 UEndrin aldehyde 16 J 4/151 < 4 U < 4.1 U < 4.6 U < 4.6 U < 5.4 UEndrin ketone 24 11/151 < 4 U < 4.1 U < 4.6 U < 4.6 U < 5.4 Ugamma-Chlordane 6.1 10/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 2.7 UHeptachlor 13 9/151 < 2.1 UJ < 2.1 UJ < 2.4 UJ < 2.4 U < 2.7 UHeptachlor epoxide 64 J 8/151 < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.4 U < 2.7 ULindane 6.9 3/151 < 2.1 UJ < 2.1 UJ < 2.4 UJ < 2.4 U < 2.7 UMethoxychlor 170 17/151 < 2.5 UJ < 2.3 UJ < 24 UJ 20 J < 27 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 2 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD ID 0101SB02 0101SB06 0101SB09 0101SD00 0101TR10DATE COLLECTED January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 24, 1996 September 25, 2002Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualNITROAROMATICS/NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 150 J 1/84 < 400 UPETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (μg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fraction 640000 5/68 < 24300 U < 24750 U < 28250 U < 27740 UMETALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 70200 152/152 13200 18600 41000 10000 31000 27.1Antimony 7.16 J 38/151 < 9.7 UJ < 9.9 UJ < 11.3 UJ < 11.1 U 3.22 13.6 JArsenic 62.9 152/152 10.1 J 13.4 J 31.6 J 9.8 17.4 1.36Barium 1630 152/152 176 178 253 178 182 1.36Beryllium 4.12 150/152 1 J 0.76 J 3.7 0.85 J 1.65 1.36Cadmium 1.6 6/152 < 0.97 U < 0.99 U < 1.1 U < 1.1 U < 1.36 UCalcium 128000 152/152 3950 1050 J 15000 15600 J 3910 136Chromium 97.1 152/152 13.3 J 17.8 J 31.7 J 41.7 J 38.8 2.71Cobalt 90.1 152/152 11 J 17.8 9 J 23.8 13.1 2.71Copper 126 152/152 12.6 15.2 40.3 22.1 19.8 2.71Iron 74000 152/152 19700 29300 59500 36600 J 34000 27.1Lead 189 152/152 18.9 32.9 26.3 28 J 22.2 1.36Magnesium 4490 152/152 2180 1060 J 1860 2170 2440 136Manganese 7100 152/152 1640 1940 4020 4060 1450 1.36Mercury 2.06 89/152 < 0.1 U < 0.1 U 0.16 < 0.12 U 0.0735 0.136 JNickel 128 152/152 15.7 J 15.6 J 104 J 21.7 35.8 2.71Potassium 3320 152/152 852 J 837 J 1720 534 J 1860 678Selenium 5.1 88/152 < 1.2 U < 1.2 U < 1.4 U 1.9 1.43 1.36Silver 1.16 J 2/152 < 1.9 U < 2 U < 2.3 U < 2.2 U < 2.71 USodium 1020 J 135/152 134 J < 124 U 240 J 577 J 78.8 136 JThallium 19 59/152 3.2 2.5 6.8 < 1.9 U < 2.71 UVanadium 107 152/152 26.8 43.7 68.9 36.4 61.8 2.71Zinc 1150 152/152 58.9 J 82.2 J 349 J 90.8 J 145 1.36Notes:ND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 3 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD ID 0101SB02 0101SB06 0101SB09 0101SD00 0101TR10DATE COLLECTED January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 24, 1996 September 25, 2002Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualU = NondetectUJ = Estimated NondetectR = RejectedE = Value exceeds linear range.mg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramBlank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample was not analyzed for theseparameters.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1996) with data from the Phase II RFI(2002).Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000 was obtained from theArmy Environmental Center database and therefore do not include RLs for detectedcompounds.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analyte was detected in the samples.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions and reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reported concentration for each analyte.Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 4 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 27 9/153Acetone 680 J 55/153Benzene 17 7/153Carbon disulfide 33 12/153Chlorobenzene 52 20/153Ethylbenzene 160 10/153m/p-Xylene 240 13/85Methylene Chloride 24 J 8/153o-Xylene 140 7/85Tetrachloroethylene 9 J 3/153Toluene 58 40/153Xylenes, total 430 J 7/68SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1000 2/1522-Methylnaphthalene 8800 9/152Acenaphthene 3100 9/152Acenaphthylene 460 2/152Anthracene 5300 15/152Benzo[a]anthracene 11000 22/152Benzo[a]pyrene 8900 19/152Benzo[b]fluoranthene 12000 24/152Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 6400 17/152Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4400 13/152Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 390 J 1/152Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 3800 24/152Butylbenzyl phthalate 1500 12/152Carbazole 3300 13/152Chrysene 11000 28/152Di-n-butyl phthalate 4400 29/152Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1400 J 10/152Dibenzofuran 1400 J 8/1520102SB02 0102SB04 0102SD00 0102TR07 0103SB02January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U < 61 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U 65 < 100 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U 17 6.1 < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U 30 6.1 < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U 1 J < 6.1 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U 72 6.1 < 12 U240 6.1< 12 U < 13 U 6 J < 6.1 U < 12 U140 6.1< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U < 6.1 U < 12 U2 J 3 J < 13 U 17 6.1 2 J< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U < 12 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 4400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 1300 2200 J < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 3100 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 2200 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 5300 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 11000 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 8900 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 12000 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 6400 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 4400 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 2200 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 420 U < 4400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 2200 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 3300 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 10000 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 420 U < 2200 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 1400 2200 J < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 1400 2200 J < 400 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 5 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 48 J 1/152Fluoranthene 25000 30/152Fluorene 3300 10/152Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 5200 15/152N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3100 14/152Naphthalene 670 4/152Nitrobenzene 1400 J 1/152Pentachlorophenol 26000 J 6/152Phenanthrene 22000 22/152Phenol 2500 3/152Pyrene 21000 35/152PESTICIDES (ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 19 J 9/1514,4-DDE 50 J 16/1514,4-DDT 20 J 20/151Aldrin 18 J 3/151alpha-Benzenehexachloride 14 7/151alpha-Chlordane 27 J 7/151beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 43 13/151delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 0.38 J 6/151Dieldrin 51 J 19/151Endosulfan I 10 4/151Endosulfan II 5.5 3/151Endosulfan sulfate 13 7/151Endrin 26 J 8/151Endrin aldehyde 16 J 4/151Endrin ketone 24 11/151gamma-Chlordane 6.1 10/151Heptachlor 13 9/151Heptachlor epoxide 64 J 8/151Lindane 6.9 3/151Methoxychlor 170 17/1510102SB02 0102SB04 0102SD00 0102TR07 0103SB02January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 2200 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 25000 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 3300 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 5200 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 2000 2200 J < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 4400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 4400 U < 400 U< 960 U < 1000 U < 1000 U < 4400 U < 980 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 22000 2200 < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U < 2200 U < 400 U< 400 U < 430 U < 420 U 21000 2200 < 400 U< 4 U < 4.3 U < 4.2 U 19 27 J < 4 U< 4 U < 4.3 U < 4.2 U 50 27 J < 4 U0.26 J 0.4 J 1.4 J < 27 U 0.31 J< 2 UJ < 2.2 UJ < 2.2 U < 27 U < 2.1 UJ< 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 13 U < 2.1 U< 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U 12 13 J < 2.1 U< 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U 27 27 < 2.1 U0.16 J 0.22 J 0.38 J < 13 U 0.14 J0.11 J 0.1 J 0.4 J 51 27 J 0.14 J< 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 13 U < 2.1 U< 4 U < 4.3 U 0.37 J < 27 U < 4 U< 4 U < 4.3 U 0.11 J < 27 U < 4 U< 4 UJ < 4.3 UJ < 4.2 U < 27 U < 4 UJ< 4 U < 4.3 U 0.16 J 16 27 J < 4 U< 4 U < 4.3 U 0.13 J < 27 U < 4 U< 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 13 U < 2.1 U< 2 UJ < 2.2 UJ < 2.2 U 13 13 < 2.1 UJ< 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U 64 13 J < 2.1 U< 2 UJ < 2.2 UJ < 2.2 U < 13 U < 2.1 UJ< 20 U < 22 U 5.7 J 60 130 J < 21 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 6 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS/NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 150 J 1/84PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (μg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fraction 640000 5/68METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 70200 152/152Antimony 7.16 J 38/151Arsenic 62.9 152/152Barium 1630 152/152Beryllium 4.12 150/152Cadmium 1.6 6/152Calcium 128000 152/152Chromium 97.1 152/152Cobalt 90.1 152/152Copper 126 152/152Iron 74000 152/152Lead 189 152/152Magnesium 4490 152/152Manganese 7100 152/152Mercury 2.06 89/152Nickel 128 152/152Potassium 3320 152/152Selenium 5.1 88/152Silver 1.16 J 2/152Sodium 1020 J 135/152Thallium 19 59/152Vanadium 107 152/152Zinc 1150 152/152Notes:ND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = Estimated0102SB02 0102SB04 0102SD00 0102TR07 0103SB02January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U< 24240 U < 26110 U < 25580 U < 24330 U14800 17400 13900 20500 26.8 17700< 9.7 UJ < 10.4 UJ < 10.2 U 7.16 13.4 J < 9.7 UJ12.7 23.1 12.8 21.5 1.34 12.967.7 176 185 1630 1.34 84.3< 0.48 U 1.5 0.96 J 0.875 1.34 J 0.6 J< 0.97 U 1.3 < 1 U < 1.34 U < 0.97 U6240 7960 2260 J 16700 134 144018.7 J 21.5 J 37.7 J 97.1 2.68 17.9 J11.8 J 16.6 23.8 24.6 2.68 10.7 J14.1 21 10.9 126 2.68 15.325300 34600 27700 65800 26.8 2780021.6 27 28.1 J 143 1.34 24.51950 1110 J 1190 J 3560 134 2050883 3010 2270 J 2060 1.34 533< 0.1 U < 0.11 U < 0.11 U 0.407 0.134 < 0.1 U13.6 49.7 14.2 51.6 2.68 17.1729 J 938 J 737 J 1460 670 905 J< 1.2 U < 1.3 U < 1.3 U 2.02 1.34 < 1.2 U< 1.9 U < 2.1 U < 2 U 1.16 2.68 J < 1.9 U136 J 161 J 1020 J 219 134 130 J< 5.3 U < 4.4 U 7.7 < 2.68 U < 6.8 U33.5 48.6 40.5 42.2 2.68 32.958.7 215 62.3 1150 1.34 69.3Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 7 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyU = NondetectUJ = Estimated NondetectR = RejectedE = Value exceeds linear range.mg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramBlank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample was not analyzed for theseparameters.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1996) with data from the Phase II RFI(2002).Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000 was obtained from theArmy Environmental Center database and therefore do not include RLs for detectedcompounds.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analyte was detected in the samples.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions and reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reported concentration for each analyte.0102SB02 0102SB04 0102SD00 0102TR07 0103SB02January 15, 1996 January 15, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 8 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 27 9/153Acetone 680 J 55/153Benzene 17 7/153Carbon disulfide 33 12/153Chlorobenzene 52 20/153Ethylbenzene 160 10/153m/p-Xylene 240 13/85Methylene Chloride 24 J 8/153o-Xylene 140 7/85Tetrachloroethylene 9 J 3/153Toluene 58 40/153Xylenes, total 430 J 7/68SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1000 2/1522-Methylnaphthalene 8800 9/152Acenaphthene 3100 9/152Acenaphthylene 460 2/152Anthracene 5300 15/152Benzo[a]anthracene 11000 22/152Benzo[a]pyrene 8900 19/152Benzo[b]fluoranthene 12000 24/152Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 6400 17/152Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4400 13/152Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 390 J 1/152Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 3800 24/152Butylbenzyl phthalate 1500 12/152Carbazole 3300 13/152Chrysene 11000 28/152Di-n-butyl phthalate 4400 29/152Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1400 J 10/152Dibenzofuran 1400 J 8/1520103SB06 0103SB08 0103SD00 0103TR05 0104SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 51 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U 26 < 51 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 5.1 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 5.1 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 5.1 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U 50 5.1 < 12 U170 5.1< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 5.1 U < 12 U60 5.1< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 5.1 U < 12 U1 J 3 J < 14 U 9.6 5.1 1 J< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 12 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 790 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 790 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 9 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 48 J 1/152Fluoranthene 25000 30/152Fluorene 3300 10/152Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 5200 15/152N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3100 14/152Naphthalene 670 4/152Nitrobenzene 1400 J 1/152Pentachlorophenol 26000 J 6/152Phenanthrene 22000 22/152Phenol 2500 3/152Pyrene 21000 35/152PESTICIDES (ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 19 J 9/1514,4-DDE 50 J 16/1514,4-DDT 20 J 20/151Aldrin 18 J 3/151alpha-Benzenehexachloride 14 7/151alpha-Chlordane 27 J 7/151beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 43 13/151delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 0.38 J 6/151Dieldrin 51 J 19/151Endosulfan I 10 4/151Endosulfan II 5.5 3/151Endosulfan sulfate 13 7/151Endrin 26 J 8/151Endrin aldehyde 16 J 4/151Endrin ketone 24 11/151gamma-Chlordane 6.1 10/151Heptachlor 13 9/151Heptachlor epoxide 64 J 8/151Lindane 6.9 3/151Methoxychlor 170 17/1510103SB06 0103SB08 0103SD00 0103TR05 0104SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 790 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 790 U < 400 U< 990 U < 1100 U < 1100 U < 790 U < 960 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 410 U < 440 U < 450 U < 400 U < 400 U< 4.1 U < 4.4 U < 4.5 U < 4.8 U < 4 U< 4.1 U < 4.4 U < 4.5 U < 4.8 U < 4 U0.34 J < 4.4 U 0.88 J < 4.8 U 0.4 J< 2.1 UJ < 2.3 UJ < 2.3 U < 4.8 U < 2 UJ< 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 U< 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 U< 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.3 U < 4.8 U < 2 U0.3 J 0.2 J < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 U0.18 J < 4.4 UJ 0.08 J < 4.8 U 0.17 J0.11 J < 2.3 U < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 U< 4.1 U < 4.4 U < 4.5 U < 4.8 U < 4 U< 4.1 U < 4.4 U < 4.5 U < 4.8 U < 4 U< 4.1 UJ < 4.4 UJ 0.11 J < 4.8 U < 4 UJ< 4.1 U < 4.4 U < 4.5 U < 4.8 U < 4 U< 4.1 U < 4.4 U < 4.5 U < 4.8 U < 4 U< 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 U0.1 J < 2.3 UJ < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 UJ0.12 J < 2.3 U < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 U< 2.1 UJ < 2.3 UJ < 2.3 U < 2.4 U < 2 UJ< 21 U < 23 U 4.7 J < 24 U < 20 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 10 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS/NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 150 J 1/84PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (μg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fraction 640000 5/68METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 70200 152/152Antimony 7.16 J 38/151Arsenic 62.9 152/152Barium 1630 152/152Beryllium 4.12 150/152Cadmium 1.6 6/152Calcium 128000 152/152Chromium 97.1 152/152Cobalt 90.1 152/152Copper 126 152/152Iron 74000 152/152Lead 189 152/152Magnesium 4490 152/152Manganese 7100 152/152Mercury 2.06 89/152Nickel 128 152/152Potassium 3320 152/152Selenium 5.1 88/152Silver 1.16 J 2/152Sodium 1020 J 135/152Thallium 19 59/152Vanadium 107 152/152Zinc 1150 152/152Notes:ND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = Estimated0103SB06 0103SB08 0103SD00 0103TR05 0104SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U< 24840 U < 26600 U < 27590 U < 24180 U18700 29600 15900 22500 24 15800< 9.9 UJ < 10.6 UJ < 11 U < 12 U < 9.7 UJ17.9 26.3 16.8 9.32 1.2 11107 189 126 102 1.2 851.1 J 2.1 1.2 J 0.738 1.2 J 0.61 J< 0.99 U 1.4 < 1.1 U < 1.2 U < 0.97 U1580 5170 2120 J 1070 120 170020.3 J 23.7 J 19.8 J 20.3 2.4 21.1 J11.9 J 10.3 J 19.8 10.9 2.4 8.8 J18 27.4 17.8 10.8 2.4 12.335800 45200 32700 20100 24 2290024.2 19.8 32.2 J 14.2 1.2 20.21140 J 1660 1000 J 1730 120 1000 J983 4620 2410 J 522 1.2 240< 0.1 U < 0.11 U 0.12 < 0.12 U < 0.1 U18.7 55 23.9 15.9 2.4 11.5932 J 1500 798 J 1360 601 733 J1.9 < 1.3 U < 1.4 U 0.452 1.2 J < 1.2 U< 2 U < 2.1 U < 2.2 U < 2.4 U < 1.9 U136 J 246 J 655 J 196 120 131 J< 4.3 U < 7.8 U 7.2 < 2.4 U < 3.4 U45.7 58.4 44.4 38.4 2.4 37.8152 272 137 50.1 1.2 80.9Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 11 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyU = NondetectUJ = Estimated NondetectR = RejectedE = Value exceeds linear range.mg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramBlank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample was not analyzed for theseparameters.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1996) with data from the Phase II RFI(2002).Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000 was obtained from theArmy Environmental Center database and therefore do not include RLs for detectedcompounds.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analyte was detected in the samples.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions and reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reported concentration for each analyte.0103SB06 0103SB08 0103SD00 0103TR05 0104SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 January 16, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 12 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 27 9/153Acetone 680 J 55/153Benzene 17 7/153Carbon disulfide 33 12/153Chlorobenzene 52 20/153Ethylbenzene 160 10/153m/p-Xylene 240 13/85Methylene Chloride 24 J 8/153o-Xylene 140 7/85Tetrachloroethylene 9 J 3/153Toluene 58 40/153Xylenes, total 430 J 7/68SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1000 2/1522-Methylnaphthalene 8800 9/152Acenaphthene 3100 9/152Acenaphthylene 460 2/152Anthracene 5300 15/152Benzo[a]anthracene 11000 22/152Benzo[a]pyrene 8900 19/152Benzo[b]fluoranthene 12000 24/152Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 6400 17/152Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4400 13/152Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 390 J 1/152Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 3800 24/152Butylbenzyl phthalate 1500 12/152Carbazole 3300 13/152Chrysene 11000 28/152Di-n-butyl phthalate 4400 29/152Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1400 J 10/152Dibenzofuran 1400 J 8/1520104SB04 0104SB11 0104SD00 0104TR06 0105SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual27 < 13 U < 13 U < 51 U < 12 U94 110 31 < 51 U 220< 12 U 7 J < 13 U 2.4 5.1 J < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U 1.7 5.1 J < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U < 5.1 U < 12 U7 J 160 < 13 U 33 5.1 < 12 U120 5.1< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U < 5.1 U < 12 U58 5.1< 12 U < 13 U < 13 U < 5.1 U < 12 U7 J 15 < 13 U 5.7 5.1 < 12 U31 230 < 13 U < 12 U< 1600 U < 430 U < 430 U < 1600 U < 410 U< 1600 U 240 J < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U 84 J 190 J < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U 34 J < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U220 J 130 J 210 J < 780 U < 410 U6800 320 J 460 < 780 U < 410 U5700 210 J 330 J < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U 370 J 570 J 650 780 J < 410 U1400 J 76 J 210 J < 780 U < 410 U2700 120 J 190 J < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U < 430 U < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U < 1000 U < 430 U < 1600 U 110 J< 1600 U < 430 U < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U 40 J 79 J < 780 U < 410 U11000 250 J 230 J 440 780 J < 410 U< 1600 U < 1000 U < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U300 J 44 J 82 J < 780 U < 410 U< 1600 U 42 J 71 J < 780 U < 410 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 13 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 48 J 1/152Fluoranthene 25000 30/152Fluorene 3300 10/152Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 5200 15/152N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3100 14/152Naphthalene 670 4/152Nitrobenzene 1400 J 1/152Pentachlorophenol 26000 J 6/152Phenanthrene 22000 22/152Phenol 2500 3/152Pyrene 21000 35/152PESTICIDES (ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 19 J 9/1514,4-DDE 50 J 16/1514,4-DDT 20 J 20/151Aldrin 18 J 3/151alpha-Benzenehexachloride 14 7/151alpha-Chlordane 27 J 7/151beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 43 13/151delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 0.38 J 6/151Dieldrin 51 J 19/151Endosulfan I 10 4/151Endosulfan II 5.5 3/151Endosulfan sulfate 13 7/151Endrin 26 J 8/151Endrin aldehyde 16 J 4/151Endrin ketone 24 11/151gamma-Chlordane 6.1 10/151Heptachlor 13 9/151Heptachlor epoxide 64 J 8/151Lindane 6.9 3/151Methoxychlor 170 17/1510104SB04 0104SB11 0104SD00 0104TR06 0105SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 1600 U < 430 U < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U860 J 500 1100 630 780 J < 410 U< 1600 U 130 J 180 J < 780 U < 410 U500 J 130 J 230 J < 780 U < 410 U920 J 280 J < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U290 J 190 J < 430 U < 1600 U < 410 U1400 J < 430 U < 430 U < 1600 U < 410 U560 J < 1000 U < 1000 U < 1600 U < 1000 U830 J 620 940 590 780 J < 410 U2500 < 430 U < 430 U < 780 U < 410 U5400 390 J 760 500 780 J < 410 U< 20 U 0.22 J < 4.3 U < 24 U < 4.1 U27 J < 4.3 U < 4.3 U < 24 U < 4.1 U< 20 U 3.8 J 1.5 J < 24 U < 4.1 UJ< 10 UJ < 2.2 UJ < 2.2 U < 24 U < 2.1 UJ< 10 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 U27 J < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 U< 10 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 24 U < 2.1 UJ< 10 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 U< 20 UJ < 4.3 U 0.35 J < 24 U < 4.1 U< 10 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 U< 20 U < 4.3 U < 4.3 U < 24 U < 4.1 U< 20 U < 4.3 U 0.1 J < 24 U < 4.1 U26 J 0.96 J < 4.3 U < 24 U < 4.1 UJ< 20 U 1.5 J < 4.3 U < 24 U < 4.1 U< 20 U < 4.3 U 0.47 J < 24 U < 4.1 U< 10 U < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 U< 10 UJ < 2.2 UJ < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 UJ2.9 J < 2.2 U < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 U< 10 UJ 0.5 J < 2.2 U < 12 U < 2.1 UJ< 100 U < 22 U 4 J < 120 U < 21 UJQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 14 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS/NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 150 J 1/84PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (μg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fraction 640000 5/68METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 70200 152/152Antimony 7.16 J 38/151Arsenic 62.9 152/152Barium 1630 152/152Beryllium 4.12 150/152Cadmium 1.6 6/152Calcium 128000 152/152Chromium 97.1 152/152Cobalt 90.1 152/152Copper 126 152/152Iron 74000 152/152Lead 189 152/152Magnesium 4490 152/152Manganese 7100 152/152Mercury 2.06 89/152Nickel 128 152/152Potassium 3320 152/152Selenium 5.1 88/152Silver 1.16 J 2/152Sodium 1020 J 135/152Thallium 19 59/152Vanadium 107 152/152Zinc 1150 152/152Notes:ND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = Estimated0104SB04 0104SB11 0104SD00 0104TR06 0105SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U500000 J 310000 < 26010 U < 24880 U16800 14500 11800 20300 23.6 21500< 9.7 UJ < 10.4 UJ < 10.4 U 5.34 11.8 J < 10 UJ10.4 20.1 16.9 7.55 1.18 16.5705 143 175 88.7 1.18 1390.88 J 0.96 J 1 J 0.638 1.18 J 1.1 J< 0.97 U < 1 U < 1 U < 1.18 U < 1 U780 J 10900 3100 J 76500 118 653059.6 J 53.1 J 46.3 J 25.6 2.36 23.6 J11.8 J 22.5 26.3 8.27 2.36 15.514.9 46.5 12.9 22.9 2.36 19.940500 74000 33500 18000 23.6 3240020.7 51.6 47.1 J 36.5 1.18 24.82170 2210 1040 J 3450 118 1680415 1780 2930 J 424 1.18 1660 J0.12 0.17 < 0.11 U 0.0895 0.118 J < 0.1 U18.5 42.7 18 15.1 2.36 27.21250 762 J 657 J 1450 589 1130 J< 1.2 U < 1.3 U < 1.3 U 0.975 1.18 J < 1.2 U< 1.9 U < 2.1 U < 2.1 U < 2.36 U < 2 U221 J 322 J 448 J 609 118 < 124 U< 6.3 U < 12.1 U 7 < 2.36 U 6.230.2 39.5 48.3 38.5 2.36 47.4876 480 93.1 397 1.18 153Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 15 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyU = NondetectUJ = Estimated NondetectR = RejectedE = Value exceeds linear range.mg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramBlank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample was not analyzed for theseparameters.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1996) with data from the Phase II RFI(2002).Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000 was obtained from theArmy Environmental Center database and therefore do not include RLs for detectedcompounds.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analyte was detected in the samples.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions and reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reported concentration for each analyte.0104SB04 0104SB11 0104SD00 0104TR06 0105SB02January 16, 1996 January 16, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 25, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 16 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 27 9/153Acetone 680 J 55/153Benzene 17 7/153Carbon disulfide 33 12/153Chlorobenzene 52 20/153Ethylbenzene 160 10/153m/p-Xylene 240 13/85Methylene Chloride 24 J 8/153o-Xylene 140 7/85Tetrachloroethylene 9 J 3/153Toluene 58 40/153Xylenes, total 430 J 7/68SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1000 2/1522-Methylnaphthalene 8800 9/152Acenaphthene 3100 9/152Acenaphthylene 460 2/152Anthracene 5300 15/152Benzo[a]anthracene 11000 22/152Benzo[a]pyrene 8900 19/152Benzo[b]fluoranthene 12000 24/152Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 6400 17/152Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4400 13/152Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 390 J 1/152Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 3800 24/152Butylbenzyl phthalate 1500 12/152Carbazole 3300 13/152Chrysene 11000 28/152Di-n-butyl phthalate 4400 29/152Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1400 J 10/152Dibenzofuran 1400 J 8/1520105SB04 0105SB08 0105SD00 0105TR05 0106SB02February 13, 1996 February 13, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 26, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 71 U < 12 U5 J < 12 U 52 < 71 U 19< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 7.1 U < 12 U< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 7.1 U < 12 U1 J < 12 U < 14 U < 7.1 U < 12 U< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 7.1 U < 12 U3 7.1 J< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 7.1 U < 12 U< 7.1 U< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 7.1 U < 12 U< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U 2 7.1 J < 12 U< 13 U < 12 U < 14 U < 12 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 950 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U98 J 99 J < 450 UJ < 950 U 110 J< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U 230 J < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 2300 U < 2000 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 1500 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 17 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 48 J 1/152Fluoranthene 25000 30/152Fluorene 3300 10/152Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 5200 15/152N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3100 14/152Naphthalene 670 4/152Nitrobenzene 1400 J 1/152Pentachlorophenol 26000 J 6/152Phenanthrene 22000 22/152Phenol 2500 3/152Pyrene 21000 35/152PESTICIDES (ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 19 J 9/1514,4-DDE 50 J 16/1514,4-DDT 20 J 20/151Aldrin 18 J 3/151alpha-Benzenehexachloride 14 7/151alpha-Chlordane 27 J 7/151beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 43 13/151delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 0.38 J 6/151Dieldrin 51 J 19/151Endosulfan I 10 4/151Endosulfan II 5.5 3/151Endosulfan sulfate 13 7/151Endrin 26 J 8/151Endrin aldehyde 16 J 4/151Endrin ketone 24 11/151gamma-Chlordane 6.1 10/151Heptachlor 13 9/151Heptachlor epoxide 64 J 8/151Lindane 6.9 3/151Methoxychlor 170 17/1510105SB04 0105SB08 0105SD00 0105TR05 0106SB02February 13, 1996 February 13, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 26, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U 520 < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 950 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 950 U < 400 U< 1000 U < 990 U < 1100 UJ < 950 U < 960 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U< 420 U < 410 U < 450 UJ < 480 U < 400 U4.9 < 4.1 U < 4.5 U < 5.8 U 2 J< 4.2 U < 4.1 U < 4.5 U < 5.8 U < 4 U< 4.2 UJ < 4.1 UJ 0.97 J < 5.8 U < 4 UJ< 2.2 UJ < 2.1 UJ < 2.3 U < 5.8 U < 2 UJ< 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 U< 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 U< 2.2 UJ < 2.1 UJ < 2.3 U < 5.8 U < 2 UJ< 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 U< 4.2 U < 4.1 U 0.22 J < 5.8 U < 4 U< 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 U< 4.2 U < 4.1 U < 4.5 U < 5.8 U < 4 U< 4.2 U < 4.1 U < 4.5 U < 5.8 U < 4 U< 4.2 UJ < 4.1 UJ < 4.5 U < 5.8 U < 4 UJ< 4.2 U < 4.1 U < 4.5 U < 5.8 U < 4 U< 4.2 U < 4.1 U < 4.5 U < 5.8 U < 4 U< 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 U< 2.2 UJ < 2.1 UJ < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 UJ< 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 U< 2.2 UJ < 2.1 UJ < 2.3 U < 2.9 U < 2 UJ< 22 UJ < 21 UJ 9.8 J < 29 U < 20 UJQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 18 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyNITROAROMATICS/NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 150 J 1/84PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (μg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fraction 640000 5/68METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 70200 152/152Antimony 7.16 J 38/151Arsenic 62.9 152/152Barium 1630 152/152Beryllium 4.12 150/152Cadmium 1.6 6/152Calcium 128000 152/152Chromium 97.1 152/152Cobalt 90.1 152/152Copper 126 152/152Iron 74000 152/152Lead 189 152/152Magnesium 4490 152/152Manganese 7100 152/152Mercury 2.06 89/152Nickel 128 152/152Potassium 3320 152/152Selenium 5.1 88/152Silver 1.16 J 2/152Sodium 1020 J 135/152Thallium 19 59/152Vanadium 107 152/152Zinc 1150 152/152Notes:ND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = Estimated0105SB04 0105SB08 0105SD00 0105TR05 0106SB02February 13, 1996 February 13, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 26, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 400 U< 25610 U < 24630 U < 27290 U 6000020600 17800 18000 70200 28.9 21000< 10.2 UJ < 9.9 UJ < 10.9 U 5.5 14.5 J < 9.7 UJ10.6 13.1 13.6 19.9 1.45 20.6208 146 123 188 1.45 1200.89 J 0.81 J 1.1 J 2.29 1.45 1.3< 1 U < 0.99 U < 1.1 U < 1.45 U < 0.97 U2660 1760 2720 J 21200 145 617029 J 18.2 J 29.1 J 59.8 2.89 31.4 J21.6 24.1 14.5 13.2 2.89 17.917.5 17.4 16.7 31.9 2.89 19.932300 30000 30300 47300 28.9 3600023.1 33 24.4 J 19.8 1.45 231680 1440 1440 4310 145 13902440 J 2870 J 1910 J 1420 1.45 1690 J< 0.11 U < 0.1 U < 0.11 U 0.132 0.145 J < 0.1 U16.6 18.3 17.3 55.2 2.89 27.61070 J 992 J 959 J 2850 723 1030 J< 1.3 U < 1.2 U < 1.4 U 0.627 1.45 J < 1.2 U< 2 U < 2 U < 2.2 U < 2.89 U < 1.9 U< 128 U 154 J 481 J 236 145 122 J6.4 5.5 7.6 < 2.89 U 7.349.8 44.5 47.9 107 2.89 50.2109 118 78.7 421 1.45 152Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 19 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyU = NondetectUJ = Estimated NondetectR = RejectedE = Value exceeds linear range.mg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramBlank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample was not analyzed for theseparameters.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1996) with data from the Phase II RFI(2002).Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000 was obtained from theArmy Environmental Center database and therefore do not include RLs for detectedcompounds.Frequency indicates the number of times a given analyte was detected in the samples.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions and reanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reported concentration for each analyte.0105SB04 0105SB08 0105SD00 0105TR05 0106SB02February 13, 1996 February 13, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 26, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 20 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 27 9/153Acetone 680 J 55/153Benzene 17 7/153Carbon disulfide 33 12/153Chlorobenzene 52 20/153Ethylbenzene 160 10/153m/p-Xylene 240 13/85Methylene Chloride 24 J 8/153o-Xylene 140 7/85Tetrachloroethylene 9 J 3/153Toluene 58 40/153Xylenes, total 430 J 7/68SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (μg/kg)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1000 2/1522-Methylnaphthalene 8800 9/152Acenaphthene 3100 9/152Acenaphthylene 460 2/152Anthracene 5300 15/152Benzo[a]anthracene 11000 22/152Benzo[a]pyrene 8900 19/152Benzo[b]fluoranthene 12000 24/152Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 6400 17/152Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4400 13/152Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 390 J 1/152Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 3800 24/152Butylbenzyl phthalate 1500 12/152Carbazole 3300 13/152Chrysene 11000 28/152Di-n-butyl phthalate 4400 29/152Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1400 J 10/152Dibenzofuran 1400 J 8/1520106SB06 0106SB10 0106SD00 0106TR07 0107SB02February 13, 1996 February 13, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 26, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 65 U < 12 U24 41 21 < 65 U 20< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 6.5 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U 2.3 6.5 J < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U 27 6.5 < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 6.5 U < 12 U< 6.5 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 6.5 U < 12 U< 6.5 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 6.5 U < 12 U1 J < 13 U < 14 U < 6.5 U < 12 U< 12 U < 13 U < 14 U < 12 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 920 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 210 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 170 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 280 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 89 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 120 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U130 J 130 J < 450 U < 920 U 82 J< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 60 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 100 J < 460 U < 400 U< 2600 U < 3500 U < 450 U 280 460 J < 730 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 01\Draft\Site 01 Tables_Rev0.XLS Page 21 of 124 7/14/2004TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 1 - OLD LANDFILLFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyDiethyl phthalate 48 J 1/152Fluoranthene 25000 30/152Fluorene 3300 10/152Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 5200 15/152N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 3100 14/152Naphthalene 670 4/152Nitrobenzene 1400 J 1/152Pentachlorophenol 26000 J 6/152Phenanthrene 22000 22/152Phenol 2500 3/152Pyrene 21000 35/152PESTICIDES (ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 19 J 9/1514,4-DDE 50 J 16/1514,4-DDT 20 J 20/151Aldrin 18 J 3/151alpha-Benzenehexachloride 14 7/151alpha-Chlordane 27 J 7/151beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 43 13/151delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 0.38 J 6/151Dieldrin 51 J 19/151Endosulfan I 10 4/151Endosulfan II 5.5 3/151Endosulfan sulfate 13 7/151Endrin 26 J 8/151Endrin aldehyde 16 J 4/151Endrin ketone 24 11/151gamma-Chlordane 6.1 10/151Heptachlor 13 9/151Heptachlor epoxide 64 J 8/151Lindane 6.9 3/151Methoxychlor 170 17/1510106SB06 0106SB10 0106SD00 0106TR07 0107SB02February 13, 1996 February 13, 1996 January 25, 1996 September 26, 2002 February 13, 1996Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 390 J 260 460 J < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 84 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U 250 J < 460 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < 920 U < 400 U< 410 U < 430 U < 450 U < |
|---|---|
| Origin: | 2004-07-16 |
| Source: |
http://indianamemory.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15078coll17/id/33762 |
| Collection: |
Clark County Collections |
| Rights: | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/ |
| Copyright: |
Charlestown-Clark County Public Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes and makes no warranty with regard to their use for other purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and/or holders of other rights such as publicity and/or privacy rights is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. There may be content that is protected as works for hire copyright held by the party that commissioned the original work and/or under the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item. |
| Geography: |
Charlestown, Clark County, Indiana 38.4357546,-85.6577676 |
| Subjects: |
Maps Indiana Ordnance Works (U.S.) Hoosier Ordnance Plant Indiana Arsenal Indiana Army Ammunition Plant Explosives Industry--Indiana Gunpowder, Smokeless Ordnance manufacture Black powder manufacture Facility One ICI Americas Inc Clark County (Ind.) Charlestown (Ind.) United States. Army Ordnance and Ordnance Stores INAAP |
Further information on this record can be found at its source.
This project is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services, administered by the Indiana State Library.