INAAP Jenny Lind pond site 25 phase II RCRA facility investigation report Oct 2002

Description:	The revised final report for Jenny Lind pond site 25 at Indiana Army Ammunition Plant of Phase II RCRA facility investigation prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in October 2002.The United States federal government began acquiring land in Charlestown, Indiana in 1940 to build a smokeless powder ordnance plant to supply the US military during World War II. Indiana Ordnance Works (IOW) Plant 1 and Hoosier Ordnance Plant (HOP) began production in 1941. In 1944, IOW Plant 2 construction began. On 30 Nov 1945 at the end of WWII, the three plants were combined and renamed Indiana Arsenal. Between 1 Nov 1961 and 1 Aug 1963, the plant was designated Indiana Ordnance Plant. After this time, it became Indiana Army Ammunition Plant (INAAP). Production of ordnance continued at the plant until 1992. After that time, the land and facilities were leased to private industry. A large portion of the land became Charlestown State Park. In October 2016, all the land and facilities were officially sold by the government. This item is part of a larger collection of items from INAAP that are kept at Charlestown Library. R E V I S E D F I N A L R E P O R TJENNY LIND POND – SITE 25INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTPHASE II RCRA FACILITY INVESTIGATIONPrepared forU.S. Army Corps of EngineersLouisville DistrictOctober 2002Prepared by12120 Shamrock Plaza, Suite 300Omaha, Nebraska 68154TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev2 (revised final).doc\5-Sep-02 /OMA iExecutive Summary ..........................................................................................................................ES-1Section 1 Site Location and Description....................................................................................... 1-11.1 Operational History and Waste Characteristics ....................................... 1-21.2 Previous Investigations ............................................................................ 1-31.3 Report Organization................................................................................. 1-4Section 2 Field Activities Summary .............................................................................................. 2-12.1 Geophysical Survey ................................................................................. 2-12.2 Soil and Sediment Sampling.................................................................... 2-12.2.1 Soil ............................................................................................... 2-12.2.2 Sediment ...................................................................................... 2-22.3 Water Sampling ....................................................................................... 2-32.3.1 Surface Water Sampling .............................................................. 2-32.3.2 Direct Push Groundwater Sampling ............................................ 2-42.3.3 Monitoring Well Sampling .......................................................... 2-52.4 Field Screening Results............................................................................ 2-52.5 IDW Disposition ...................................................................................... 2-5Section 3 Physical Investigation Results ..................................................................................... 3-13.1 Topogrpahy and Surface Features ........................................................... 3-13.2 Local Surficial Geology........................................................................... 3-23.2.1 Geophysical Survey Results ........................................................ 3-23.2.2 Soil Borings and Geotechnical Analysis...................................... 3-43.3 Shallow Hydrogeology ............................................................................ 3-5Section 4 Data Quality Review and Validation ............................................................................. 4-14.1 Phase I RI................................................................................................. 4-14.2 Phase II RFI ............................................................................................. 4-1Section 5 Chemical Investigation Results .................................................................................... 5-1Section 6 Contamination Assessment.......................................................................................... 6-16.1 Potential Sources of Contamination from Historical ManufacturingProcesses .................................................................................................. 6-1TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev2 (revised final).doc\5-Sep-02 /OMA ii6.1.1 Production of Diphenylamine and Dimethylamine ..................... 6-16.1.2 Production of Nitrocellulose and Smokeless Powder.................. 6-26.2 Near Surface Soils and Sediments ........................................................... 6-36.2.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-36.2.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-36.2.3 Pesticides/PCBs ........................................................................... 6-46.2.4 Nitroaromatics/Nitramines........................................................... 6-46.2.5 Metals and Cyanide...................................................................... 6-46.3 Subsurface Soils....................................................................................... 6-56.3.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-56.3.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-56.3.3 Pesticides...................................................................................... 6-56.3.4 Metals........................................................................................... 6-56.4 Surface Water........................................................................................... 6-66.4.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-66.4.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-66.4.3 Pesticides...................................................................................... 6-66.4.4 Metals........................................................................................... 6-76.5 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 6-76.5.1 VOCs............................................................................................ 6-76.5.2 SVOCs ......................................................................................... 6-86.5.3 Pesticides...................................................................................... 6-86.5.4 Metals........................................................................................... 6-8Section 7 Human Health Risk Evaluation ..................................................................................... 7-17.1 Introduction.............................................................................................. 7-17.1.1 Purpose......................................................................................... 7-17.2 Risk Screening Process ............................................................................ 7-27.2.1 Identification of Contaminants of Potential Concern(COPCs)....................................................................................... 7-27.3 Exposure Assessment............................................................................... 7-37.3.1 Exposure Point Concentrations.................................................... 7-4TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev2 (revised final).doc\5-Sep-02 /OMA iii7.3.1.1 95% Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) ........................... 7-47.3.1.2 Deer Tissue Concentration............................................ 7-57.3.2 Receptors...................................................................................... 7-67.3.3 Exposure Pathways ...................................................................... 7-77.3.4 Exposure Assumptions ................................................................ 7-87.4 Toxicity Assessment .............................................................................. 7-117.4.1 Toxicity Assessment of Noncarcinogenic Effects ..................... 7-127.4.2 Toxicity Assessment of Carcinogenic Effects ........................... 7-137.4.3 Source of the Critical Toxicity Values....................................... 7-157.5 Risk Characterization............................................................................. 7-157.5.1 Qualitative Assessment of Exposure to Lead ............................ 7-187.5.2 Qualitative Assessment of Exposure to TPH............................. 7-197.6 Uncertainty Analysis.............................................................................. 7-197.6.1 Data Collection and Evaluation ................................................. 7-207.6.1.1 Data Collection ........................................................... 7-207.6.1.2 Data Evaluation........................................................... 7-207.6.1.3 Exposure Point Concentrations................................... 7-217.6.2 Exposure Assessment................................................................. 7-217.6.3 Toxicity Assessment .................................................................. 7-227.6.4 Risk Characterization................................................................. 7-237.7 Summary and Recommendations .......................................................... 7-23Section 8 Ecological Risk Evaluation ........................................................................................... 8-18.1 Introduction.............................................................................................. 8-18.1.1 Purpose......................................................................................... 8-28.1.2 Background.................................................................................. 8-28.1.3 Technical Approach ..................................................................... 8-38.2 Screening Level Ecological Risk Screen ................................................. 8-48.2.1 Habitat Assessment and Applicable Media ................................. 8-48.2.2 Identification of Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern(COPECs) .................................................................................... 8-4TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev2 (revised final).doc\5-Sep-02 /OMA iv8.2.2.1 Environmental Screening Values for Surface Water andChemicals of Potential Ecological Concern ................................ 8-78.2.2.2 Environmental Screening Values for Sediment-Associated Organisms and Chemicals of Potential EcologicalConcern ....................................................................................... 8-98.2.2.3 Environmental Screening Values for Soil-AssociatedOrganisms and Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern ..... 8-108.2.2.4 Environmental Screening Values for Higher Vertebratesand Chemicals of Potential ecological Concern ........................ 8-118.3 Tier II Ecological Risk Assessment....................................................... 8-168.3.1 Problem Formulation ................................................................. 8-168.3.1.1 Relevant Ecological Issues and Environmental Setting8-178.3.1.2 Summary and Assessment Endpoints ......................... 8-238.3.1.3 Exposure Assessment.................................................. 8-248.3.1.4 Toxicity (Effects) Assessment .................................... 8-298.3.2 Analysis Plan ............................................................................. 8-338.3.2.1 Measurement Endpoints and Receptors of Concern... 8-338.3.2.2 Toxicity Reference Values for Risk Characterization 8-448.4 Risk Characterization............................................................................. 8-468.4.1 Primary Producers and Assessment Endpoint Number One...... 8-488.4.2 Decomposers and Detritivores - Assessment EndpointNumber Two .............................................................................. 8-488.4.3 Water Column Invertebrates and Aquatic Vertebrates -Assessment Endpoint Number Three and MeasurementEndpoints 1 and 2....................................................................... 8-498.4.4 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic Herbivores – AssessmentEndpoint Number 3 and Measurement Endpoints 3 and 4 ........ 8-508.4.5 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic Omnivores and AssessmentEndpoint Number 4.................................................................... 8-508.4.6 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic First-Order Carnivores andAssessment Endpoint Number 5................................................ 8-518.4.7 Terrestrial and Semiaquatic 2nd Order Carnivores andAssessment Endpoint Number 6................................................ 8-528.4.8 Cave Resources - Assessment Endpoint Number 7................... 8-528.4.9 Risk Characterization Summary and EcologicalSignificance................................................................................ 8-528.5 Uncertainty Analysis.............................................................................. 8-55TABLE OF CONTENTSSection PageQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev2 (revised final).doc\5-Sep-02 /OMA vSection 9 Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................ 9-19.1 Summary.................................................................................................. 9-19.1.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................... 9-19.1.2 Contamination Assessment.......................................................... 9-29.1.2.1 Near Surface Soil and Sediment ................................... 9-29.1.2.2 Subsurface Soil Samples............................................... 9-29.1.2.3 Surface Water Samples ................................................. 9-29.1.2.4 Groundwater Samples................................................... 9-29.1.3 Human Health Risk Screen/Assessment...................................... 9-29.1.3.1 Soil/Sediment................................................................ 9-39.1.3.2 Groundwater/Surface Water ......................................... 9-39.1.4 Ecological Risk Screen / Assessment .......................................... 9-39.2 Recommendations.................................................................................... 9-4Section 10 References.................................................................................................................... 10-1TABLE OF CONTENTSList of TablesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA viTable 2-1 Summary of Phase I RI Samples for Chemical AnalysisTable 2-2 Summary of Phase II RFI Samples for Chemical AnalysisTable 2-3 Summary of Field Screening For Organic Vapors in SoilTable 5-1 Summary of Chemicals Detected in Soil and Sediment SamplesTable 5-2 Summary of Chemicals Detected in Surface Water and GroundwaterSamplesTable 7-1 Comparison of Total Soil/Sediment Concentrations (All Depths) toScreening LevelsTable 7-2 Comparison of Maximum Surface Soil and Sediment Concentrations toScreening LevelsTable 7-3 Comparison of Surface Water and Groundwater Concentrations toScreening LevelsTable 7-4 Total Soil/Sediment Exposure Point ConcentrationTable 7-5 Surface Soil/Sediment Exposure Point ConcentrationsTable 7-6 Deer Tissue ConcentrationsTable 7-7 Parameters Used To Evaluate Potential Exposure Human Health RiskAssessmentTable 7-8 Critical Toxicity Values for Chemicals of Potential ConcernTable 7-9 USEPA Weight-Of-Evidence Carcinogenic Classification of ChemicalsTable 7-10 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and Carcinogenic RisksAssociated with Total Soil/Sediment – Excavation WorkerTable 7-11 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and Carcinogenic RisksAssociated with Surface Soil/Sediment – Site WorkerTable 7-12 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and Carcinogenic RisksAssociated with Surface Soil/Sediment and Game Ingestion – HunterTable 7-13 Summary of Non-Carcinogenic Health Hazards and CarcinogenicRisks Associated with Total Soil/Sediment – Child RecreatorTable 8-1 Comparison of Maximum Surface Water Concentrations to EcologicalScreening Values (ESVs)Table 8-2 Comparisons of Maximum Sediment Concentrations to EcologicalScreening Values (ESVs)Table 8-3 Comparison of Maximum Soil Concentrations to Ecological ScreeningValues (ESVs)TABLE OF CONTENTSList of TablesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA viiTable 8-4 Comparison of Potential Dietary (Foodweb) Concentrations Based onMaximum Water/Soil/Sediment Concentrations to Ecological ScreeningValuesTable 8-5 Comparison of Predicted Air Concentrations within Caves Based onMaximum Surface Water Concentrations to Ecological Screening ValuesTable 8-6 Chemicals Selected As Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern forDirect Ecological ExposuresTable 8-7 Chemicals Selected As Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern forIndirect (Food Web) ExposuresTable 8-8 Summary of Chemicals of Potential Ecological Concern and MeasurementEndpoints for the Ecological Risk AssessmentTable 8-9 Physical and Behavioral Characteristics of Representative Species Used asReceptors of ConcernTable 8-10 Assumed Dietary Compositions for the Representative Receptors ofConcern (ROCs)Table 8-11 Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) for Direct Exposure to Chemicals ofPotential Ecological Concern in WaterTable 8-12 Toxicity Reference Values for Direct Exposure to Chemicals of PotentialEcological Concern in SedimentTable 8-13 Toxicity Reference Values for Direct Exposures to Chemicals of PotentialEcological Concern in SoilTable 8-14 Oral Toxicity Reference Values Selected for Indirect Exposures (Foodweb)to Chemicals of Potential Ecological ConcernTable 8-15 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Terrestrial Plants - AssessmentEndpoint #1 - Measurement Endpoints #1 & 2Table 8-16 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Algae and Aquatic PlantsAssessment Endpoint #1 - Measurement Endpoints # 3 & 4Table 8-17 Ecological Hazard Quotients Results for Soil Microbial Activity andInvertebrate Detritivores Assessment Endpoint #2 - Measurement Endpoints# 1 & 2Table 8-18 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Sediment Invertebrate DetritivoresAssessment Endpoint #2 - Measurement Endpoints #3, 4, 5, 6 & 7Table 8-19 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Aquatic (Water Column)Invertebrates and Vertebrates (Fish and Amphibians) - AssessmentEndpoint #3 - Measurement Endpoints #1 & 2Table 8-20 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Representative HerbivoresAssessment Endpoint #3 - Measurement Endpoints #3 & 4TABLE OF CONTENTSList of TablesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA viiiTable 8-21 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Representative OmnivoresAssessment Endpoint #4 - Measurement Endpoints #1, 2, & 3Table 8-22 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Representative First-OrderCarnivores Assessment Endpoint #5 – Measurement Endpoints #1 & 2Table 8-23 Ecological Hazard Quotient Results for Representative Top CarnivoresAssessment Endpoint #6 - Measurement Endpoints #1 & 2TABLE OF CONTENTSList of FiguresQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA ixFigure 1-1 Site Location MapFigure 1-2 Site Features MapFigure 2-1 Sample Location MapFigure 3-1 Electrical Resistivity Transect 1Figure 3-2 Electrical Resistivity Transect 2Figure 3-3 Electrical Resistivity Transect 3Figure 3-4 Electrical Resistivity Transect 4Figure 3-5 Electrical Resistivity Transect 5Figure 3-6 Electrical Resistivity Transect 6Figure 3-7 Electrical Resistivity Transect 7Figure 3-8 Electrical Resistivity Transect 8Figure 3-9 Boring LogsFigure 3-10 Cross SectionsFigure 3-11 Cross SectionsFigure 6-1 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in SoilFigure 6-2 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in SedimentFigure 6-3 Concentrations of Chemicals Detected in Surface Water andGroundwaterFigure 8-1 Ecological Evaluation ProcessFigure 8-2 Conceptual Ecological Exposure (Direct & Foodweb) ModelFigure 9-1 Human Health COPCs and Ecological COPECs Detected in Soil,Sediment, Surface Water and GroundwaterTABLE OF CONTENTSList of AppendicesQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xAppendix A Data Quality Review and ValidationAppendix B Human Health Risk Statistics and CalculationsAppendix C Ecological Risk Statistics and CalculationsAppendix D Daily Quality Control ReportsAppendix E Boring and Trench Logs; Monitoring Well Construction Diagrams, WellDevelopment Logs and Topographic Survey DataAppendix F Geotechnical DataAppendix G Sample Collection Field SheetsAppendix H Summary of Analytical DataNote: Information contained in the Appendixes is included in CD-ROM format. The CD-ROMmay be found at the back of this binder.TABLE OF CONTENTSAcronym ListQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xiACHe AcetylcholinesteraseADI Acceptable Daily IntakeADNTs Amino-dinitrotoluenesATP Adenosine TriphosphateAE Assessment EndpointAEC U.S. Army Environmental CenterAET Apparent Effect LevelsALAD Alpha-aminolevulinic Acid DehydrogeuaseAPCB Jefferson County Air Pollution Control BoardAQUIRE Aquatic Information Retrieval System.AST Aboveground Storage TankASTER Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of RiskATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registrybgs Below Ground SurfaceBA BioavailabilityBCFs Bioconcentration FactorsBRAC Base Re-Alignment and ClosureBSAFs Biota-Sediment Accumulation FactorsBTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, XylenesBTFs Biota Transfer FactorsBtu British Thermal UnitBW Body WeightCERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability ActCDI Chronic Daily IntakeCLP Contract Laboratory ProgramCMS Corrective Measures StudyCOC Chemicals of ConcernCOI Chemical of InterestCOPC Chemicals of Potential ConcernCOPEC Chemicals of Potential Ecological ConcernCRDL Contract Required Detection LimitCRQL Contract Required Quantitation LimitsTABLE OF CONTENTSAcronym ListQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xiiCSP Charlestown State ParkCTE Central Tendency ExposureCTV Critical Toxicity ValueDAF Dilution Attenuation FactorDBT Dibutyl phthalateDDD dichlorodiphenyldiehlorethaneDDE 4, 4 DDEDDT 1, 1’ (2,2,2-Trichloroethylidene)bis[4-chlorobenzene]DERP Defense Environmental Restoration ProgramDNA Deoxyribonucleic acidDOD Department of DefenseDQCR Data Quality Control ReportsDQO Data Quality ObjectivesDS Direct Push SoilDW Direct Push WaterEECs Environmental Exposure ConcentrationsEEQ Environment Exposure QuotientEM ElectromagneticEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyEPC Exposure Point ConcentrationEQP Equilibrium-PartitioningERA Ecological Risk AssessmentERAGs Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for SuperfundERL Effects – Range - LowERM Effects – Range – MediumERT Emergency Response TeamESV Ecological Screening ValueFC Fraction IngestedFSP Field Sampling PlanGABA Gamma-aminobutyric AcidGOCO Government-Owned, Contractor-Operatedgpm gallons per minuteTABLE OF CONTENTSAcronym ListQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xiiiGPR Ground Penetrating RadarHEAST Health Effects Assessment Summary TablesHHRA Human Health Risk AssessmentHI Hazard IndexHLSC Human Life Cycle Safe ConcentrationHMW High Molecular WeightHOP Hoosier Ordnance PlantHQ Hazard QuotientHSA hollow-stem augerHSDB Hazardous Substance DatabaseICI ICI Americas, Inc.ID inner diameterIDEM Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementIDL Instrument Detection LimitIDNR Indiana Department Natural ResourcesIEUBK Integrated Exposure Uptake BiokineticINAAP Indiana Army Ammunition PlantIOW Indiana Ordnance Works Plant 1IRIS Integrated Risk Information SystemIWPCB Indiana Water Pollution Control BoardIWQC Indiana Water Quality CriteriaIOWP Indiana Ordnance Works Plant 2J/UJ Qualified EstimatedKg KilogramL/day Liter per dayLAP Load, Assemble, and PackLC LeachateLMW Low Molecular WeightLOAEL Lowest to Observed Adverse Effects LevelLOEC Lowest Observation Effect concentrationsLOQ Limits of QuantitationMATC Maximum Acceptable Toxicant ConcentrationTABLE OF CONTENTSAcronym ListQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xivMCL Maximum Contaminant LevelME Measurement Endpointmg/day milligrams per daymg/kg milligram per kilogrammg/m3 milligram per cubic meterMS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike DuplicateMSL Mean Sea LevelMW Monitoring WellNCEA National Center for Environmental AssessmentNOAEL No Observable Adverse Effects LevelNOD Notice of DeficiencyNPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemOD outside diameterORNL Oak Ridge National LaboratoryP&E Propellants and ExplosivesPA Preliminary AssessmentPAH Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonPCB Polychlorinated BiphenylPEL Probable – Effects – LevelPpm parts per millionPRG Preliminary Remediation GoalsPVC Polyvinyl ChlorideQA Quality AssuranceQAPP Quality Assurance Project PlanQC Quality Control“R” RejectedRAGS Risk Assessment Guidance for SuperfundRBC Risk-Based ConcentrationRCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery ActRDA Recommended Daily AllowanceRfD Reference DoseRFD-I Reference Inhalation DoseTABLE OF CONTENTSAcronym ListQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xvRFI RCRA Facility InvestigationRI Remedial InvestigationRISC Risk Integrated System of ClosureRME Recommended Maximum ExposureRNA Ribonucleic acidROC Receptor of ConcernSAP Sampling and Analysis PlanSARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization ActSB Soil BoringSCEM Site Conceptual Exposure ModelSCFS Sample Collection Field SheetsSD SedimentSF-SH Slope Factor-Sulfhydryl ligandsSOP Standard Operating ProcedureSP SpringSS Shallow SoilSVOC Semivolatile Organic ChemicalsSW Surface WaterSWQC Surface Water Quality CriteriaTAL Target Analyte ListTCL Target Compound ListTCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureTDS Total Dissolved SolidsTEL Threshold – Effects – LevelTNT TrinitrotouleneToxNet Toxicity Data NetworkTPH Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsTRV Toxicity Reference ValueTSS Total Suspended Solids“U” Qualified Nondetectμg/kg microgram per kilogramμg/L microgram per LiterTABLE OF CONTENTSAcronym ListQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA xviμg/m3 microgram per cubic meterUCL Upper Confidence LimitURSGWC URS Greiner Woodward ClydeUSACE U.S. Army Corps of EngineersUSATHAMA U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials AgencyUSCS Unified Soil Classification SystemUSDA U.S. Department of AgricultureUSEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSGS U.S. Geologic SurveyUST Underground Storage TankUTL Upper Tolerance LimitVOC Volatile Organic ChemicalsW-C Woodward-ClydeExecutive Summary Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA ES-1The following includes the results of the Phase II RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) completedfor the former Jenny Lind Pond (Site 25) at the Indiana Army Ammunition Plant (INAAP). Thereport also summarizes the results of the previously completed Phase I Remedial Investigation(RI).INAAP currently encompasses approximately 9,790 acres in south-central Clark County,Indiana. Its southern boundary is approximately 6 miles north of Jeffersonville, Indiana and 10miles from the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan area, which lies to the south across the OhioRiver. INAAP is a Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated, inactive military industrialinstallation. The Army intends to transfer the property to the Local Reuse Authority forcommercial development with portions going to the State of Indiana for inclusion in the statepark system. The former Jenny Lind Pond is one of 90 sites identified at INAAP.The Plant was originally constructed as three separate facilities: The Indiana Ordnance WorksPlant 1, the Hoosier Ordnance Plant, and the Indiana Works Plant 2. The three facilities wereconsolidated into the Indiana Arsenal in 1945. The Indiana Arsenal was redesignated as theIndiana Ordnance Plant in 1961; in August 1963, it was redesignated again as the Indiana ArmyAmmunition Plant.Topography at the INAAP can be described as a middle-aged karst topography. Karsttopography is produced by the dissolution of limestone, gypsum, or other readily soluble rocks,commonly along joints, fractures, bedding planes, or other such features. The dissolutionprocess results in the formation of sinkholes, caves, and underground drainage. Numeroussinkholes and springs are found throughout much of INAAP.Approximately 96 percent of INAAP’s land surface drains directly into the Ohio River via sevendrainage basins. The remaining 4 percent reaching the Ohio River indirectly through thePleasant Run basin.Groundwater at INAAP is present in the bedrock formations of the upland areas and in theterrace/floodplain sand and gravel deposits located within the Ohio River valley. Thegroundwater present in the floodplain aquifer along the Ohio River is a major water supplysource. Groundwater is not usually found in the thin soil layer covering the bedrock surface inthe upland areas. When present, shallow groundwater typically mingles with surface water byflowing in and out of karst features.The Phase I and II investigations at Site 25 included the completion of 14 soil borings, theinstallation of four monitoring wells, the collection of and analysis 60 surface and subsurface soilsamples, 39 collocated surface water/sediment samples, one additional sediment sample, and 15groundwater samples. Chemical analysis included VOCs, SVOCs, metals,nitroaromatics/nitramines, pesticides/PCBs, TOC, various wet chemistry parameters andgeotechnical analyses.Jenny Lind Pond was an 8.9-acre retention basin located along Jenny Lind Run downstream ofthe Process Waste Settling Basin (Site 6). The watershed of Jenny Lind Pond includes all or partof 32 sites that were addressed in the Phase I RI. The pond was built in the late 1950s to retainindustrial wastewater before discharge to the Ohio River and has received P&E Area effluent.Executive Summary Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA ES-2The pond was renovated and restocked with fish in 1981. Previous investigations have detectedorganic compounds and metals in sediment and surface water. A 1995 risk analysis determinedthat catch and release fishing posed no threat to users of Jenny Lind Pond; however, childrenshould not consume any fish from the pond.Jenny Lind Pond is located about one-half mile upstream of the point where Jenny Lind Rundischarges into the Ohio River. The earthen dam at the southeastern end of the pond had bothprincipal and emergency spillways. A boat ramp is located along the north edge of the formerpond just upstream of the dam. The surrounding area slopes steeply toward the pond and iscovered with woodlands. The discharge area below the dam along Jenny Lind Run is known toexperience flooding during periods of elevated water levels in the Ohio River. In spring of 1997,the dam was breached by catastrophic failure due to heavy precipitation runoff and subsequentflooding. The pond drained and today is empty with small streams running through it.The shallow stratigraphy at Site 25 consists of a thin layer of process sediments overlying a thickalluvial deposit of silt and clay. Most of the alluvial deposit is Ohio River sediments. Alluvialdeposits of sand and gravel from Jenny Lind Run, were identified in borings 25SB01, 25SB05,and 25SB12. In most soil borings, refusal occurred in this alluvial silt and clay deposit.Residual clay soils were only identified in one boring (25SB05) and bedrock was only identifiedin one boring (25SB12).Groundwater was encountered in all 12 direct push borings and the two groundwater monitoringwell borings completed in the area of the former pond basin. At the time of drilling,groundwater was generally encountered at depths ranging from approximately three to six feetbgs in all borings located within the basin except those that were drilled at slightly higherelevations around the edges of the basin. Shallow groundwater was measured at approximatelyone-foot bgs in wells 25MW03 and 25MW04, at the time of sampling. The two streams, whichexit each branch of the former pond, have most likely lowered the shallow water table within thebasin as their channels incised into the pond bed.A contamination assessment was completed for near surface soil and sediment, subsurface soil,surface water, and groundwater. Elevated levels of three SVOCs and onenitroaromatic/nitramine compound were detected in near surface soil and sediment samples.Elevated levels of target compounds were not detected in subsurface soil, surface water andgroundwater samples. Several metals results exceeded background concentrations for all mediasampled.Future land use may include transfer of the property to the Indiana Department of NaturalResources. Therefore, a human health risk assessment evaluated the on-site worker, excavationworker, hunter, and child recreator scenarios. The results indicate that the potential primarycarcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk drivers are ingestion of 2,4-dinitrotoluene and 2,6-dinitrotoluene from soil. The cancer risks ranged from 2 x 10-9 to 1 x 10-7 for the RecommendedMaximum Exposure (RME) and 3 x 10-10 to 2 x 10-8 for Central Tendency Exposure (CTE).Hazard indices ranged from 0.00003 to 0.0007 for RME and 0.000005 to 0.0002 for CTE.Site 25 is expected to become part of the existing state park system. Several pathways wereevaluated as part of a ecological risk assessment. However, the key ecological risk drivers areExecutive Summary Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA ES-3considered to be those chemicals of ecological concern that appear to have a potential adverseimpact on the more wide-ranging transient receptors of concern who may receive additionalexposures(s) to other areas of potential contamination. These chemicals of concern have apotential for adverse effects beyond the administrative boundaries of Site 25. They includemercury and the more frequently detected pesticides and carnivores exposed to total DDT andtotal endrin.Data of sufficient quality and quantity has been collected to characterize Site 25. Physical andchemical investigation results indicate that there are potential ecological concerns while humanhealth concerns are insignificant. Based on the results of the Phase I RI and Phase II RFI aCorrective Measures Study has been recommended to evaluate various alternatives to reduceecological exposures to acceptable levels.Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 1-1Jenny Lind Pond (Site 25), a formerretention basin with a water surfacearea covering approximately 21acres, is situated in the east-centralportion of INAAP, within the JennyLind Run, approximately 1,600 feetwest of the Ohio River (see Figure1-1). The main branch of the pondoccupied approximately 8.9 acres;this measurement was previouslyreported as the size of the entire sitein earlier reports. It is situatedwithin the Jenny Lind Run,downstream of the Process WasteSettling Basin. Woodlands surroundthe former pond area (see Figure 1-2).An earthen dam was constructed at the southeastern end of the pond. A drain spillway structurewas located near the southern end of the dam. An emergency spillway composed of limestonerip-rap was located on the north end of the dam.The dam failed in the spring of 1997 as a result of a 10-inch rain event and the subsequentflooding of the Ohio River. The flooding of the Ohio River was so great that it caused water toflow over the dam from the downstream side to the upstream side. The failure occurred on thesouth end of the dam at the drain spillway. The pond drained and is empty today with smallstreams running through it.Jenny Lind Run drains into the southern arm of the former pond and receives surface water fromthe following sites:· South Ash Settling Basin (Site 4)· Process Waste Settling Basin (Site 25)· Building 714-18: Material Storage (Site 7)· Building 722-23: Area Shop Organics Area (Site 9)· P&E Area Sewage Treatment Plant (Site 10)· P&E Area Neutralization Facility (Site 16)· Salvage Yard (Site 19)· Caustic Cleaning Facility (Site 20)· Septic Tank: Building 228-1 (Site 29)· Farmhouse Basement Burial Pit (Site 32)Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 1-2· Building 706-1: Laboratory (Site 35)· Building 228-1: Laboratory (Site 36)· Rail Shiphouse Can Storage Area (Site 48-1)· Building 104-3: Cotton Dry House (Site 53)· Stability Laboratory Building 706-4 (Site 62)· P&E Area (Site 63)· Southern portion of the Rail Shiphouse Area (Site 65)· Acid Area Analytical Lab: Building 706-2 (Site 70)· Former USTs - 716-2 and 718· Northern half of the Truck Shiphouse Area (Site 77)In addition, the former pond also received surface water from three streams. Two streams, whichdrain into the northern arm of the former pond, collect drainage from the eastern and northernportion of the Rail Shiphouse Area (Site 65) including:· Building 229-156 (Site 21)· Suspected Propellant Area East of P-Loop (Site 24)· Construction Debris Landfill (Site 69-5)· the area between Site 65 and Burning Area 616· the Ravine Dumping Area (Site 59)The third stream, which drains to a location near the former boat ramp, collects drainage fromthe southern and central portion of Burning Area 616 including:· the former Burning Ground (Site 17)· Old Trash Burning Area (Site 26)· Building 714-5 Lead Storage (Site 27)· Drainage Area Dumping Ground (Site 28)· Trash Incinerator (Site 34)· Powder Incinerator (Site 56)· Burning Ground Landfill (Site 60)1.1 OPERATIONAL HISTORY AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICSBased on interviews, aerial photographs, records review, and site reconnaissance, the followingoperational history and waste characteristics were determined:Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 1-3· Jenny Lind Pond was dammed in the late 1950s to hold industrial water forpossible treatment before discharge to the Ohio River (USATHAMA 1980). Thepond received P&E Area effluent, possibly containing nitroaromatics/nitraminesand heavy metals.· The pond was renovated and restocked with fish in 1981 (Natural ResourcesManagement Plan 1988). The types of fish stocked included bass, channelcatfish, blue gill, and red sunfish. The Natural Resources Management Plan(1988) reported an annual average of 200 visitors engaged in fishing activities atthe plant. This would have included Jenny Lind Pond and Fourteen Mile Creek,and possibly the pond near Building 2531 along Highway 62.· Flooding of the Ohio River has caused flooding in Jenny Lind Run up to JennyLind Pond dam (USATHAMA 1980); flooding occurred during the field activitiesfor the Phase I Remedial Investigation (RI).· A quantitative risk analysis of mercury-contaminated fish was completed in April1995 (USACHPPM 1995). The results of the study are discussed in the Phase IRI report.· The dam failed and the pond drained in the spring of 1997 due to excessiverainfall and flooding of the Ohio River. Presently, the pond is empty.1.2 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONSDames & Moore completed a Contamination Survey at the site in 1984 (D&M 1984). Sixsediment core samples were collected from the area of Jenny Lind Pond. The study revealed thatorganic compounds (including unidentified hydrocarbons, diethyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate,diphenylamines, fluoranthene, nitrocellulose, pyrene, and 2,4-dinitrotoluene), metals (includinglevels of cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, and zinc above background), and other chemicals(including levels of nitrite/nitrite and phosphate) were present at all depths sampled (fromground surface to 14.5 feet bgs). A water sample, which was taken from the basin, showeddetections of chromium and lead. Nitrate and sulfate were detected at levels higher than thebackground samples.However, the analytical methodologies or detection limits are not comparable to currentrequirements, rendering the analytical data collected during this survey incomparable to the datacollected, following current standards, during the Phase I RI and the Phase II ResourceConservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI).After the dam failure in 1997, ICI Americas Inc. (ICI) collected sediment and surface watersamples from the area of Site 25. A Final Incident Report (ICI 1997) was issued for thisinvestigation. The analytical results for these samples are discussed in the ChemicalInvestigation Results and the Contamination Assessment, below.Site Location and DescriptionSECTIONONE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 1-41.3 REPORT ORGANIZATIONThe remaining portion of this report is organized as follows:· Section 2 – Field Activities Summary· Section 3 – Physical Investigation Results: reviews site topography, localsurficial geology, and shallow hydrogeology· Section 4 – Data Quality Review and Validation: summarizes the results of the100 percent quality control (QC) review and the ten percent full validation· Section 5 – Chemical Investigation Results: identifies the chemical analyses usedand field duplicate samples collected; summarizes the sample detections bysample identification number and matrix type in tabular form· Section 6 – Contamination Assessment: presents an evaluation, both in text andon figures, of chemicals present at the sight in elevated concentrations by matrixand chemical group· Section 7 – Human Health Risk Evaluation: examines the chemicals present invarious matrices at the site to determine if they pose a threat to human health· Section 8 – Ecological Health Risk Evaluation: examines the chemicals presentin various matrices at the site to determine if they pose a threat to the environment· Section 9 – Summary and Recommendations: includes corrective measure studyobjectives· Section 10 – ReferencesFor additional information regarding the rationale for and the objectives of the Phase II RFI,refer to the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a).Field Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 2-1Field activities for this site included geophysical surveying, and sediment, subsurface soil,surface water, groundwater monitoring well installation and groundwater sampling. Thelocations of the sampling points are provided on Figure 2-1. Sample location, identification,depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Table 2-1 for samples collected in 1996and Table 2-2 for samples collected in 2000. All field activities were completed in accordancewith applicable Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) (W-C 1998, URSGWC 2000b). Anydeviations from the SOPs are noted on the Sample Collection Field Sheets (SCFS), provided inAppendix G. Monitoring well analytical results are discussed in Site 90 InstallationGroundwater (URS in progress).2.1 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYAn electrical resistivity survey was completed as part of the Phase II RFI. The survey includedeight transects. Electrodes were spaced at 10-foot intervals. The east-west transect wascompleted in three arrays due to the length of the basin and the short electrode spacing.2.2 SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING2.2.1 SoilTen near surface soil samples were collected within the discharge area below the earthen dam ofthe former Jenny Lind Pond. Surface samples 25SS01 through 25SS10 were completed at thefollowing locations (see Figure 2-1) using a stainless steel hand auger:· 25SS01, 25SS03, and 25SS04 – Directly downstream of the emergency spillwayarea in a relatively flat, grassy floodplain.· 25SS02, 25SS05, 25SS06, 25SS07, 25SS08, 25SS09, and 25SS10 – Along the topof the bank of Jenny Lind Run at various locations directly downstream of theprincipal spillway discharge.Fourteen borings were completed at the former pond, including 12 direct push borings and twomonitoring well borings. Boring locations were selected based on geophysical survey data (seeSection 2.2), historical information, and site accessibility. Borings 25SB01 through 25SB12were completed at the following locations (see Figure 2-1) using a direct push system and 1.75-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) liners:· 25SB01 – Near the intersection of Electrical Resistivity Transects #1 and 2· 25SB02 – Near the midpoint of Electrical Resistivity Transect #8· 25SB03 – Along Electrical Resistivity Transect #1 northwest of soil boring25SB01· 25SB04 – At a point below the dam, east of the former pond basin· 25SB05 – At a location west-northwest of the boat rampField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 2-2· 25SB06 – Near the northeastern endpoint of Electrical Resistivity Transect #7· 25SB07 – At a point near the northern end of the former pond’s northern branch· 25SB08 – Near the midpoint of Electrical Resistivity Transect #3· 25SB09 – Near the midpoint of Electrical Resistivity Transect #4· 25SB10 – At a location west of Electrical Resistivity Transect #5· 25SB11 – At a point near Electrical Resistivity Transect #6· 25SB12 – At a location near the western end of the former pond’s southernbranchFour to six samples were collected from each boring for chemical analysis. Sampleidentification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. Boringlocations are shown on Figure 2-1.Monitoring wells 25MW03 and 25MW04 were installed in borings drilled next to borings25SB01 and 25SB03, respectively. Boring logs and monitoring well construction diagrams areincluded in Appendix E.Fourteen geotechnical samples (including three collected during the monitoring wellinstallations) were collected from Site 25 during the Phase II RFI. The analytical results fromthese geotechnical samples are presented in Table F-1 in Appendix F.2.2.2 SedimentForty sediment samples (14 from the drainage areas and 26 from the basin of the former pond)were collected at the site. All but one of the sediment samples (25SD39) were collocated withsurface water samples discussed in Section 2.5. The sediment samples were collected from thefollowing locations (see Figure 2-1):Former Pond Basin· 25SD03 through 25SD05 – Above the earthen dam· 25SD06 and 25SD10 – Near the north bank of the main section of the formerpond· 25SD07, 25SD08, and 25SD13 – Near the south bank of the main section of theformer pond· 25SD09 – From the center of the main section of the former pond· 25SD11, 25SD12, and 25SD15 through 25SD18 – From the northern branch ofthe former pond· 25SD14 – Near the northeastern edge of the main section of the former pondbetween the northern and southern branchesField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 2-3· 25SD19 through 25SD27 – From the southern branch of the former pond· 25SD32 – Near the southern endpoint of Electrical Resistivity Transect #2Drainage Areas· 25SD01, 25SD02, 25SD33 through 25SD35 – Below the earthen dam at the lowerend of the Jenny Lind Run· 25SD28 and 25SD38– From the Jenny Lind Run above the point it enters thebasin· 25SD29 and 25SD39 – From the drainage that enters the northern branch of theformer pond from the northeast· 25SD30 and 25SD36 – From the drainage that enters the northern branch of theformer pond from the northwest· 25SD31 – From the drainage that enters the main portion of the former pond fromthe north (near the boat ramp)· 25SD37 – From the drainage that enters the southern branch of the former pondfrom the north· 25SD40 – From the drainage that enters the southern branch of the former pondfrom the southSediment samples 06SD04 and 06SD04 were collected from 0 to 0.2 feet bgs. Sample location,identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.2.3 WATER SAMPLING2.3.1 Surface Water SamplingThirty-nine surface water samples (13 from the drainage areas and 26 from the former pond area)were collected at the site. All of the surface water samples were collocated with sedimentsamples discussed in Section 2.2. All surface water results are included in this discussion.However, surface water samples 25SW03 through 25SW30 were collected from the former pondprior to the 1997 dam failure. The sediment samples were collected from the following locations(see Figure 2-1):Former Pond Area· 25SW03 through 25SW05 – Above the earthen dam· 25SW06 and 25SW10 – Near the north bank of the main section of the formerpond· 25SW07, 25SW08, and 25SW13 – Near the south bank of the main section of theformer pondField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 2-4· 25SW09 – From the center of the main section of the former pond· 25SW11, 25SW12, and 25SW15 through 25SW18 – From the northern branch ofthe former pond· 25SW14 – Near the northeastern edge of the main section of the former pondbetween the northern and southern branches· 25SW19 through 25SW27 – From the southern branch of the former pond· 25SW32 – Collected from the stream within the former pond basin after the damfailure, near the southern endpoint of Electrical Resistivity Transect #2Drainage Areas· 25SW01, 25SW02, 25SW33 through 25SW35 – Below the earthen dam at thelower end of the Jenny Lind Run· 25SW28 and 25SW38– From the Jenny Lind Run above the point it enters thebasin· 25SW29 – From the drainage that enters the northern branch of the former pondfrom the northeast· 25SW30 and 25SW36 – From the drainage that enters the northern branch of theformer pond from the northwest· 25SW31 – From the drainage that enters the main portion of the former pondfrom the north (near the boat ramp)· 25SW37 – From the drainage that enters the southern branch of the former pondfrom the north· 25SW40 – From the drainage that enters the southern branch of the former pondfrom the southSample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.2.3.2 Direct Push Groundwater SamplingEleven groundwater samples were collected during the Phase II RFI sampling activities at Site25. Groundwater samples were collected from direct push borings 25SB01 through 25SB03, and25SB05 through 25SB12. Groundwater was not encountered in boring 25SB04; therefore, agroundwater sample was not collected from this boring.Seven of the 11 groundwater samples were collected from direct push borings (25SB01, 25SB03,25SB05, 25SB06, 25SB07, 25SB11, and 25SB12) through slotted, PVC standpipes. The otherfour groundwater samples were collected from direct push borings (25SB02, 25SB08, 25SB09,and 25SB10) through the exposed screen of a screen point sampler attached to the extensionrods. Samples for VOCs analysis were collected using a stainless steel minibailer. Prior to theField Activities SummarySECTIONTWO Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 2-5collection of samples for other analyses, at least 500 milliliters (mL) of water purged from eachboring using a peristaltic pump and high density polyethylene (HDPE) tubing. Samples for otheranalyses were collected using the peristaltic pump and HDPE tubing.Sample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.Boring locations are shown on Figure 2-1.2.3.3 Monitoring Well SamplingFour monitoring wells were installed and a groundwater sample was collected from each well(25MW01 through 25MW04) during the Phase II RFI sampling activities at Site 25.The monitoring wells were purged and sampled after development according to the SOPs. Thewells were purged using a stainless steel submersible pump. A minimum of three well volumesof water was purged prior to sample collection. After purging, all parameters except VOCs werecollected using the submersible pump. The pump was removed, and an additional two to threegallons of water was then bailed from the well using a disposable Teflon bailer to remove anystagnant water missed by the pump. A water sample for VOC analysis was then collected usingthe disposable Teflon bailer. All purge water was containerized as IDW.Sample identification, depth, matrix, and chemical analysis are presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.Well locations are shown on Figure 2-1.2.4 FIELD SCREENING RESULTSField screening was completed during the Phase II RFI using headspace analysis. Recovered soilfrom each boring was field screened using a photoionization detector (PID) to verify thepresence or absence of organic vapors. Headspace results are presented in Table 2-3, and wererecorded on the boring logs (see Appendix E) and the Sample Collection Field Sheets (SCFSs)(see Appendix G).2.5 IDW DISPOSITIONInvestigation-derived wastes (IDW) including soil cuttings, development and purge water,decontamination fluids, and personal protective equipment (PPE) were containerized inaccordance with the Sitewide Work Plan (URSGWC 2000a). Disposal of the IDW containershas been documented in the “IDW Disposition Technical Memorandum” (URS 2001).TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDParametersSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs) Sample Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Pest/PCB3 Metals4Nitroaromatics/Nitramines5 Nitrate/Nitrite6 Comments25SS01 2501SS02 1-2 Soil X X X X X X25SS02 2502SS02 0-2 Soil X X X X X X2511SS02 0-2 Soil X X X X X X Duplicate (2502SS02)25SS03 2503SS02 0-2 Soil X X X X X X MS/MSD25SS04 2504SS02 0-2 Soil X X X X X X25SS05 2505SS02 0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X25SS06 2506SS02 0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X25SS07 2507SS02 0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X25SS08 2508SS02 0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X25SS09 2509SS02 0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X25SS10 2510SS02 0-2.0 Soil X X X X X X25SD01 2501SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD02 2502SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X2539SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X Duplicate (2502SD00)25SD03 2503SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD04 2504SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD05 2505SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD06 2506SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD07 2507SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD08 2508SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD09 2509SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD10 2510SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD11 2511SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD12 2512SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD13 2513SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD14 2514SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD15 2515SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD16 2516SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD17 2517SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD18 2518SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD19 2519SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD20 2520SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD21 2521SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X MS/MSD25SD22 2522SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD23 2523SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X XQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 1 of 36/17/02TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDParametersSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs) Sample Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Pest/PCB3 Metals4Nitroaromatics/Nitramines5 Nitrate/Nitrite6 Comments25SD24 2524SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD25 2525SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD26 2526SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD27 2527SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SD28 2528SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X2540SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X Duplicate (2528SD00)25SD29 2529SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X MS/MSD25SD30 2530SD00 NM Sediment X X X X X X25SW01 2501SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW02 2502SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW03 2503SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X2539SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X Duplicate (2503SW00)25SW04 2504SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW05 2505SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW06 2506SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW07 2507SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW08 2508SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW09 2509SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW10 2510SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW11 2511SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW12 2512SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW13 2513SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW14 2514SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW15 2515SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW16 2516SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW17 2517SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW18 2518SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW19 2519SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW20 2520SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW21 2521SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X MS/MSD25SW22 2522SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW23 2523SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW24 2524SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW25 2525SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW26 2526SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X XQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 2 of 36/17/02TABLE 2-1SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDParametersSampleLocationSampleIdentificationSampleDepth (ft bgs) Sample Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Pest/PCB3 Metals4Nitroaromatics/Nitramines5 Nitrate/Nitrite6 Comments25SW27 2527SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X25SW28 2528SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X2540SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X Duplicate (2528SW00)25SW29 2529SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X X MS/MSD25SW30 2530SW00 NA Surface Water X X X X X XNotes: Abbreviations:Samples were collected in 1995 and 1996. bgs = below ground surfaceAll samples to be analyzed for chemical analysis were shipped EMAX Laboratory, Inc, of Torrance, California.1 TCL Volatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Method 5030 / Analysis Method 8260A.23 TCL Pesticides and PCBs: Preparation Methods 3520 (aqueous) and 3550 (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8080. NA = Not Applicable4 TAL Metals: Preparation Methods 3010/3020 (aqueous) and 3050B (soil) / Analysis Methods 6010/7000. NM = Not Measured5 Nitroaromatics/nitramines were prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 8330. SB = Soil Boring6 Nitrate/Nitrite was prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 300. SD = SedimentSW = Surface Waterft = feetMS/MSD = Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike DuplicateSurface soil samples collected (from 0.0 to 2.0 ft bgs) during the Phase I RI use 02 for the depth indicator portion of theSample Identification.Duplicate = Quality Control Duplicate(original sample listed immediately above)TCL Semivolatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 3520 (aqueous) and 3550 (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method8270.Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 3 of 36/17/02TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDSample Sample SampleIdentification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3 Nitroaromatic/Nitramines4 Pesticides/PCBs5 TOC6 TDS/TSS7 Geotech8 Comments25SB01 2501DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2501DS11 9.0-11.0 Soil X X X X X X2501DS12 10.8-12.0 Soil X2501DS21 19.0-21.0 Soil X X X X X2501DS51 19.0-21.0 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (2501DS21)2501DS31 29.0-31.0 Soil X X X X X2501DS32 31.1-32.0 Soil X2501DS41 39.0-41.0 Soil X X X X X2501DS50 48.0-50.0 Soil X X X X X2501DW49 47.0-49.0 Groundwater X X X X X X2501DW59 47.0-49.0 Groundwater X X X X X X Duplicate (2501DW49)25SB02 2502DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2502DS17 15.0-17.0 Soil X X X X X X2502DS18 17.1-18.0 Soil X2502DS29 27.0-29.0 Soil X X X X X2502DS39 37.0-39.0 Soil X X X X X2502DW18 10.0-18.0 Groundwater X X X X X MS/MSD25SB03 2503DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2503DS60 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (2503DS00)2503DS20 18.0-20.0 Soil X X X X X MS/MSD2503DS37 35.0-37.0 Soil X X X X X X2503DS38 36.8-37.7 Soil X2503DS50 48.0-50.0 Soil X X X X X2503DW52 50.0-52.0 Groundwater X X X X X X25SB04 2504DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X MS/MSD2504DS17 15.0-17.0 Soil X X X X X2504DS31 28.0-30.0 Soil X X X X X X2504DS40 38.0-40.0 Soil X X X X X25SB05 2505DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2505DS14 12.0-14.0 Soil X X X X X X2505DS04 3.5-4 Soil X2505DS16 14-15 Soil X2505DS26 24.0-26.0 Soil X X X X X2505DS37 34.5-36.5 Soil X X X X XSample ParametersLocationQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 1 of 46/17/02TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDSample Sample SampleIdentification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3 Nitroaromatic/Nitramines4 Pesticides/PCBs5 TOC6 TDS/TSS7 Geotech8 CommentsSample ParametersLocation2505DW29 27.0-29.0 Groundwater X X X X X X25SB06 2506DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2506DS12 10.0-12.0 Soil X X X X X2506DS40 10.0-12.0 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (2506DS12)2506DS23 21.0-23.0 Soil X X X X X X2506DS25 23.6-24.8 Soil X2506DS31 30.5-31.0 Soil X X X X X2506DW33 31.0-33.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SB07 2507DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2507DS11 9.0-10.8 Soil X X X X X MS/MSD2507DS20 18.0-20.0 Soil X X X X X X2507DS28 27.0-28.0 Soil X X X X X2507DW27 25.0-27.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SB08 2508DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2508DS02 1.0-2.0 Soil X2508DS17 15.0-17.0 Soil X X X X X2508DS30 28.0-30.0 Soil X X X X X X2508DS31 30.0-31.0 Soil X2508DW19 10.0-19.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SB09 2509DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2509DS14 11.4-13.4 Soil X X X X X X2509DS24 22.0-24.0 Soil X X X X X2509DS26 24.6-25.8 Soil X2509DS38 36.0-38.0 Soil X X X X X2509DW20 10.0-20.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SB10 2510DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2510DS10 9.0-10.2 Soil X X X X X X2510DS20 18.0-20.0 Soil X X X X X2510DS50 18.0-20.0 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (2510DS20)2510DS22 21.0-22.0 Soil X2510DS30 28.0-30.0 Soil X X X X X2510DW19 10.0-19.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SB11 2511DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2511DS10 8.0-10.0 Soil X X X X X2511DS12 10.8-12.0 Soil XQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 2 of 46/17/02TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDSample Sample SampleIdentification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3 Nitroaromatic/Nitramines4 Pesticides/PCBs5 TOC6 TDS/TSS7 Geotech8 CommentsSample ParametersLocation2511DS19 17.0-19.0 Soil X X X X X X2511DS29 27.0-29.0 Soil X X X X X2511DW29 27.0-29.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SB12 2512DS00 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X2512DS40 0.0-1.0 Soil X X X X X Duplicate (2512DS00)2512DS09 7.0-9.0 Soil X X X X X X2512DS11 10.0-11.0 Soil X2512DS16 15.4-16.4 Soil X X X X X2512DS22 21.0-21.4 Soil X X X X X2512DW12 10.0-12.0 Groundwater X X X X X25SW/SD31 2531SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2531SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD32 2532SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2532SD00 0.0-1.0 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD33 2533SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2533SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD34 2534SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2534SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD35 2535SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2535SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD36 2536SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2536SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD37 2537SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2537SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X25SW/SD38 2538SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X2538SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X2588SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X Duplicate (2538SD00)Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 3 of 46/17/02TABLE 2-2SUMMARY OF PHASE II RFI SAMPLES FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSISSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDSample Sample SampleIdentification Depth (ft bgs) Matrix VOCs1 SVOCs2 Metals3 Nitroaromatic/Nitramines4 Pesticides/PCBs5 TOC6 TDS/TSS7 Geotech8 CommentsSample ParametersLocation25SD39 2539SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X MS/MSD25SW/SD40 2540SW00 - Surface Water X X X X X MS/MSD2540SD00 0.0-0.2 Sediment X X X X X25MW01 2501MW01 51.3 btoc Groundwater X X X X X MS/MSD2501MW45 43.6-45.4 Soil X25MW02 2502MW01 17.5 btoc Groundwater X X X X X2552MW01 17.5 btoc Groundwater X X X X X Duplicate (2502MW01)2502MW12 12.0-13.5 Soil X25MW03 2503MW01 59.2 btoc Groundwater X X X X X X25MW04 22550044MMWW0518 5568..09- b5t8o.0c GrouSnodiwl ater X X X X X XNotes: Abbreviations:Samples were collected in 2000. bgs = below ground surfacebtoc = below top of casing1234 SB = Soil Boring5678 Geotechnical parameters varied from sample to sample depending on sample depth, soil type, etc. Refer to Appendix F for a complete summary of allgeotechnical analyses.All samples to be analyzed for chemical analysis were shipped EMAX Laboratory, Inc, of Torrance, California.TCL Volatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 5030 (aqueous/sediment) and 5035 (soil) / Analysis Method 8260B.TCL Semivolatile Organic Compounds: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) / Analysis Method 8270C.TAL Metals: Preparation Method 3010A (aqueous) and 3050B (soil) / Analysis Methods 6010B/7470A (mercury).Nitroaromatics/nitramines were prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 8330.Total Dissolved Solids/Total Suspended Solids (TDS/TSS) were prepared and analyzed as identified in Methods 160.1/160.2.SD = SedimentSW = Surface WaterTCL Pesticides and PCBs: Preparation Methods 3520C (aqueous) and 3550B (soil/sediment) / Analysis Methods 8081A (Pesticides) and 8082(PCBs).Total Organic Carbon (TOC) was prepared and analyzed as identified in Method 415.1.Surface soil samples collected (from 0.0 to 2.0 ft bgs) during the Phase II RFI use 00 for the depth indicator portion of the Sample Identification. DS = Direct Push - SoilDuplicate = Quality Control Duplicate(original sample identification in parentheses)MS/MSD = Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike DuplicateDW = Direct Push - Groundwaterft = feetQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 4 of 46/17/02TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANIC VAPORSIN SOIL SAMPLES1SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)225SB01 0.0-0.5 ND25SB01 9.0-11.0 ND25SB01 19.0-21.0 ND25SB01 24.0-31.0 ND25SB01 48.0-50.0 ND25SB01 39.0-41.0 ND25SB02 0.0-0.5 ND25SB02 15.0-17.0 ND25SB02 27.0-29.0 ND25SB02 37.0-39.0 ND25SB03 0.0-0.5 ND25SB03 18.0-20.0 ND25SB03 35.0-37.0 ND25SB03 48.0-50.0 ND25SB04 0.0-0.5 ND25SB04 15.0-17.0 ND25SB04 28.0-30.0 ND25SB04 38.0-40.025SB05 0.0-0.5 ND25SB05 12.0-14.0 ND25SB05 24.0-26.0 ND25SB05 34.5-36.5 ND25SB06 0.0-0.5 0.825SB06 10.0-12.0 0.425SB06 21.0-23.0 0.525SB06 30.5-31.0 0.725SB07 0.0-0.5 0.525SB07 9.0-10.8 0.925SB07 18.0-20.0 0.625SB07 27.0-28.025SB08 0.0-0.5 ND25SB08 15.0-17.0 ND25SB08 28.0-30.0 ND25SB09 0.0-0.5 0.225SB09 11.4-13.4 ND25SB09 22.0-24.0 ND25SB09 36.0-38.0 ND25SB10 0.0-0.5 ND25SB10 9.0-10.2 0.325SB10 18.0-20.0 0.325SB10 28.0-30.0 0.2Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Draft\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 1 of 2 6/17/02TABLE 2-3SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING FOR ORGANIC VAPORSIN SOIL SAMPLES1SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDBoring Number Sample Depth (ft bgs) Concentration (ppm)225SB11 0.0-0.5 3.125SB11 8.0-10.0 7.125SB11 17.0-19.0 0.525SB11 27.0-29.0 ND25SB12 0.0-1.0 0.725SB12 7.0-9.0 1.125SB12 15.4-16.4 NA25SB12 21.0-21.4 NANotes:1 Headspace readings were not taken for sediment samples because they were collected beneath water.2 Measured response above background using a photoionization detectorAbbreviations:ft = Feetbgs = Below Ground Surfaceppm = Part Per MillionSS = Shallow Soil SampleSB = Soil BoringND = Not DetectedNA = Not Available Due to Insufficient Sample RecoveryQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Draft\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 2 of 2 6/17/02Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 3-13.1 TOPOGRPAHY AND SURFACE FEATURESSurface features at the site are shown on Figure 1-1. The bed of the former pond is relatively flatand covered with dense vegetation that ranges up to 10 feet in height during the summer months.Most of this vegetation consists of grasses and weeds. The presence of soft sediment at theground surface has rendered the site inaccessible by vehicles, except under dry conditions. Thebasin sits at the junction of two steep-sided valleys, both of which are heavily wooded.The former pond has two branches, north and south. The south branch is part of the Jenny LindRun. Jenny Lind Run continues to flow through the former pond bed as the larger of twostreams. The smaller stream, which flows from the north branch, empties into the larger streamin the main body of the former pond (Figure 1-1). Both streams are typically incised less than 7feet into the former pond bed.The south branch contained several active beaver dams during the Phase II RFI fieldwork. Onedam across the breach in the Jenny Lind Pond dam was removed to facilitate the electricalresistivity survey. These dams were present only in the south branch and were found at variousintervals along the entire length of the south branch. At least four active dams were observedduring the fieldwork. Two dams near the head of the south branch were the cause of localizedflooding in the basin.Man-made structures located at the site include an earthen dam (except where it is washed out),an emergency spillway, and a concrete boat ramp. These structures are located within the samegeneral area (Figure 1-1). A 36-inch water main that runs northwest to southeast is located northof the basin.The former pond continues to receive surface water from Jenny Lind Run and numerousephemeral streams, and runoff from the surrounding area. The water received by the siteevaporates, infiltrates into the aquifer system, or discharges through the breach in the dam to thelower reach of Jenny Lind Run. The lower reach of Jenny Lind Run discharges to the OhioRiver. The area below the dam is relatively flat. The upper portion of this area is usually dry,but susceptible to flooding of the Ohio River. Standing water is common in the areaapproximately 100 yards below the dam.The site is accessible by a dirt road located near the dam and boat ramp.Historical drawings and the stratigraphy encountered at the location of monitoring well 25MW03indicate the well was installed west of the influence of dam construction. Based on historicaland recent topographic maps, topographic survey data for monitoring wells 25MW03 and25MW04, and an interpretation of the site stratigraphy (discussed in detail in Section 3.2), it islikely that the layer of process waste materials present in the former pond’s basin is generallyonly a few to several feet thick.A review of the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 1937 and 1950 revised topographic maps(Charlestown Quadrangle, USGS 1937a and USGS 1937b) indicate that the Jenny Lind PondPhysical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 3-2dam was built across existing Ohio River alluvial deposits in the Jenny Lind Run. The dam wasconstructed in the mid-1950s, after the majority of production activities at INAAP had beencompleted (prior to 1946).A comparison between the Jenny Lind Pond at the time of the most recent sampling event(November 2000 to January 2001) and the 1937 topographic map showed that the topographybelow the dam has changed very little during the dam’s existence. In addition, ground surfaceelevations taken in January 2001 at monitoring wells above and below the dam (25MW03 and25MW04, respectively) show a drop of only 2.48 feet, indicating that likely only a few feet ofprocess waste materials were deposited above the dam after its construction. The thickestdeposits of process waste materials would have occurred in the incised stream channel of theJenny Lind Run after the dam’s construction. Based on the elevations of the ground surfacewithin the area of the pond prior to the dam’s completion and on the elevations of the OhioRiver, it is likely that the channel would have been about 10 to 15 feet deep or less prior thedam’s presence.3.2 LOCAL SURFICIAL GEOLOGYThe local surficial geology of this site has been interpreted based on a review of historicaltopographic maps, an electrical resistivity survey, 12 direct push soil borings, two hollow-stemauger borings converted to monitoring wells and the geotechnical analysis of 13 soil samples.The results of the electrical resistivity survey are presented on Figures 3-1 through 3-8. Theshallow stratigraphy is presented in geologic cross sections on Figures 3-9 through 3-11.Elevations in feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) on the figures are based on the North American Datumof 1988.3.2.1 Geophysical Survey ResultsThe electrical resistivity of subsurface materials can be affected by a number of differentphysical characteristics. Physical characteristics that act to reduce electrical resistivity includeincreasing water content, increasing salinity of groundwater, increasing clay content, anddecreasing grain size. Additionally, the presence of water-filled voids such as fractures or porespaces and other primary or secondary porosity features lower electrical resistivity.Conversely, an absence or decrease in water content, a decrease in void space, porosity, orfracturing and an increasing degree of compaction or lithification can act to increase theelectrical resistivity. Typical ranges of electrical resistivities of various materials are as follows:Materials Resistivity(Ohm-Meters)Wet to moist clayey soil and wet clay 1s to 10swet to moist silty clay soil and silty clay Low 10sWet to moist silty and sandy soils 10s to 1000sPhysical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 3-3Materials Resistivity(Ohm-Meters)Well-fractured to slightly fractured rock with moist,soil-filled cracks 100sSand and gravel with layers of silt Low 1000sSlightly fractured rock with dry, soil-filled cracks Low 1000sCoarse, dry sand and gravel deposits High 1000sMassively bedded rock High 1000sNote: Adapted from H.R. Burger, 1992, Exploration Geophysics of the Shallow SubsurfaceA review of the electrical resistivity survey data indicated that the bedrock surface beneath thebasin is irregular and varies from only a few feet to as much as 65 feet in depth (Figures 3-1through 3-8). Two electrical resistivity transects were completed within the main basin of theformer pond, Transect 1 (Figure 3-1) and Transect 2 (Figure 3-2). The locations of the electricalresistivity transects are shown on Figure 2-1.The greatest depth to bedrock encountered during the resistivity survey was approximately 65feet bgs along Transect 1. The bedrock surface along this transect appeared to be slightlyirregular with two points that are approximately 15 feet higher than the remaining portion of thebedrock surface covered by Transect 1. The boring for monitoring well 25MW03, completedabout 10 feet east of 25SB01, was stopped at 60 feet bgs, short of refusal, which verified thatbedrock at this point is greater than 60 feet bgs. Boring 25SB01, completed near the intersectionof Transects 1 and 2, hit refusal at 50 feet bgs in a sand and gravel layer, which most likely wasthe effective drilling limit of the direct push rig, as opposed to bedrock.Transect 2 (Figure 3-2) crossed Transect 1 approximately 200 feet west of the east end-point ofTransect 1 (Figure 2-1). This transect indicated a maximum depth to bedrock of approximately56 feet bgs, with a pinnacle in the bedrock surface at 250-foot to 260-foot interval that extendsupward to a depth of about 29 feet bgs. This pinnacle may represent a divide between olderchannels incised in the bedrock or it may be a remnant of a solution feature.Transects 3 through 6 were completed in the south branch of the former pond (see Figure 2-1 forlocations). The maximum depth to bedrock indicated by the survey ranges from 45 feet to 52feet bgs, but the maximum depth may extend deeper in Transect 5. In Transect 5, there appearedto be a buried channel or solution feature present along the north side of the valley, with ashallower ledge on the south side (Figure 3-5). The bedrock surface in Transects 3 and 4(Figures 3-3 and 3-4) appeared bowl-like, with no major channels or other features indicated.In Transect 6 (Figure 3-6), a buried channel or solution feature appears to be located on the southside of the valley. Maximum depth to bedrock was measured at about 35 feet bgs, but the surveydid not extend deep enough to measure the deepest part of the bedrock surface.Transects 7 and 8 (Figures 3-7 and 3-8) were completed in the north branch of the former pond.Transect 7 indicated the bedrock surface is relatively flat with steep drops along the edge of thePhysical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 3-4basin. Transect 8 indicated the presence of a solution feature or channel in the middle of thetransect.3.2.2 Soil Borings and Geotechnical AnalysisIn general, the shallow stratigraphy at Site 25 consists of a thin layer (approximately 2 to 5 feet)of process waste materials overlying a 50– to 60–foot thick Ohio River alluvial deposit of siltand clay. In most soil borings, refusal occurred in this alluvial silt and clay deposit. A 1– to 10–foot thick layer of alluvium with sand and gravel overlying the Ohio River alluvium wasobserved in some borings.The process waste materials encountered were typically dark in color (gray to black), whichlikely indicated a high content of organic material. A layer of light brown fibrous material(possibly nitrocellulose) more than one foot thick was encountered in borings 25SB08 and25SB09, at depths less than four feet bgs. The total thickness of process waste materials abovethe dam varies from a few feet over much of the basin bottom to possibly several feet in incisedchannels.A three to four-foot thick layer of clay with cinders was observed in boring 25SB05. This boringwas drilled where the main drainage from the Burning Ground Area empties into the formerJenny Lind Pond. The cinders are likely from Site 26 – Old Trash Burning Area.Two types of alluvium were identified at Site 25, including alluvium containing coarse-grainedmaterials and alluvium that consisted primarily of clay and silt. The coarse-grained alluviumtypically was observed overlying the fine-grained alluvium.Alluvium with coarse-grained materials (sand and gravel) occurred primarily in the upperportions of borings 25SB05, 25SB06, and 25SB09 through 25SB12. This alluvium with coarse-grainedmaterials was likely deposited by stream flow associated with the Jenny Lind Run orother drainages emptying into the former Jenny Lind Pond. A one-foot thick layer of gravel withclay (also likely stream deposited) was observed in the bottom one-foot of boring25SB01/25MW03, from 60 to 61 feet bgs.The fine-grained alluvium appears to be a continuous deposit of several to more than 50 feetthick with no distinct sand or gravel layers observed within it, although a few soil samplescontained trace amounts of very fine sand. It appears to be thickest in the central portions of theformer pond, and thinner toward the edges. The fine-grained alluvium has been interpreted ashaving been deposited by the Ohio River.Monitoring wells were installed above and below the dam. One well was installed adjacent toboring 25SB01 (25MW03) and the other well was installed adjacent to boring 25SB04(25MW04). The borings for both wells were completed to greater depths than the direct pushborings. The boring for well 25MW03 (25SB01) encountered a gravel layer from 60 to 61 feetbgs while the boring for well 25MW04 (25SB04) encountered clay to silty clay alluvium todepth.Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 3-5Two additional wells 25MW01 and 25MW02 were installed about 1,300 feet below the damalong Jenny Lind Run. These wells are discussed in the RFI report for Site 90 – InstallationGroundwater (URS in progress).Residuum was identified in only one boring, 25SB05. Only about 2.5 feet were encountered.Residual clay soils were only identified in one boring (25SB05) and bedrock was only identifiedin one boring (25SB12).In summary, the materials encountered were typically described as follows:· Process waste materials – Soft, moist to wet, olive gray to black, low plastic siltyclay [Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) symbol CL], some with lightbrown fibrous material· Clay with cinders – Soft, moist, dark brown, low plastic silty clay to clay silt(USCS symbol CL to ML)· Alluvium – Loose, wet, red to gray, medium to coarse-grained sand (USCSsymbol SM to SP) with gravel or cobbles to medium dense, wet, gray gravel(USCS symbol GC) with clay and sand (bottom of 25SB01/25MW03 only)· Ohio River Alluvium – Soft to stiff, moist to wet, red to olive-gray to gray, low tohigh plastic (USCS symbol CL, CL-ML, CH)· Residuum – Stiff, wet, tan-gray, clayey silt (USCS symbol ML) with limestonefragments· Thirteen soil samples were submitted for geotechnical analysis as part of theSite25 investigation. Test results are included in Appendix F. All 13 sampleswere characterized as clay or clay silt mixtures.3.3 SHALLOW HYDROGEOLOGYGroundwater was encountered in all 12 direct push borings and the two groundwater monitoringwell borings completed above and below the dam. Groundwater was generally encountered atdepths ranging from approximately three to six feet bgs in all borings located within the basin(except 25SB05, 25SB06, 25SB07, and 25SB12) at the time of drilling. Borings 25SB05,25SB06 and 25SB07 were drilled at slightly higher elevations around the edges of the basin,while 25SB12 was drilled on a narrow alluvial bench or terrace just upgradient of the southbranch of the former pond, approximately 8 feet above the stream. Shallow groundwater wasmeasured at approximately one-foot bgs in wells 25MW03 and 25MW04, at the time ofsampling. The two streams, which exit each branch of the former pond, have most likelylowered the shallow water table within the basin as their channels incised into the former pondbed.Site 25 has most likely received groundwater that exited the three sites located upgradient withinthe Jenny Lind Run, including the Aniline Pond (Site 5), the South Ash Settling Basin (Site 4),Physical Investigation ResultsSECTIONTHREE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 3-6and the Process Waste Settling Basin (Site 6). It has also received surface runoff and possiblygroundwater from the other sites listed in Section 1.2, Operational History and WasteCharacteristics, especially surface water from the P & E (Site 54).Total porosities were calculated for 10 of 13 geotechnical soil samples collected from the OhioRiver alluvium. Total porosities ranged from 38 percent to 51 percent (see Appendix F, TableF-1).The dam at Jenny Lind Pond was built across Ohio River alluvial sediments in the Jenny LindRun. Groundwater flow is essentially uninhibited by the dam. Groundwater exiting the sitelikely follows the Jenny Lind Run and discharges to the Ohio River.RelativeElevation(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceEAST WESTRelativeElevation(Feet)0 160 550Distance(Feet)320 480SITE 25 -JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 1INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-1405060708090100110120405060708090100110120Distance(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock Surface080240?160 320?RelativeElevation(Feet)North South405060708090100110120RelativeElevation(Feet)405060708090100110120130SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 2INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-2130RelativeElevation(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceNORTH SOUTH0RelativeElevation(Feet)34080 160 240 320Distance(Feet)SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 3INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-33040506070809010011030405060708090100110RelativeElevation(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceNORTH SOUTHRelativeElevation(Feet)160040 80 120 160 200?Distance(Feet)?SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 4INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-4405060708090100110100110405060708090240RelativeElevation(Feet)NORTH SOUTHRelativeElevation(Feet)160040 80 120 160 200?240Distance(Feet)405060708090100110100110405060708090SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 5INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-5Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceRelativeElevation(Feet)Distance(Feet)NORTH SOUTHRelativeElevation(Feet)04080 120 200?160 240 270?SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 6INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-650607080901001101001105060708090Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceRelativeElevation(Feet)Distance(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceSOUTHWEST NORTHEAST112RelativeElevation(Feet)40 80 120 160 200 240SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 7INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-74050607080901001101204050607080901001101200270RelativeElevation(Feet)Distance(Feet)Interpreted Bedrock SurfaceSOUTHWEST NORTHEAST112RelativeElevation(Feet)2704080 120 160 200 240??4050607080901001101204050607080901001101200SITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDTRANSECT 8INDIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTDRN. BY: TJKCHKD. BY: MMSDATE: 07/26/01REVISIONS: 0PROJECT NO.45-FL99010D.00FIG. NO.3-8Data Quality Review and ValidationSECTIONFOUR Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 4-14.1 PHASE I RIPesticides/PCB results reported as nondetect for two sediment samples were rejected. Reportinglimits were elevated due to soil moisture content which ranged from 18 percent to 59 percent.See the Phase I RI report, for a more detailed discussion of data review issues.4.2 PHASE II RFIAll chemical data were reviewed following procedures identified in the INAPP Site WideQuality Assurance Project Plan (URS 2000). VOC data for six samples, antimony data for threesamples and pesticide data for three samples were qualified rejected (R) based on quality control(QC) parameters outside evaluation criteria. Data for select samples collected at Jenny LindPond (Site 25) were qualified estimated (J/UJ) based on internal standard, surrogate, LCS,laboratory duplicate and/or field duplicate data outside evaluation criteria. Acetone, methylenechloride, beta-BHC, arsenic, copper and nickel data for additional samples were qualifiednondetect (U) based on the presence of these compounds in the trip blank or laboratory methodblank samples or based on professional judgement (i.e., common laboratory contaminants).Acceptable levels of accuracy and precison were achieved for the data. A complete summary ofthe data reviews and validations is presented in Appendix A.The analytical data for samples collected at Jenny Lind Pond (Site 25) was determined to beacceptable (including estimated data) for the intended use with the exception of select VOCs,metals and pesticide data qualified rejected (R).Chemical Investigation ResultsSECTIONFIVE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 5-1All samples collected from Jenny Lind Pond were analyzed for Target Compound List (TCL)VOCs, TCL semivolatile organic compound (SVOCs), Target Analyte List (TAL) metals,pesticides/polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and nitroaromatic/nitramine compounds. Anadditional basin subsurface soil sample (2508DS02), collected from 1.0 to 2.0 feet bgs, wasanalyzed for nitroaromatic/nitramine compounds due to the suspected presence of nitrocellulosein this interval. As part of the Phase I RI, the samples collected were also analyzed fornitrate/nitrite. Additionally, four groundwater samples (2501DW49, 2503DW52, 2505DW29,and 2503MW01) collected during the Phase II RFI were analyzed for total suspended solids(TSS)/total dissolved solids (TDS). Field duplicate samples collected from this site included:Field Duplicate Associated Sample2511SS02 2502SS022539SD00 2502SD002540SD00 2528SD002539SW00 2503SW002540SW00 2528SW002501DS51 2501DS212501DW59 2501DW492503DS60 2503DS002506DS40 2506DS122510DS50 2510DS202512DS40 2512DS002588SD00 2538DS002552MW01 2502MW01Field duplicate sample results are presented in Appendix H.Sediment and surface water samples collected as part of the Jenny Lind Pond dam failureincident investigation were analyzed for TCL VOCs, SVOCs, TAL metals, pesticides/PCBs,nitroaromatic/nitramine compounds, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) – modified fordiesel range organics.Summaries of the chemical investigation results are as follows:· Surface and subsurface soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater samplescollected from this site and analyses each sample underwent are summarized inTables 2-1 and 2-2.· Chemicals detected, maximum concentration, and frequency of detects for soiland sediment samples collected from Jenny Lind Pond are summarized in Table5-1.Chemical Investigation ResultsSECTIONFIVE Jenny Lind Pond, Site 25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Section 1-10\Sections 1-10 Text_Rev1.doc\17-Jun-02 /OMA 5-2· Chemicals detected, maximum concentration, and frequency of detects for surfacewater and groundwater samples collected from Jenny Lind Pond are summarizedin Table 5-2. All surface water sample results are included in Table 5-2.However, surface water samples 25SW03 through 25SW30 were collected fromthe former pond prior to the 1997 dam failure.· Appendix H contains all analytical results.TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD ID 2501DS00 2501DS11 2501DS21 2501DS31 2501DS41DATE COLLECTED November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 100 39 / 105 9.6 30 J < 21 U < 23 U < 23 U 9.2 25 JAcetone 470 J 55 / 105 65 15 J 32 11 J < 17 U < 15 U 31 12 JBenzene 3.6 J 35 / 104 < 7.6 U < 5.3 U < 5.8 U 1.8 5.8 J 1.2 6.2 JCarbon disulfide 26 J 20 / 105 2.2 7.6 J < 5.3 U < 5.8 U < 5.8 U < 6.2 UEthylbenzene 0.7 J 1 / 104 < 7.6 U < 5.3 U < 5.8 U < 5.8 U < 6.2 Um/p-xylene 1.4 J 3 / 59 < 15 U < 11 U < 12 U 0.95 12 J < 12 UMethylene Chloride 91 J 9 / 105 < 15 U < 11 U < 12 U < 12 U < 12 Uo-Xylene 0.53 J 3 / 59 < 7.6 U < 5.3 U < 5.8 U 0.39 5.8 J < 6.2 UToluene 56 45 / 105 < 7.6 U < 5.3 U 1.1 6 J 2.2 5.8 J 1.5 6.2 JXylenes, total 3 J 1 / 45SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9700 15 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 U2,6-Dinitrotoluene 610 3 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 U2-Methylnaphthalene 170 J 9 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UAcenaphthene 350 J 8 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UAcenaphthylene 26 J 9 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UAnthracene 1000 18 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UBenzo(a)anthracene 5100 38 / 105 320 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 Ubenzo(a)pyrene 5900 37 / 105 460 510 J < 400 U < 420 U 660 420 < 440 UBenzo(b)fluoranthene 9800 36 / 105 770 510 < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 3600 J 17 / 105 370 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UBenzo(k)fluoranthene 3400 J 24 / 105 260 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 Ubis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 56 J 4 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UButylbenzyl phthalate 2300 17 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UCarbazole 850 19 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UChrysene 4900 40 / 105 450 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UDi-n-butyl phthalate 17000 29 / 105 430 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UDi-n-octyl phthalate 48 J 1 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UDibenz(a,h)anthracene 830 J 2 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UDibenzofuran 260 J 9 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 1 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD ID 2501DS00 2501DS11 2501DS21 2501DS31 2501DS41DATE COLLECTED November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualFluoranthene 8300 43 / 105 700 510 < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UFluorene 440 J 10 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 4100 J 12 / 105 370 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UN-nitrosodiphenylamine 6800 30 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UNaphthalene 130 J 9 / 105 < 510 U < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UPhenanthrene 5300 37 / 105 340 510 J < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UPyrene 7000 43 / 105 530 510 < 400 U < 420 U < 420 U < 440 UPESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 4.7 J 2 / 104 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 U4,4-DDE 46 J 13 / 104 2.2 6.2 J < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 U4,4-DDT 19 14 / 102 10 6.2 < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 UAldrin 4.4 2 / 103 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 Ualpha-Benzenehexachloride 0.92 J 1 / 103 < 3.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 UAlpha-Chlordane 9.9 J 29 / 104 1.7 3.1 J < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 Ubeta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 6.1 J 1 / 103 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 Udelta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 2.4 J 2 / 103 < 3.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 UDieldrin 15 J 12 / 105 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 UEndosulfan I 7.1 J 2 / 103 < 3.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 UEndosulfan II 3.7 J 16 / 103 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 UEndosulfan sulfate 38 J 12 / 105 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 UEndrin 18 23 / 105 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 UEndrin aldehyde 18 J 12 / 94 5.4 6.2 J < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 UEndrin ketone 40 J 7 / 105 < 6.2 U < 4.9 U < 5.1 U < 5.1 U < 5.4 Ugamma-Chlordane 8.5 J 14 / 103 2.5 3.1 J < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 UHeptachlor 6.8 J 6 / 104 < 3.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 UHeptachlor epoxide 2.6 J 3 / 103 < 3.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 ULindane 4.9 5 / 103 < 3.1 U < 2.4 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 2.7 UMethoxychlor 400 J 16 / 103 17 31 J < 24 U < 26 U < 26 U < 27 UPOLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 1800 3 / 103 < 62 U < 49 U < 51 U < 51 U < 54 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 2 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD ID 2501DS00 2501DS11 2501DS21 2501DS31 2501DS41DATE COLLECTED November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualPCB 1260 59 J 1 / 103 59 62 J < 49 U < 51 U < 51 U < 54 UPETROLEUMHYDROCARBONS (mg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons,diesel fraction280 1/6NITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 321 1 / 105 < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U2,4-Dinitrotoluene 18000 13 / 105 < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 UNitrobenzene 298 1 / 105 < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 400 UMETALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 18700 105 / 105 13200 30.8 10400 24.3 9590 25.6 8550 25.7 10400 26.8Antimony 13.7 J 8 / 89 < 15.4 U < 12.2 U 4.93 12.8 J < 12.8 U < 13.4 UArsenic 27.8 J 104 / 105 10.9 1.54 11.9 1.22 14.4 1.28 4.56 1.28 15.7 1.34Barium 301 105 / 105 115 1.54 97.4 1.22 49 1.28 49 1.28 47.9 1.34Beryllium 1.57 87 / 105 0.803 1.54 J 0.839 1.22 J 0.46 1.28 J 0.428 1.28 J 0.494 1.34 JCadmium 2.1 7 / 105 0.315 0.77 J < 0.608 U < 0.64 U < 0.642 U < 0.67 UCalcium 190000 61 / 61 65500 154 2400 122 28200 128 19100 128 22000 134Chromium 64 105 / 105 27.8 1.54 23.8 1.22 15.2 1.28 13.7 1.28 16.5 1.34Cobalt 33.8 102 / 105 8.72 3.08 9.49 2.43 10.2 2.56 8.08 2.57 10.8 2.68Copper 499 105 / 105 113 3.08 14.1 2.43 21.3 2.56 16.6 2.57 20.7 2.68Iron 66000 105 / 105 28600 30.8 22900 24.3 25800 25.6 21300 25.7 27400 26.8Lead 2310 J 105 / 105 221 1.54 19.8 1.22 12.2 1.28 10.5 1.28 13.1 1.34Magnesium 78800 105 / 105 3750 154 1750 122 11000 128 9560 128 10700 134Manganese 3660 105 / 105 877 1.54 737 1.22 405 1.28 326 1.28 415 1.34Mercury 22.4 57 / 105 2.32 0.154 < 0.122 U < 0.128 U < 0.128 U < 0.134 UNickel 46.2 105 / 105 20.2 3.08 21.8 2.43 26 2.56 20.1 2.57 26.3 2.68Potassium 3480 103 / 105 905 770 618 608 1200 640 915 642 1550 670Selenium 3.1 17 / 105 2.14 1.54 < 1.22 U 0.796 1.28 J < 1.28 U < 1.34 USodium 2360 84 / 105 38.6 154 J 30.4 122 J 117 128 J 101 128 J 131 134 JThallium 20.4 83 / 105 2.18 3.08 J 0.781 2.43 J 1.29 2.56 J < 2.57 U 1.38 2.68 JVanadium 61.7 105 / 105 26.2 1.54 23 1.22 15 1.28 13.9 1.28 15.9 1.34Zinc 3190 105 / 105 590 3.08 52 2.43 60 2.56 51.1 2.57 61.8 2.68Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 3 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD ID 2501DS00 2501DS11 2501DS21 2501DS31 2501DS41DATE COLLECTED November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000 November 13, 2000Maximum Frequency Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL QualOTHER PARAMETERS (mg/kg)Cyanide 18.7 3 / 46Total Organic Carbon 58.2 10 / 12 12.8 6.08Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramFrequency indicates the number of times a given analyte wasdetected in the samples.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample wasnot analyzed for these parameters.E = Value exceeds linear range.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions andreanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Center database.Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 4 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 100 39 / 105Acetone 470 J 55 / 105Benzene 3.6 J 35 / 104Carbon disulfide 26 J 20 / 105Ethylbenzene 0.7 J 1 / 104m/p-xylene 1.4 J 3 / 59Methylene Chloride 91 J 9 / 105o-Xylene 0.53 J 3 / 59Toluene 56 45 / 105Xylenes, total 3 J 1 / 45SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9700 15 / 1052,6-Dinitrotoluene 610 3 / 1052-Methylnaphthalene 170 J 9 / 105Acenaphthene 350 J 8 / 105Acenaphthylene 26 J 9 / 105Anthracene 1000 18 / 105Benzo(a)anthracene 5100 38 / 105benzo(a)pyrene 5900 37 / 105Benzo(b)fluoranthene 9800 36 / 105Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 3600 J 17 / 105Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3400 J 24 / 105bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 56 J 4 / 105Butylbenzyl phthalate 2300 17 / 105Carbazole 850 19 / 105Chrysene 4900 40 / 105Di-n-butyl phthalate 17000 29 / 105Di-n-octyl phthalate 48 J 1 / 105Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 830 J 2 / 105Dibenzofuran 260 J 9 / 1052501DS50 2501SD00 2501SS02 2502DS00 2502DS17November 13, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 22 U < 14 U 14 < 39 U < 22 U23 11 J 42 < 12 U 190 19 J < 11 U1.9 5.6 J < 14 U < 12 U < 9.7 U < 5.6 U2.8 5.6 J < 14 U < 12 U 5.2 9.7 J < 5.6 U< 5.6 U < 14 U < 12 U < 9.7 U < 5.6 U1.4 11 J < 19 U < 11 U< 11 U < 14 U < 12 U < 19 U < 11 U0.53 5.6 J < 9.7 U < 5.6 U2.3 5.6 J < 14 U 13 1.2 9.7 J 1.8 5.6 J< 14 U < 12 U< 420 U 120 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 73 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 42 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 120 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 64 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 40 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 100 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 4400 < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 5 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyFluoranthene 8300 43 / 105Fluorene 440 J 10 / 105Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 4100 J 12 / 105N-nitrosodiphenylamine 6800 30 / 105Naphthalene 130 J 9 / 105Phenanthrene 5300 37 / 105Pyrene 7000 43 / 105PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 4.7 J 2 / 1044,4-DDE 46 J 13 / 1044,4-DDT 19 14 / 102Aldrin 4.4 2 / 103alpha-Benzenehexachloride 0.92 J 1 / 103Alpha-Chlordane 9.9 J 29 / 104beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 6.1 J 1 / 103delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 2.4 J 2 / 103Dieldrin 15 J 12 / 105Endosulfan I 7.1 J 2 / 103Endosulfan II 3.7 J 16 / 103Endosulfan sulfate 38 J 12 / 105Endrin 18 23 / 105Endrin aldehyde 18 J 12 / 94Endrin ketone 40 J 7 / 105gamma-Chlordane 8.5 J 14 / 103Heptachlor 6.8 J 6 / 104Heptachlor epoxide 2.6 J 3 / 103Lindane 4.9 5 / 103Methoxychlor 400 J 16 / 103POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 1800 3 / 1032501DS50 2501SD00 2501SS02 2502DS00 2502DS17November 13, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 420 U 140 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U < 450 U < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 18 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 83 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 9 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 100 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 420 U 120 J < 400 U < 580 U < 420 U< 5.1 U < 4.5 U < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 5.1 U < 4.5 U < 4 U 4.2 7.1 J < 5.1 U< 5.1 U 2.6 J < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 5.1 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 3.5 U < 2.5 U< 2.6 U 0.51 J < 2 U < 3.5 U < 2.5 U< 5.1 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 3.5 U < 2.5 U< 5.1 U < 4.5 U < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 3.5 U < 2.5 U< 5.1 U 2.3 J < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 5.1 U < 4.5 U < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 5.1 U 2.3 J < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 5.1 U 2.1 J < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 5.1 U < 4.5 U < 4 U < 7.1 U < 5.1 U< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 3.5 U 2.2 2.5 J< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U 1.7 3.5 J < 2.5 U< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 3.5 U < 2.5 U< 2.6 U < 2.3 U < 2 U < 3.5 U < 2.5 U< 26 U < 23 U < 20 U < 35 U < 25 U< 51 U < 45 U < 40 U < 71 U < 51 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 6 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyPCB 1260 59 J 1 / 103PETROLEUMHYDROCARBONS (mg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons,diesel fraction280 1/6NITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 321 1 / 1052,4-Dinitrotoluene 18000 13 / 105Nitrobenzene 298 1 / 105METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 18700 105 / 105Antimony 13.7 J 8 / 89Arsenic 27.8 J 104 / 105Barium 301 105 / 105Beryllium 1.57 87 / 105Cadmium 2.1 7 / 105Calcium 190000 61 / 61Chromium 64 105 / 105Cobalt 33.8 102 / 105Copper 499 105 / 105Iron 66000 105 / 105Lead 2310 J 105 / 105Magnesium 78800 105 / 105Manganese 3660 105 / 105Mercury 22.4 57 / 105Nickel 46.2 105 / 105Potassium 3480 103 / 105Selenium 3.1 17 / 105Sodium 2360 84 / 105Thallium 20.4 83 / 105Vanadium 61.7 105 / 105Zinc 3190 105 / 1052501DS50 2501SD00 2501SS02 2502DS00 2502DS17November 13, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 51 U < 45 U < 40 U < 71 U < 51 U< 400 U < 538 U < 480 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 538 U < 480 U < 400 U < 400 U< 400 U < 538 U < 480 U < 400 U < 400 U10900 25.7 5970 13000 10700 35.3 13200 25.5< 12.9 U < 8 UJ R R < 12.7 U11.2 1.29 11.3 9.9 7.11 1.76 8.37 1.2755.9 1.29 72 148 104 1.76 64.5 1.270.563 1.29 J 0.64 J 0.99 J 0.674 1.76 J 0.64 1.27 J< 0.643 U < 0.8 U < 0.96 U < 0.882 U < 0.637 U41400 129 29000 3190 J 47600 176 18900 12718.7 1.29 36.6 J 19 18.3 1.76 19 1.2712.1 2.57 11.7 14.9 9.38 3.53 12.8 2.5517.8 2.57 19.3 19.3 23.6 3.53 23 2.5526900 25.7 21900 26500 20200 35.3 31100 25.512.8 1.29 122 J 18.6 J 37.9 1.76 13.4 1.2710400 129 3300 2470 4040 176 9260 127659 1.29 1260 J 1270 969 1.76 486 1.27< 0.129 U 1.5 < 0.1 U 0.511 0.176 0.039 0.127 J24.9 2.57 12.5 23.6 14.7 3.53 31.9 2.551370 643 362 J 760 J 607 882 J 1960 6370.553 1.29 J < 1 U < 1.2 U 1.61 1.76 J < 1.27 U126 129 J 353 J < 120 U 44.1 176 J 125 127 J0.713 2.57 J 7.5 2.9 1.39 3.53 J 2.04 2.55 J18.4 1.29 23.1 29.1 21.4 1.76 18.7 1.2756.7 2.57 85.4 69.8 102 3.53 75.2 2.55Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 7 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyOTHER PARAMETERS (mg/kg)Cyanide 18.7 3 / 46Total Organic Carbon 58.2 10 / 12Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramFrequency indicates the number of times a given analyte wasdetected in the samples.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample wasnot analyzed for these parameters.E = Value exceeds linear range.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions andreanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Center database.2501DS50 2501SD00 2501SS02 2502DS00 2502DS17November 13, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual7.3 < 0.3 U23.7 6.37Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 8 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 100 39 / 105Acetone 470 J 55 / 105Benzene 3.6 J 35 / 104Carbon disulfide 26 J 20 / 105Ethylbenzene 0.7 J 1 / 104m/p-xylene 1.4 J 3 / 59Methylene Chloride 91 J 9 / 105o-Xylene 0.53 J 3 / 59Toluene 56 45 / 105Xylenes, total 3 J 1 / 45SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9700 15 / 1052,6-Dinitrotoluene 610 3 / 1052-Methylnaphthalene 170 J 9 / 105Acenaphthene 350 J 8 / 105Acenaphthylene 26 J 9 / 105Anthracene 1000 18 / 105Benzo(a)anthracene 5100 38 / 105benzo(a)pyrene 5900 37 / 105Benzo(b)fluoranthene 9800 36 / 105Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 3600 J 17 / 105Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3400 J 24 / 105bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 56 J 4 / 105Butylbenzyl phthalate 2300 17 / 105Carbazole 850 19 / 105Chrysene 4900 40 / 105Di-n-butyl phthalate 17000 29 / 105Di-n-octyl phthalate 48 J 1 / 105Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 830 J 2 / 105Dibenzofuran 260 J 9 / 1052502DS29 2502DS39 2502SD00 2502SS02 2503DS00November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 15, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 23 U < 23 U < 13 U 27 32 32 J< 11 U < 11 U 19 < 12 U 320 14 J< 5.7 U < 5.7 U < 13 U < 12 U 2.6 6.9 J< 5.7 U 2.3 5.7 J < 13 U < 12 U 9.1 6.9 J< 5.7 U < 5.7 U < 13 U < 12 U < 6.9 U< 11 U < 11 U < 14 U< 11 U < 11 U 7 J < 12 U < 14 U< 5.7 U < 5.7 U < 6.9 U1.6 6.1 J 1.4 5.7 J 1 J 5 J < 6.9 U< 13 U < 12 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 11 J < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 7 J < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 15 J < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U 15 J < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 8 J < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U 3900 < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 9 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyFluoranthene 8300 43 / 105Fluorene 440 J 10 / 105Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 4100 J 12 / 105N-nitrosodiphenylamine 6800 30 / 105Naphthalene 130 J 9 / 105Phenanthrene 5300 37 / 105Pyrene 7000 43 / 105PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 4.7 J 2 / 1044,4-DDE 46 J 13 / 1044,4-DDT 19 14 / 102Aldrin 4.4 2 / 103alpha-Benzenehexachloride 0.92 J 1 / 103Alpha-Chlordane 9.9 J 29 / 104beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 6.1 J 1 / 103delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 2.4 J 2 / 103Dieldrin 15 J 12 / 105Endosulfan I 7.1 J 2 / 103Endosulfan II 3.7 J 16 / 103Endosulfan sulfate 38 J 12 / 105Endrin 18 23 / 105Endrin aldehyde 18 J 12 / 94Endrin ketone 40 J 7 / 105gamma-Chlordane 8.5 J 14 / 103Heptachlor 6.8 J 6 / 104Heptachlor epoxide 2.6 J 3 / 103Lindane 4.9 5 / 103Methoxychlor 400 J 16 / 103POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 1800 3 / 1032502DS29 2502DS39 2502SD00 2502SS02 2503DS00November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 15, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 14 J < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 410 U < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 9 J < 1100 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 11 J < 1100 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U < 4.1 U < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U < 4.1 U < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U < 4.1 U < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 6.5 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 6.5 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U < 4.1 U < 6.5 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U < 4.1 U < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U 0.6 J < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U 1.2 J < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U 0.25 NJ < 6.5 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 4.3 U 0.35 NJ < 6.5 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.2 U 0.18 J < 3.3 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U 0.91 J < 2.1 U < 3.3 U< 25 U < 26 U < 22 U < 21 U < 33 U< 51 U < 52 U < 43 U < 41 U < 65 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 10 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyPCB 1260 59 J 1 / 103PETROLEUMHYDROCARBONS (mg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons,diesel fraction280 1/6NITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 321 1 / 1052,4-Dinitrotoluene 18000 13 / 105Nitrobenzene 298 1 / 105METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 18700 105 / 105Antimony 13.7 J 8 / 89Arsenic 27.8 J 104 / 105Barium 301 105 / 105Beryllium 1.57 87 / 105Cadmium 2.1 7 / 105Calcium 190000 61 / 61Chromium 64 105 / 105Cobalt 33.8 102 / 105Copper 499 105 / 105Iron 66000 105 / 105Lead 2310 J 105 / 105Magnesium 78800 105 / 105Manganese 3660 105 / 105Mercury 22.4 57 / 105Nickel 46.2 105 / 105Potassium 3480 103 / 105Selenium 3.1 17 / 105Sodium 2360 84 / 105Thallium 20.4 83 / 105Vanadium 61.7 105 / 105Zinc 3190 105 / 1052502DS29 2502DS39 2502SD00 2502SS02 2503DS00November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 15, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 51 U < 52 U < 43 U < 41 U < 65 U< 400 U < 400 U < 530 U < 502 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 530 U < 502 U < 400 U< 400 U < 400 U < 530 U < 502 U < 400 U12100 25.4 11600 25.8 7930 9910 14000 32.56.07 12.7 J < 12.9 U < 10.6 UJ R 5.88 16.3 J14.8 1.27 13 1.29 11.4 8.4 12.7 1.6364.5 1.27 52.9 1.29 90.3 124 145 1.630.615 1.27 J 0.538 1.29 J 0.77 J 0.79 J 0.814 1.63 J< 0.636 U < 0.646 U < 1.1 U < 1 U 0.522 0.813 J22000 127 17900 129 10600 7900 J 66400 16318.7 1.27 17.7 1.29 16.1 J 13 37.4 1.6313.2 2.54 11.4 2.58 12.3 J 10.5 J 9.04 3.2522.5 2.54 19.4 2.58 14.3 17.6 130 3.2528500 25.4 28400 25.8 22100 18300 33500 32.513.1 1.27 12.1 1.29 15.9 J 17.6 J 342 1.639290 127 9430 129 3980 3450 2510 163441 1.27 460 1.29 621 J 1320 1010 1.630.034 0.127 J 0.038 0.129 J < 0.11 U < 0.1 U 3.29 0.16338.3 2.54 28.9 2.58 14.8 18.4 21.3 3.252040 636 1580 646 880 J 812 J 936 813< 1.27 U < 1.29 U < 1.3 U < 1.3 U 0.659 1.63 J185 127 175 129 193 J < 125 U < 163 U1.41 2.54 J 1.87 2.58 J 7.3 2.2 J 3.17 3.25 J17.8 1.27 15.5 1.29 20.5 22 30.2 1.6366.5 2.54 63.8 2.58 52 61.4 543 3.25Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 11 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyOTHER PARAMETERS (mg/kg)Cyanide 18.7 3 / 46Total Organic Carbon 58.2 10 / 12Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramFrequency indicates the number of times a given analyte wasdetected in the samples.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample wasnot analyzed for these parameters.E = Value exceeds linear range.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions andreanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Center database.2502DS29 2502DS39 2502SD00 2502SS02 2503DS00November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995 November 15, 2000Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 0.32 U < 0.31 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 12 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2-Butanone 100 39 / 105Acetone 470 J 55 / 105Benzene 3.6 J 35 / 104Carbon disulfide 26 J 20 / 105Ethylbenzene 0.7 J 1 / 104m/p-xylene 1.4 J 3 / 59Methylene Chloride 91 J 9 / 105o-Xylene 0.53 J 3 / 59Toluene 56 45 / 105Xylenes, total 3 J 1 / 45SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICCOMPOUNDS (μg/kg)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9700 15 / 1052,6-Dinitrotoluene 610 3 / 1052-Methylnaphthalene 170 J 9 / 105Acenaphthene 350 J 8 / 105Acenaphthylene 26 J 9 / 105Anthracene 1000 18 / 105Benzo(a)anthracene 5100 38 / 105benzo(a)pyrene 5900 37 / 105Benzo(b)fluoranthene 9800 36 / 105Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 3600 J 17 / 105Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3400 J 24 / 105bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 56 J 4 / 105Butylbenzyl phthalate 2300 17 / 105Carbazole 850 19 / 105Chrysene 4900 40 / 105Di-n-butyl phthalate 17000 29 / 105Di-n-octyl phthalate 48 J 1 / 105Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 830 J 2 / 105Dibenzofuran 260 J 9 / 1052503DS20 2503DS37 2503DS50 2503SD00 2503SS02November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual3.5 22 J 10 24 J < 29 U < 19 U < 12 U< 12 U 43 12 J 34 14 51 J < 12 U0.46 5.6 J 3.5 6 J 1.3 7.1 J < 19 U < 12 U< 5.6 U < 5.8 U 0.84 7.1 J < 19 U < 12 U< 5.6 U < 5.8 U < 7.1 U < 19 U < 12 U< 11 U < 12 U < 14 U< 11 U < 12 U < 14 U 11 J 2 J< 5.6 U < 5.8 U < 7.1 U< 5.6 U 2.7 6 J 1 7.1 J 6 J 1 J3 J < 12 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 62 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 19 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 25 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 120 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U 280 430 J 68 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 150 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 76 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 110 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 1200 J 10 J< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 23 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 130 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 6300 2000< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U < 610 U < 400 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 13 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyFluoranthene 8300 43 / 105Fluorene 440 J 10 / 105Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 4100 J 12 / 105N-nitrosodiphenylamine 6800 30 / 105Naphthalene 130 J 9 / 105Phenanthrene 5300 37 / 105Pyrene 7000 43 / 105PESTICIDES(ORGANOCHLORINE) (μg/kg)4,4-DDD 4.7 J 2 / 1044,4-DDE 46 J 13 / 1044,4-DDT 19 14 / 102Aldrin 4.4 2 / 103alpha-Benzenehexachloride 0.92 J 1 / 103Alpha-Chlordane 9.9 J 29 / 104beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 6.1 J 1 / 103delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane 2.4 J 2 / 103Dieldrin 15 J 12 / 105Endosulfan I 7.1 J 2 / 103Endosulfan II 3.7 J 16 / 103Endosulfan sulfate 38 J 12 / 105Endrin 18 23 / 105Endrin aldehyde 18 J 12 / 94Endrin ketone 40 J 7 / 105gamma-Chlordane 8.5 J 14 / 103Heptachlor 6.8 J 6 / 104Heptachlor epoxide 2.6 J 3 / 103Lindane 4.9 5 / 103Methoxychlor 400 J 16 / 103POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCB) (μg/kg)PCB 1254 1800 3 / 1032503DS20 2503DS37 2503DS50 2503SD00 2503SS02November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 260 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 24 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 28 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 370 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 12 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 130 J < 400 U< 420 U < 430 U < 430 U 220 J < 400 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U 0.74 J < 2 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U 2.4 2.6 J < 3.1 U < 2 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U 0.91 J < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U 0.65 J < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 5.1 U < 5.2 U < 5.2 U < 6.1 U < 4 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U 0.51 J < 2 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 2.5 U < 2.6 U < 2.6 U < 3.1 U < 2 U< 25 U < 26 U < 26 U < 31 U < 20 U< 51 U < 52 U < 52 U < 61 U < 40 UQ:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 14 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyPCB 1260 59 J 1 / 103PETROLEUMHYDROCARBONS (mg/kg)Total petroleum hydrocarbons,diesel fraction280 1/6NITROAROMATICS /NITRAMINES (μg/kg)2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 321 1 / 1052,4-Dinitrotoluene 18000 13 / 105Nitrobenzene 298 1 / 105METALS (mg/kg)Aluminum 18700 105 / 105Antimony 13.7 J 8 / 89Arsenic 27.8 J 104 / 105Barium 301 105 / 105Beryllium 1.57 87 / 105Cadmium 2.1 7 / 105Calcium 190000 61 / 61Chromium 64 105 / 105Cobalt 33.8 102 / 105Copper 499 105 / 105Iron 66000 105 / 105Lead 2310 J 105 / 105Magnesium 78800 105 / 105Manganese 3660 105 / 105Mercury 22.4 57 / 105Nickel 46.2 105 / 105Potassium 3480 103 / 105Selenium 3.1 17 / 105Sodium 2360 84 / 105Thallium 20.4 83 / 105Vanadium 61.7 105 / 105Zinc 3190 105 / 1052503DS20 2503DS37 2503DS50 2503SD00 2503SS02November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 51 U < 52 U < 52 U < 61 U < 40 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 738 U < 481 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 738 U < 481 U< 400 U < 400 U < 400 U < 738 U < 481 U8960 25.3 10500 26 10100 25.9 10400 12900< 12.6 UJ < 13 U < 13 U < 14.8 UJ R7.7 1.26 15 1.3 10.9 1.3 11.7 8.345.2 1.26 50 1.3 54.9 1.3 101 1280.516 1.26 J 0.532 1.3 J 0.553 1.3 J 1 J 0.96 J< 0.631 U < 0.65 U < 0.649 U < 1.5 U < 0.96 U37700 126 18400 130 18900 130 90200 5170 J14.6 1.26 16.9 1.3 16.8 1.3 34.1 J 19.29 2.53 11.3 2.6 11.3 2.59 9.8 J 11.3 J19.3 2.53 20.2 2.6 20.2 2.59 62.8 22.722300 25.3 25600 26 25000 25.9 36300 2280010.4 1.26 12.6 1.3 13.2 1.3 745 J 23 J14400 126 9130 130 9520 130 3440 2170384 1.26 377 1.3 416 1.3 945 J 1070< 0.126 U < 0.13 U < 0.13 U 4.7 0.1121.3 2.53 27.2 2.6 26.4 2.59 23 20.41450 631 1420 650 1480 649 600 J 1030 J< 1.26 U < 1.3 U < 1.3 U < 1.8 U < 1.2 U114 126 J 109 130 J 117 130 J 883 J < 120 U1.06 2.53 J 1.16 2.6 J 1.25 2.59 J 10.6 2.416 1.26 16.2 1.3 16.1 1.3 22 27.755.7 2.53 63.2 2.6 61.4 2.59 320 65Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Page 15 of 84 6/17/02TABLE 5-1SUMMARY OF CHEMICALS DETECTED IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLESSITE 25 - JENNY LIND PONDFIELD IDDATE COLLECTEDMaximum FrequencyOTHER PARAMETERS (mg/kg)Cyanide 18.7 3 / 46Total Organic Carbon 58.2 10 / 12Notes:* = Sample Collected on Multiple DaysND = Not DetectedRL = Reporting LimitQual = QualifierJ = EstimatedR = RejectedUJ = Estimated NondetectU = Nondetectmg/kg = milligram per kilogramμg/kg = microgram per kilogramFrequency indicates the number of times a given analyte wasdetected in the samples.This table combines data from the Phase I RI (1995-1996)with data from the Phase II RFI (2000-2001).Blank space for a set of analytes indicates that the sample wasnot analyzed for these parameters.E = Value exceeds linear range.Analyte frequency information does not include dilutions andreanalyses.Results in the table represent the highest reportedconcentration for each analyte.Analytical data for samples collected prior to October 2000was obtained from the Army Environmental Center database.2503DS20 2503DS37 2503DS50 2503SD00 2503SS02November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 November 15, 2000 February 26, 1996 December 5, 1995Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual Result RL Qual< 0.45 U < 0.29 U40.8 6.5Q:\4599\fl010d00\Site 25\Final\Sections 1-10\Tables_Rev1 Pag
Origin:	2002-10-02
Source:	http://indianamemory.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15078coll17/id/33749
Collection:	Clark County Collections
Rights:	http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/
Copyright:	Charlestown-Clark County Public Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes and makes no warranty with regard to their use for other purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and/or holders of other rights such as publicity and/or privacy rights is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. There may be content that is protected as works for hire copyright held by the party that commissioned the original work and/or under the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item.
Geography:	Charlestown, Clark County, Indiana 38.4357546,-85.6577676
Subjects:	Maps Indiana Ordnance Works (U.S.) Hoosier Ordnance Plant Indiana Arsenal Indiana Army Ammunition Plant Explosives Industry--Indiana Gunpowder, Smokeless Ordnance manufacture Black powder manufacture Facility One ICI Americas Inc Clark County (Ind.) Charlestown (Ind.) United States. Army Ordnance and Ordnance Stores INAAP

Further information on this record can be found at its source.